Tag: nonkilling

  • Glenn Paige: A Prophet of Nonkilling

    [The world lost a great man when Glenn Paige passed on January 22, 2017.  What follows is an article I wrote in 2010, the year in which Glenn received the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.  It is about Glenn’s great transformation in life from a successful academic to a prophet of nonkilling.  I’ve left the article in the present tense, and believe that Glenn lives on in the hearts and minds of the many people he inspired with his commitment to and leadership for a nonkilling world.]

    Glenn Paige is a man who in midlife re-created himself and his purpose on the planet.  At the age of 44, he shifted from being an academic Cold Warrior to a man dedicated to nonkilling.  He later described to me his transformation in this way: “It finally just came to me in three silent surprising words: ‘No More Killing!’  Technically it might be called the result of ‘cognitive dissonance’ when values and reality are perceived to clash.  But it was nothing rational…and was definitely related to many years of study of Korea and involvement in relations with it, South and North.  My book, The Korean Decision, justified war.  The results finally sunk in to me – neither peace nor freedom.”

    I asked Glenn to describe in a more detailed way what had happened when he experienced the words, “No More Killing.”  He replied: “The words/idea ‘No More Killing’ specifically came in an instant from the Korean experience – and was simultaneously generalized to the whole world, not just war, but all forms of killing.  The first thing I did was write a book review of my book on the Korean War….  Then I applied the same critique to the entire discipline of political science.”  Now he is applying the same critique to the world.

    I first knew of Glenn in the late-1960s.  He came to the University of Hawaii in 1967 as a professor in the department of political science as I was finishing up my Ph.D. in the department.  I would leave Hawaii in 1970, a few years before Glenn would experience his transformation in 1973.  At the time, Glenn had the reputation for being a Cold Warrior, having served as a soldier in the Korean War and then writing a book in which he justified the US involvement in the war.  I was strongly opposed to the Vietnam War, which was increasing in intensity and body counts at that time, and I had little tolerance for someone who had built his career on justifying any war.  I was neither open-minded about war, nor tolerant of those who supported it.  I felt that war was a way of misdirecting the lives of young people by propaganda and putting them in the untenable situation of having to kill or be killed.  In that regard, I have changed my views very little over the years, but Glenn changed very much.

    Glenn is a well educated Ivy Leaguer, who received a B.A. from Princeton and an M.A. from Harvard before being awarded a Ph.D. from Northwestern.  He had carved out a place for himself in academia with his study of the political decision of US leaders to enter the Korean War.  He had taught for six years at Princeton before accepting a position at the University of Hawaii.  He didn’t seem like a strong candidate for transformation, but something mysterious happened, perhaps something latent in his character asserted itself with, as he described it, “three silent surprising words: ‘No More Killing!’”

    Glenn transformed himself from an establishment academic who studied political leadership into a man who envisioned a peaceful, nonviolent world and was prepared to lead by example and personal commitment in attaining such a world.   He publicly recanted the conclusions he had earlier reached and written in justification of the Korean War, and he went on to renounce killing and to establish a Center for Global Nonkilling.

    How rare is that in academia?  It is so rare as to have an impossibly small probability of occurring.  Glenn’s initial path in academia was one that was bringing him considerable academic success.  He had been well received by the foreign policy establishment in the United States, and his studies promised a comfortable academic career.  However, his work prior to his transformation offered only the conventional “truths” that are deeply embedded in a culture of militarism.  It justified one war, which helped build a foundation for the next one.  It perpetuated the myth that wars are necessary and therefore glorious, the lies that induce new generations to submit to following orders and being willing to both kill others and sacrifice their own lives in war.  His earlier work, in short, was consistent with adding academia as a third institutional leg to the Military-Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned against.

    Glenn’s transformation was so rare, in academia or any other profession, as to appear as a miracle, a change not easily explicable by reference to experience in our society.  There are few modern day examples of such transformation.  Glenn is walking in the path of champions of nonviolence like Thoreau, Tolstoy, Gandhi, Schweitzer and King.  Like Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire, he is a prophet of nonkilling, which in my view goes even beyond nonviolence.  It puts into tangible practice Schweitzer’s concept of reverence for life.  It holds humanity to a higher standard.  Glenn left the safety and comfort of the academic cloister to envision and help forge a better path for humanity.

    In the future, I think people who seek a better world will look back with awe on Glenn’s life and transformation.  I don’t mean to imply that Glenn is a saint.  He is far too human and grounded for that.  But I do mean to state strongly that he is a most honorable man who is deserving of great respect for his transformative shift of course and what he accomplished following that shift.  Glenn became a leader in battling against our cultural acceptance of militarism with its all-to-easy reliance upon the use of force for domination and empire.  Should we ever arrive at a day when nonkilling becomes our societal norm, Glenn will certainly be revered for his commitment, eloquence and leadership toward achieving this end.

    Glenn once wrote me a humbling note: “I can only bow in reverence for the focused, successful mobilization of action for nuclear disarmament by the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation under your leadership.  I believe it is the most effective nuclear disarmament movement in the world.”  Of course, I was more than pleased to receive such a positive affirmation.  In reflecting on Glenn’s words, I realize that making such affirmations is one of the tools of a good peace leader.  Glenn is such a leader.

    Glenn Paige has done the very best that one can do with his life.  He has stood for truth and human decency.  He has radically transformed himself from an academic proponent of conventional wisdom in a society dominated by militarism to become a powerful voice and force for compassion, decency, nonviolence and nonkilling.  He has focused on nonkilling, a goal that to some may seem so distant as to be impossible.  But to envision the impossible and to work to make it a reality is another important characteristic of a great peace leader.

    Glenn has worked to bring the future we must achieve into the present.  He gives me and, I’m sure many others, hope that a better world, a better future, is possible.  He has demonstrated to other academics that the future is far more important than footnotes.  He has lived the truths of peace and nonviolence that he discovered on his life journey, and he has shown by example that each of us can do more with our lives than may seem possible.  In leading by example, he has shown a central trait of a strong peace leader.

    Thank you, Glenn, for cutting away the tangled intellectual underbrush to forge a path toward a nonkilling political science and nonkilling societies.  Thank you for envisioning and building an institution that will work toward these ends.  Thank you for your compassionate and impassioned leadership aimed at achieving a world in which the killing of other human beings is taboo.  Thank you for being you.

  • The Nonkilling Idea Can Lead

    You will note that I have greeted you with a gesture of nonkilling respect for you and for all life.  It comes from the non-violent Jain tradition of India.  Since air, like earth and water, is essential for life, Jains avoid conventional clapping as doing violence to life.  I invite you to try it out and add it to your repertoire of nonviolent actions.  You will note that it produces an electric group atmosphere of respect for life.

    It is a great honor for me and my wife Glenda, along with co-director Greg Bourne and global monitor Tom Fee of the Center for Global Nonkilling, to be with Rev. and Mrs. Lawson, all of you, and with leaders of the pioneering Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.  Among them I cherish friendships with Board Chair Professor Richard Falk, respected colleague from Princeton days, inspiring poet Dr. David Krieger, who completed his peaceful doctoral program at the University of Hawai‘i one year after I arrived from Princeton as a war-fighting “hawk” in 1967, and former Army Capt. Paul Chappell who contributed by Skype to the 2nd Global Nonkilling Leadership Academy program in Honolulu completed just two weeks ago.

    Gandhi rightly said, “My life is my message.”  In this case, however, the message is not the life, but a question.  The question is:  “Is a nonkilling society possible?”  Is it possible for us humans to stop killing each other, from the family to the global humanity?

    The question is unusual, for one thing because the word “nonkilling” is not yet in a standard English dictionary.

    Let’s take a vote.  What do you think right now?  We might change our minds tomorrow.  How many say “No”?  How many say “Yes”?  How many say “Yes” and “No”?  How many say “I don’t know”?  How many abstain?  

    Whatever you now think—“Yes,”  “No,” or “Other”—you are invited to explore grounds for confidently answering “Yes.”  They are set forth in the book Nonkilling Global Political Science.  First published in 2002, it has been translated into 22 languages, with 13 more in progress, including into Arabic, French, German, Hindi, Italian, Korean, Portuguese, Russian and Urdu.  Chinese and Japanese are forthcoming.  There are grassroots teaching versions in Haitian Creole, in Ogoni and Ijaw of the Niger Delta, and Kiswahili of Great Lakes Africa (DR Congo, Burundi, and Rwanda).  

    There are many grounds for confidence that we can stop killing each other.  Most humans have never killed anyone.  Otherwise humanity long ago would have spiraled into extinction.  Ninety-five countries have completely abolished the death penalty.  Twenty-seven countries have no armies.  Forty-seven countries accept conscientious objection to military service.  Spiritual traditions and humanist philosophies proscribe killing.  Science promises new understanding of causes and prevention of killing.  Components for nonkilling societies already have been demonstrated somewhere in human experience.  If creatively combined and adapted in any single place, nonkilling societies can be approximated even now anywhere.  In short, knowledge exists to assist crossing the threshold of lethal pessimism to confidently envision a nonkilling global human future.

    Since ideas can lead, the Distinguished Leadership Award in this case needs to be directed not to a person but to leadership by an idea—the idea that a killing-free world is possible.

    The Nonkilling Leadership Story is a remarkable one.

    It starts with Spirit.  “No More Killing!”

    Spirit becomes a Question.  “Is a Nonkilling Society Possible?”

    The Question becomes an Answer.  “Yes!”

    Answer becomes an Organization: “Center for Global Nonkilling,” focused upon advancing research, education, training, putting knowledge into action, and nurturing global nonkilling leaders.

    The Organization affirms the Global Nonkilling Spirit which is invoked in the following way:

    AFFIRMATION OF THE GLOBAL NONKILLING SPIRIT

    In remembrance of all who have been killed
    Of all the killers
    Of all who have not killed and
    Of all who worked to end killing

    Guided by the Global Nonkilling Spirit
    Taught by faiths and found within
    We pledge ourselves and call upon all
    To work toward the measurable goal
    Of a killing-free world
    With infinite creativity in reverence for life.

    The Spirit guides the Mission:   “To promote change toward the measurable goal of a killing-free world, by means of infinite human creativity with reverence for life.”

    Miracles begin to happen, such as:

    •    Humanity United, founded by Pamela Omidyar, steps forth in 2008 with strategic planning and capacity-building support for the unique Center for Global Nonkilling in 2009 and 2010 to carry forward the vision and accomplishments of its predecessor Center for Global Nonviolence, founded in 1994.  The vision seeks to evoke the spiritual, scientific, skill, and artistic creativity of nonkilling humankind.

    •    The thesis of Nonkilling Global Political Science escapes the bounds of political science and begins to question the killing-accepting assumptions of other academic disciplines.

    •    In 2009 young Joám Evans Pim in Spain edits and publishes Toward a Nonkilling Paradigm, engaging 22 authors in 15 disciplines, including chapters on nonkilling history, nonkilling mathematics, and nonkilling engineering.

    •    In addition, Joám mobilizes 375 scholars in 200 universities in 50 countries in 20 nonkilling research committees.  He creates a series of books by multiple authors published or forthcoming, including Nonkilling Societies, Nonkilling History, Nonkilling Engineering, Nonkilling Psychology, and Nonkilling Korea:  Six Culture Explorations.  Planned are volumes on Nonkilling Economics, Futures, Geography, Linguistics and Spiritual Traditions.

    •    Spontaneously, organizations and movements begin to arise to carry the nonkilling idea into research, education and action.  They arise in Brazil, Colombia, Germany, Haiti, India, the Philippines and Great Lakes Africa.  A little nonkilling school for 230 children aged 5-6 and 7-8 with 5 teachers arises in the village of Kazimia on the banks of Lake Tanganyika in the DR Congo.  A pioneering nonkilling anthropology course is created by Professor Leslie Sponsel at the University of Hawai‘i.

    •    On nurturing leadership, in 2009 and 2010, the first two Global Nonkilling Leadership Academies are held to bring young women and men together for two weeks to share experiences and to make plans for nonkilling change in their societies. They review lessons from leaders like Queen Lili‘uo‘kalani, Gandhi, King, Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Ron Mallone, Petra Kelly and Governor Guillermo Gaviria of Colombia, among others.

    •    Participants have come from Bangladesh, Colombia, Germany, Haiti, Hawai‘i, Ireland, India, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Liberia, Palestine, Philippines, Thailand, Trinidad, and Western Sahara.

    Going forward:

    •    The Center for Global Nonkilling becomes a partner of the WHO Violence Prevention Alliance in its work to eliminate human violence (suicide, homicide, and collective violence) as a “preventable disease.”

    •    Introduced by Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire, the Center becomes a Friend of the Nobel Peace Laureates’ World Summits and contributes to Principle 13 of its Charter for a World without Violence:  “Everyone has the right not to be killed and the responsibility not to kill others.”

    What does the nonkilling idea mean for support for the work of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and other great organizations that celebrate life while working for a world free of war and other threats to human survival and well-being?  It simply means adding nonkilling confidence to inspired work for nuclear disarmament and security, economic well-being, freedom and human rights, protection of the biosphere, and every other issue requiring universal problem-solving cooperation.

    The nonkilling idea seeks a killing-free world achieved by global diffusion of a strong nonkilling ethic combined with global citizen understanding of ways and means to bring it about.  It is a process in which each human being who shares the air and precious gift of life on earth now and in the future becomes a center for global nonkilling.

    And so, I share with you a nonkilling gesture, a question: “Is a nonkilling society possible?,” and an answer: “Yes!,” and offer some evidence that the ancient nonkilling idea is beginning to lead anew in the 21st century. More can be found on the website of the Center for Global Nonkilling (www.nonkilling.org).

    To all of you, Glenda and I bring warmest Aloha from Hawai‘i.

  • Shining a Light on Peace Leadership

    At the Foundation’s 27th Annual Evening for Peace on October 29, 2010, we will honor two outstanding individuals who have made significant contributions to building a more peaceful world.  

    Reverend James Lawson, a proponent of Gandhian nonviolence, was a mentor in nonviolence to Martin Luther King, Jr.  When Reverend Lawson speaks of nonviolence, he speaks authoritatively of his experience in one of the most important nonviolent movements of the 20th century, the U.S. civil rights movement.   

    Professor Glenn Paige is the author of Nonkilling Global Political Science and founder of the Center for Global Nonkilling.  He is pioneering in working for a nonkilling world, seeking to make the killing of other human beings a taboo.  

    The lives of our two honorees, like the lives of so many other individuals, have been affected by war.  Reverend Lawson was a conscientious objector during the Korean War, for which he spent time in prison.  Professor Paige served as an enlisted man and officer in the Korean War and then wrote a book justifying the war.  Later, he would criticize his own book and conclude there was neither justification for killing in that war nor any war.  For both men, the experience of war changed the course of their lives and put them on the path of peace.  

    War not only kills with bullets and bombs.  It also kills indirectly by robbing the world’s people of the resources for survival.  As President Eisenhower emphasized in his Farewell Address, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”

    The world is spending more than $1.5 trillion annually on war and its preparation.  While it does so, the United Nations struggles to raise the resources to meet its Millennium Development Goals to eradicate poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality and empower women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and build a global partnership for development.

    War and violence are the enemies of humanity.  There is a better way forward as shown in the lives of our honorees, nonviolence and nonkilling.  Nuclear weapons have made peace an imperative of the Nuclear Age.  We must eliminate these weapons, which threaten civilization and the human future, and we must also eliminate war.  That is the work of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.  The support of individuals like you allows us to work each day for a more peaceful and decent world, free of nuclear threat.