Category: Sunflower

  • Sunflower Newsletter: December 2014

    Issue #209 – December 2014

     

    Facebook Twitter Addthis

    We at NAPF work diligently because peace requires leadership, and because every man, woman and child deserves to live free from the threat of nuclear devastation.  But we can’t do it alone.  Please consider making a donation today to support this important work, including The Sunflower.  Every dollar counts toward creating a safer, more secure world.

    • Perspectives
      • On Modernizing the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal by David Krieger
      • Wage Peace, End Racism by Paul K. Chappell
      • Nuclear Weapons and the International Security Context
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Greenpeace Champions the Marshall Islands
      • Vienna Forum Features the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • NuclearZero.Org Now Available in Spanish
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • More Firings in Air Force Nuclear Ranks
      • United States Will Attend Vienna Conference
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Iran Nuclear Negotiations Miss Another Deadline
    • Nuclear Testing
      • French Polynesia to Sue France Over Nuclear Tests
      • North Korea Threatens Fourth Nuclear Test
    • Resources
      • Don’t Bank on the Bomb
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Dream of a Nation
    • Foundation Activities
      • Peace Leadership in Minnesota
      • NAPF Activities in Vienna
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    On Modernizing the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal

    The Los Angeles Times ran front-page articles on November 9 and 10, 2014, on modernizing the US nuclear arsenal. Both were long articles and the authors made the case that there is no choice but for the United States to modernize its nuclear arsenal, delivery systems and infrastructure at great expense to taxpayers, estimated at $1 trillion over the next three decades.

    The authors, reporters for the newspaper, write, “The Defense Department’s fleet of submarines, bombers and land-based missiles is also facing obsolescence and will have to be replaced over the next two decades, raising the prospect of further multibillion-dollar cost escalations.” This statement might be acceptable as a quote from a Defense Department official or in an opinion piece, but it hardly reflects the objectivity of professional reporters. It sounds more like an unattributed statement from a Defense Department official or from a “defense” corporation press release.

    To read more, click here.

    Wage Peace, End Racism

    If anyone doubts that attitudes toward race have improved in America, they should follow what is going on with the Ku Klux Klan. Being part black and from Alabama, I have been following this for a while now. The Ku Klux Klan is so desperate for new members that many people in the KKK are trying to reach out to people who are not traditionally considered white. When my African American father was born in the South in 1925, the KKK had millions of members (back then the United States had a little over 100 million people). Today it only has between 5,000 to 8,000 members in a country of over 300 million.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Weapons and the International Security Context

    At the 2010 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference, states parties reaffirmed their commitment to a “diminishing role for nuclear weapons in security policies to minimize the risk that these weapons ever be used and to facilitate the process of their total elimination.” Nearly five years have passed; another Review Conference is in the offing. Nuclear stockpiles of civilization-destroying size persist, and progress on disarmament has stalled.

    The commitment to diminish the role of nuclear weapons in security policies assumed that de-coupling nuclear weapons from conventional military forces would help facilitate elimination of nuclear arsenals. Yet there has been little progress in reducing the role of nuclear weapons. All nuclear-armed states are modernizing their nuclear arsenals.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Greenpeace Champions the Marshall Islands

    Greenpeace, the most inclusive, people-powered collective movement in the world, is lending its strong support to the Marshall Islands and the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits. In doing so, they are sending a clear message to the world that it is long past time for the nuclear Goliaths to begin negotiations for nuclear disarmament.

    Kumi Naidoo, Executive Director of Greenpeace International, said, “We stand with the people of the Marshall Islands in their fight to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Having seen their land, sea and people poisoned by radiation, they are now taking to task the nine nuclear-armed nations for failing to eliminate this danger which threatens humanity at large. Greenpeace salutes their struggle and joins them in declaring that Zero is the only safe number of nuclear weapons on the planet.”

    Greenpeace Champions the Marshall Islands,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, November 19, 2014.

    Vienna Forum Features the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

     

    The International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms and the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation are co-sponsoring a public forum on Friday, December 5, at the Vienna University of Technology in Vienna, Austria. The forum will feature a wide array of speakers, including: Tony de Brum, Foreign Minister of the Marshall Islands; Christopher Weeramantry, former Vice President of the International Court of Justice; Phon van den Biesen, co-agent of the Marshall Islands in the lawsuits before the ICJ; Marylia Kelley, Executive Director of Tri-Valley CAREs; and David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.

    The forum will take place from 2:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. It is free and open to the public.

    Click here to download a flyer for the event.

    NuclearZero.Org Now Available in Spanish

    The nuclearzero.org website (including the petition in support of the Marshall Islands) is now available in Spanish at www.nuclearzero.org/es. Please pass it on to your friends and colleagues in Spanish-speaking countries so that they can express their support for the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

    The website is also available in French and Japanese.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    More Firings in Air Force Nuclear Ranks

     

    Continuing a long string of disciplinary actions, the U.S. Air Force fired two commanders from two of its nuclear missile bases in Wyoming and North Dakota. Col. Carl Jones was the No. 2 commander of the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming. He was in charge of 150 of the Air Force’s 450 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles. He was dismissed “for a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership abilities.”

    Last March, nine officers were fired at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, which is the third of the three nuclear missile bases, in response to an exam-cheating scandal there. Last year, Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, commander of the entire ICBM force, was fired after an investigation into a drinking binge and other misconduct while he was in Russia as head of a visiting U.S. government delegation.

    Robert Burns, “2 Nuclear Commanders Fired, Another Disciplined,” Associated Press, November 3, 2014.

    United States Will Attend Vienna Conference

     

    The United States has announced that it will attend the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons, to be held on December 8-9 in Vienna, Austria. The U.S. openly boycotted the first two conferences on the humanitarian impacts of nuclear weapons, held in Norway in 2013 and Mexico in 2014.

    While the U.S. claims that it fully understands “the serious consequences of nuclear weapons use and gives the highest priority to avoiding their use,” it continues to possess thousands of nuclear weapons, many of which are on hair-trigger alert, ready to be fired at a moment’s notice.

    United States Will Attend the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons,” U.S. State Department, November 7, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Iran Nuclear Negotiations Miss Another Deadline

     

    Negotiators have missed the deadline of November 24 to reach a deal on Iran’s nuclear program, giving themselves an additional seven months to strike a deal. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that “we would be fools to walk away” since temporary restrictions curbing Iran’s nuclear program would stay in place while negotiations continue.

    Negotiations are scheduled to resume before the end of the year.

    David Sanger and Michael Gordon, “U.S. and Allies Extend Iran Nuclear Talks by 7 Months,” The New York Times, November 25, 2014.

    Nuclear Testing

    French Polynesia to Sue France Over Nuclear Tests

     

    The French Polynesia Assembly is preparing to sue the French government for nearly $1 billion in compensation for damage caused to the islands by nuclear weapons tests.

    The Tahoera’a Huiraatira party committee, acting independently of Polynesian President Edouard Fritch, seeks $930 million for environmental damage caused by 210 French nuclear tests conducted from 1966 to 1996 off secluded atolls in the South Pacific.

    Rose Troup Buchanan, “South Pacific Islands Prepare to Sue French Government for $1 Billion Over Nuclear Tests,” The Independent, November 24, 2014.

    North Korea Threatens Fourth Nuclear Test

     

    Reacting to “political provocation” from the United Nations, North Korean officials said that the country had no option but to consider an additional nuclear test so that their “war deterrent will be strengthened infinitely in the face of the United States’ plot for armed interference and invasion.” North Korea has conducted three nuclear tests since 2006, all of which were factors in the UN committee vote urging the Security Council to refer North Korean leaders to the International Criminal Court.

    Choe Sang-Hun, “North Korea Threatens to Conduct Nuclear Test,” The New York Times, Nov. 20, 2014.

    Resources

    Don’t Bank on the Bomb

     

    Don’t Bank on the Bomb identifies financial institutions that invest heavily in companies involved in the US, British, French, Indian and Israeli nuclear weapon programs. The report is published by PAX, a partner of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).

    The nuclear-armed nations spend a combined total of more than USD 100 billion on their nuclear forces every year. This money goes towards assembling new warheads, modernizing old ones, and building missiles, launchers and the supporting technology to use them. While the majority of that comes from taxpayers in the nuclear-armed countries, this report shows that private sector investors from many non-nuclear-armed countries also provide financing that enables the production, maintenance and modernization of nuclear arsenals.

    With this report, PAX, together with partners in ICAN, aims to increase transparency about the financing behind the bomb, and stimulate support for the stigmatization, outlawing and elimination of nuclear weapons.

    Click here for more information and to read the report.

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of December, including U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney’s comments in 2008 that the U.S. President can order a nuclear attack at any moment without discussing it with anyone first.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Dream of a Nation

     

    The Dream of a Nation Education Initiative is reaching hundreds of thousands of students across the United States. Based on the inspiring book Dream of a Nation, the classroom set is now being used in courses ranging from English Language, to American History, Economics and Environmental Studies.

    NAPF President David Krieger wrote a chapter entitled “Creating a World Without Nuclear Weapons” for Dream of a Nation. The book includes contributions from many other top thinkers and activists dedicated to making the world a better place.

    Copies of the book are now available for only the cost of shipping. Click here for more information and to order.

    Foundation Activities

    Peace Leadership in Minnesota

     

    Despite unseasonable record cold and early snow, Paul K. Chappell, Peace Leadership Director of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, inspired a crowd of activists, students, veterans, and concerned citizens in a five-day tour though Minneapolis and St. Paul. Events included a one-day peace leadership workshop at the First Unitarian Church, a public forum at Plymouth Congregational Church, university talks at Augsburg College and the University of St. Thomas, and a keynote speech at the 19th annual celebration of the Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers with about 300 people in attendance.

    To read more about Paul Chappell’s recent trip to Minnesota, click here.

    NAPF Activities in Vienna

     

    In addition to participating in the ICAN Civil Society Forum in Vienna, Austria (see Resources, above), David Krieger, Rick Wayman and Alice Slater of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be involved in many other activities in Vienna in early December.

    On December 5, NAPF is co-sponsoring a public forum with the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA) about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits. The forum will feature Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony de Brum, NAPF President David Krieger, Judge Christopher Weeramantry, Phon van den Biesen of IALANA, and Marylia Kelley of Tri-Valley CAREs.

    On December 8 and 9, the NAPF representatives will attend the Third Conference on the Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons, hosted by the Foreign Ministry of Austria. Around 150 countries are expected to send representatives to the conference.

    Quotes

     

    “I think any honest person with an ounce of common sense realizes that the only real path to higher morale in the nuclear weapons business lies in gradually shutting it down, starting with the most stupid parts first.  The hope that the nuclear sword of Damocles can finally be lifted, reinforced by gradual progress, is what can bring higher morale — and only that.”

    Greg Mello of the Los Alamos Study Group, commenting on U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s plan to increase the Pentagon’s investment in nuclear weapons by 10%.

     

    “I believe that peace is a basic human right for every individual and all people.  War is a negation and deprivation of all human rights, for life, property, liberty, and should be abolished.”

    Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Laureate and NAPF Advisor, speaking at Fondazione Patrizio Paoletti and Commune of Assisi on November 23, 2014.

     

    “One day we must come to see that peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but that it is a means by which we arrive at that goal. We must pursue peaceful ends through peaceful means.”

    Martin Luther King, Jr. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available from the NAPF Peace Store.

    Editorial Team

     

    Christian Hatchett

    David Krieger

    Grant Stanton

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: November 2014

    Issue #208 – November 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • Peace Leadership by David Krieger
      • How We Learned to Stop Playing With Blocks and Ban Nuclear Weapons by Ray Acheson
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Sean MacBride Peace Prize to the People and Government of the Marshall Islands
      • Next Steps in International Court of Justice Lawsuits
      • Open Letter in Support of the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Which U.S. President Cut the Most Nuclear Weapons?
      • Catholic Bishop: Do Not Modernize Nuclear Arsenal
      • Lawsuit Spotlights U.S. Charities that Fund Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • 155 Nations Sign Statement on Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons
    • Nuclear Testing
      • British Study Reveals High Birth Defect Rate
    • Military Industrial Complex
      • Weapons Companies’ Profits Soar Along with Global Conflict
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Third Edition of Speaking of Peace
      • UN General Assembly’s First Committee
      • ICAN Civil Society Forum
    • Foundation Activities
      • 31st Annual Evening for Peace
      • Peace Leadership in Maine
      • NAPF Activities in Vienna
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Peace Leadership

    We live in a time of war and in a world that sacrifices its children at the altar of violence.

    President Eisenhower warned against the “military-industrial complex.”  He might well have added, “military-industrial-academic-congressional complex.”  All are implicated in the obscene sums spent on war and its preparation.

    There are children growing up today who have never known peace.  Can you imagine what this must be like?

    To read more, click here.

    How We Learned to Stop Playing With Blocks and Ban Nuclear Weapons

    It is the responsibility of all NPT states parties to pursue effective measures for nuclear disarmament. Yet supporters of the step-by-step or building blocks approach seem unwilling to put these “blocks” in place themselves. Some of them host US nuclear weapons on their soil, without acknowledging their presence. Most of these states include nuclear weapons in their security doctrines via NATO, which has not taken a collective decision to reduce the role of this weapon of mass destruction in its military doctrine.

    While the nuclear-armed states and their allies resist negotiations on the comprehensive elimination of nuclear weapons, the rest of the world can begin to establish the framework for this by developing a clear legal standard prohibiting these weapons for all. This will take courage. But it is a logical, feasible, achievable, and above all, effective measure for nuclear disarmament.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Sean MacBride Peace Prize to the People and Government of the Marshall Islands

     

    The International Peace Bureau (IPB), the 1910 Nobel Peace Laureate, will present its annual Sean MacBride Peace Prize to the people and government of the Marshall Islands. The award ceremony will take place on December 5 in Vienna, Austria. Foreign Minister Tony de Brum will accept the award on behalf of the Marshall Islands. IPB chose the Marshall Islands for this year’s award because of its courageous legal actions against the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations.

    The event will take place on Friday, December 5 at 7:00 p.m. at the Vienna University of Technology. The event is free and open to the public.

    Click here to download a flyer for the event.

    Next Steps in International Court of Justice Lawsuits

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands, together with its international legal team, is hard at work on the next phase of the lawsuits before the International Court of Justice in the Hague. The United Kingdom, India and Pakistan are the three nuclear-armed nations that accept the compulsory jurisdiction of the court. Those three cases are moving forward. The other six nuclear-armed nations (United States, Russia, France, China, Israel and North Korea) do not recognize the jurisdiction of the court and are not required to have the case against them heard, although they have been invited to do so.

    The next phase of the ICJ cases is “memorials,” which are in-depth arguments about the issues. The Marshall Islands will submit its memorial against Pakistan in December, against India in January, and against the United Kingdom in March. Each sued party will then have six months to reply to the memorial.

    To stay up to date on the Nuclear Zero lawsuits, visit www.nuclearzero.org regularly.

    Open Letter in Support of the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    In an open letter to the people and government of the Marshall Islands, 82 advocates of disarmament and human rights from 22 nations, including two Nobel Peace Laureates, endorsed the federal lawsuit and a parallel suit the Marshall Islands have filed in the World Court against all nine nuclear weapons nations.

    “You, and any governments that choose to join you, are acting on behalf of all the 7 billion people who now live on Earth and on behalf of the generations yet unborn who could never be born if nuclear weapons are ever used in large numbers,” read the letter.

    “Win or lose in the coming legal arguments, what you, and any who join you, will do has the deepest moral significance. …All people and all governments that have the welfare and survival of humanity and the planet at heart must support you wholeheartedly.”

    Bob Egelko, “Marshall Islands’ Nuke Suit Against U.S. Gets Nobel Winners’ Support,” SF Gate, October 16, 2014.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Which U.S. President Cut the Most Nuclear Weapons?

     

    According to a new report by Hans Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists, President George W. Bush cut the largest percentage of the U.S. nuclear arsenal of any U.S. president. During his two terms, he cut the nation’s arsenal in half. His father, President George H.W. Bush, while serving a single term, came in a close second with reductions of 41 percent. Together, Mr. Kristensen noted, the two men cut “a staggering 14,801 warheads from the stockpile.”

    In contrast, President Obama has made only modest cuts to the U.S. nuclear arsenal and plans to implement major upgrades to its nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles. The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability, a Washington-based network of organizations (including the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation), recently condemned the administration’s plans as “the largest expansion of funding on nuclear weapons since the fall of the Soviet Union.”

    William J. Broad, “Which President Cut the Most Nukes?The New York Times, November 1, 2014.

    Catholic Bishop: Do Not Modernize Nuclear Arsenal

     

    Bishop Timothy Pates, Chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on International Justice and Peace, has written a letter to U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz urging the United States not to move forward with its plan to modernize its nuclear forces.

    Bishop Pates wrote, “The seeming indefinite reliance of the United States on a policy of nuclear deterrence, especially one that includes significant new investments in nuclear weapons, undermines President Obama’s stated goal of a world free of nuclear weapons. Excessive spending on nuclear weapons also undermines long-term initiatives to promote human security.”

    He also noted that the Catholic Church has called for a global ban on nuclear weapons since 1963, a goal reiterated by Pope Francis this year.

    Bishop Pates to Energy Secretary : Plan to Upgrade Nuclear Forces Undermines Quest for Disarmament,” U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, October 30, 2014.

    Lawsuit Spotlights U.S. Charities that Fund Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program

     

    A federal lawsuit seeks immediate release of a closely held government report about how American branches of Israeli charitable and educational institutes fund secret nuclear weapons research and development programs.

    The Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy filed suit for the report in the DC District Court as part of a public-interest drive to obtain long overdue enforcement of the Symington and Glenn Amendments to the Foreign Assistance Act.  The laws prohibit U.S. foreign aid to nuclear weapons states such as Israel that are not signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    Lawsuit Spotlights U.S. Charities that Fund Israel’s Secret Nuclear Weapons Program,” PR Newswire, October 28, 2014.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    155 Nations Sign Statement on Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons

     

    At the First Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, 155 nations signed on to the Joint Statement on the Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons, representing about 80% of the world’s countries.

    The statement reads in part, “It is in the interest of the very survival of humanity that nuclear weapons are never used again…. The only way to guarantee that nuclear weapons will never be used again is through their total elimination.”

    The statement also cited the third conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons scheduled for December in Vienna and urged states with or without nuclear arsenals to take part. “We firmly believe that it is in the interests of all States to participate in that Conference,” it said.

    More Countries Back U.N. Statement on Nuclear Disarmament,” Kyodo News, October 20, 2014.

    Nuclear Testing

    British Study Reveals High Birth Defect Rate

     

    A peer-reviewed study by Dr. Christopher Busby, a University of Liverpool Fellow, has shown that British soldiers exposed to radiation during the 1950s were ten times more likely to bear children with defects. Veterans’ grandchildren are eight times more likely to be born with defects as well, and are twice as likely to develop childhood cancer. The Ministry of Defense has claimed otherwise in the past, noting “no statistical significance” in the existence of birth defects among veterans’ children compared to the greater population.

    Susie Boniface, “Britain’s Nuclear Test Veterans Are the Victims of a Genetic Curse, New Research Reveals,” Mirror, October 18, 2014.

    Military Industrial Complex

    Weapons Companies’ Profits Soar Along with Global Conflict

     

    Stocks of many major U.S. weapon manufacturers are trading at record prices, as conflicts around the world lead to an ever-increasing demand. Investors see rising sales for makers of missiles, drones and other weapons as the U.S. hits Islamic State fighters in Syria and Iraq, said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Chicago-based BMO Private Bank.

    Lockheed Martin, the world’s biggest “defense” company, reached an all-time high stock price of $180.74 on September 19, when Northrop and Raytheon also set records. General Dynamics, the parent company of Maine shipbuilder Bath Iron Works, traded at $129.45 on that day, up from $87.74 a year ago. That quartet of companies and Chicago-based Boeing accounted for nearly $105 billion in federal contract orders last year.

    Richard Clough, “U.S. Defense Industry’s Profits Soaring Along With Global Tensions,” Bloomberg News, September 25, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of November, including the “Training Tape Incident” in which the U.S. mistakenly believed it was under attack from Soviet nuclear missiles.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Third Edition of Speaking of Peace

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has published the third edition of Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The book, edited by NAPF President David Krieger, contains hundreds of inspirational quotes from throughout history.

    The quotes are divided into ten chapters: Lessons of History; War; Peace; Nuclear Weapons / Nuclear War; Earth Citizenship; Human Spirit; Commitment to Life; Individual Power; Individual Responsibility; and Hope.

    To order a copy of the new edition of Speaking of Peace from the NAPF Peace Store, click here.

    UN General Assembly’s First Committee

     

    Reaching Critical Will, a project of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, maintains a comprehensive record of statements and votes made at the UN General Assembly’s First Committee on Disarmament and International Security.

    Click here to read countries’ statements, review voting records on disarmament-related resolutions and read analysis by leading voices in civil society.

    ICAN Civil Society Forum

     

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) has announced a Civil Society Forum to take place in Vienna, Austria on December 6-7. The forum will take place in advance of a government conference on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, also in Vienna.

    Representatives of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, along with many other campaigners, activists, experts, public figures and survivors, will gather to learn and to teach, to energize and be energized, to demonstrate our unity and to demand the end of the era of nuclear weapons. Over a packed but fun-filled two days, we will engage in discussions with the best and brightest voices in the humanitarian disarmament field, hear testimonies from inspirational individuals who know the meaning of courage, develop our campaigning and advocacy skills and, of course, get up to speed on the ins and outs of the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons.

    To learn more about the Civil Society Forum and to register, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    31st Annual Evening for Peace

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization, Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor. She has written, “We have to build a movement that takes on the arrogance of power, the tyranny of greed, the politics of hypocrisy, the idolatry of national security, the cancer of hatred, racism, sexism, the hysteria of nationalism, the sin of torture, the crisis of the environment, the madness of war, and turn that all into a culture, a country, that shows love, compassion, caring for the planet, and with that, we have to lift the voices of the peacemakers.”

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, click here or contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Peace Leadership in Maine

     

    “The most important work in the world,” is how Tilla Durr, the daughter of famed civil rights activists Clifford and Virginia Durr, described the work of NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell during his recent visit to Maine. Durr attended both the two-day Peace Leadership Training in Bridgton, Maine, and Paul’s lecture at the University of New England (UNE) Center for Global Humanities in Portland, Maine.

    “Paul does not just leave his audience with an intellectual understanding of the anatomy of aggression and the art of waging peace, but teaches us to see conflict as opportunity,” Durr commented about the training and the UNE lecture. “There was not a single person who attended who was not profoundly affected.”

    To read more about Paul Chappell’s recent trip to Maine, click here.

    NAPF Activities in Vienna

     

    In addition to participating in the ICAN Civil Society Forum in Vienna (see Resources, above), David Krieger, Rick Wayman and Alice Slater of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be involved in many other activities in Vienna, Austria, in early December.

    On December 5, NAPF is co-sponsoring a public forum with the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA) about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits. The forum will feature Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony de Brum, NAPF President David Krieger, Phon van den Biesen of IALANA, and Marylia Kelley of Tri-Valley CAREs.

    On December 8 and 9, the NAPF representatives will attend the Third Conference on the Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons, hosted by the Foreign Ministry of Austria. Around 150 countries are expected to attend the conference.

    Quotes

     

    “A debate on the renewal of the MDA would be used by some as an opportunity to raise wider questions concerning the possible renewal of the nuclear deterrent … and our obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.”

    — A 2004 internal document from the UK Ministry of Defense, explaining why the Mutual Defense Agreement (MDA) between the United States and the United Kingdom continues to be renewed in secret every 10 years.

     

    “Peace with a club in hand is war.”

    Portugese Proverb. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available from the NAPF Peace Store.

    Editorial Team

     

    Christian Hatchett
    David Krieger
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: October 2014

    Issue #207 – October 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • U.S. Nuclear Policy: Taking the Wrong Road by David Krieger
      • Making the Connection: The People’s Climate March and the International Day of Peace by Bob Dodge
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises
      • Tony de Brum Speaks About Lawsuits
      • Hearing on U.S. Motion to Dismiss Scheduled for October 10
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. Plans Massive Nuclear Weapons Modernization Program
      • New Mexico Nuclear Dump in Extended Shutdown
    • Nuclear Arms Race
      • Russia Tests Nuclear Missile
      • U.S. Tests Nuclear Missile
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Security Without Nuclear Deterrence
      • Tri-Valley CAREs Video Contest
      • ICAN Civil Society Forum
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF at Peace and Justice Studies Association Conference
      • Poetry Contest Winners
      • Rendez-Vous Ottawa
      • Evening for Peace
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    U.S. Nuclear Policy: Taking the Wrong Road

    On September 21, 2014, the International Day of Peace, The New York Times published an article by William Broad and David Sanger, “U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms.”  The authors reported that a recent federal study put the price tag for modernizing the U.S. nuclear arsenal at “up to a trillion dollars” over the next three decades.

    All this emphasis on modernizing the nuclear deterrent force may be good for business, but ignores two important facts.  First, nuclear deterrence is only a hypothesis about human behavior that has not been and cannot be proven to work.  Second, it ignores the obligations of the U.S. and other nuclear-armed states to pursue negotiations in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and for nuclear disarmament.

    To read more, click here.

    Making the Connection: The People’s Climate March and the International Day of Peace

    Climate change and world peace will each be highlighted on September 21, the International Day of Peace. In our nuclear armed, temperature rising, resource depleting world these issues are intricately related and represent the greatest threats to our planet. It is not coincidence that they be highlighted together. We must make the connection between peace on the planet and peace with the environment. Sunday’s Peoples Climate March will empower citizens the world over to demonstrate the will of the people and demand action as global leaders convene in New York on Tuesday for the U.N. Climate Summit.

    As our planet warms, causing severe droughts and weather conditions, crop losses at home and around the world, conflict ensues as competition for finite resources develops.  Entire populations and countries are at risk with rising sea levels. Climate change is a catalyst for conflict.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises

     

    Leslie Thatcher, editor of Truthout, interviewed NAPF President David Krieger about the Marshall Islands’ Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

    The interview focuses on the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the breaches of the NPT that are the basis for the lawsuits, the history of U.S. nuclear weapon testing in the Marshall Islands, and what individuals can do to support the courageous action of the Marshall Islands.

    Leslie Thatcher, “Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises,” Truthout, September 11, 2014.

    Tony de Brum Speaks About Lawsuits

    In an interview at the People’s Climate March in New York City, Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony de Brum explained why the Marshall Islands (RMI) is suing the nine nuclear-armed nations. According to de Brum, the lawsuits seek a “nuclear-free world,” one which RMI has a “moral and legal mandate” to pursue. “It is incumbent on us,” says de Brum, “to make a statement to the world and remind our development partners…to own up to their promises to reduce nuclear weapons.”

    To watch the video, click the link below.

    Why We’re Suing Nuclear Nations – Interview with Tony de Brum,” YouTube / Ecological Options Network, October 1, 2014.

    Hearing on U.S. Motion to Dismiss Scheduled for October 10

    The first court hearing around the Nuclear Zero lawsuit filed by the Marshall Islands against the United States in U.S. Federal District Court is scheduled to take place on October 10 in Oakland, California. The hearing will address the Motion to Dismiss, filed by the United States in July 2014.

    For those interested in reading the background documents in this case, they are:

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. Plans Massive Nuclear Weapons Modernization Program

     

    Since a deal was struck with Senate Republicans in 2010, the Obama administration has been ramping up the modernization of U.S. nuclear weapons programs, despite campaign promises to the contrary. The cost is projected to be up to $355 billion over the next decade. Many proposals have come up against obstacles, such as the discovery of a fault line underneath the proposed plutonium facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico.

    Beyond the refurbishing of nuclear weapon facilities, the Obama administration is also planning to build 12 new missile submarines, 100 new bombers, and 400 land-based missiles, all with nuclear capabilities. These proposed additions to the United States’ arsenal have been projected to cost up to $1.1 trillion dollars to complete. The size and scope of these nuclear projects have concerned officials inside and outside of the administration. Despite all of this, the Obama administration insists that its current course does not conflict with longstanding international legal obligations to negotiate and achieve total nuclear disarmament.

    William J. Broad and David E. Sanger, “U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms,” The New York Times, September 21, 2014.

    New Mexico Nuclear Waste Dump in Extended Shutdown

     

    The Department of Energy has announced that a nuclear waste facility in Carlsbad, New Mexico will remain closed until 2016. Known as the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, the facility stores nuclear waste 2,000 feet underground in storage drums. In early February, a truck caught on fire in the underground component of the facility, causing workers to suffer from smoke inhalation.  Several days later, a faulty storage drum ruptured, spreading radiation throughout the facility. At least 22 workers were exposed to radiation. The site has been closed ever since, and the estimated costs before reopening are estimated to total over $500 million.

    John R. Emshwiller, “New Mexico Nuclear Waste Dump Expected to Remain Closed Until 2016,” The Wall Street Journal, September 30, 2014.

    Nuclear Arms Race

    Russia Tests Nuclear Missile

     

    Russia successfully tested a new intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting targets up to 5,000 miles away. This test was one of many conducted on the Bulava missile, and follows the trend of increased military activity since the beginning of the crisis in Ukraine. The missile is capable of carrying 6-10 nuclear warheads of up to 100 times the explosive yield of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, Japan.

    The 39-foot, 40-ton missile was successfully launched from a submarine in the White Sea to a target in Russia’s far east. Admiral Chirkov, Naval Commander-in-Chief, has stated that two more launches will be carried out in October and November of this year.

    Russia Successfully Tests Nuclear Missile, More Planned: Naval Chief,” Reuters, September 10, 2014.

    U.S. Tests Nuclear Missile

     

    On September 23, the U.S. Air Force conducted a test launch of a Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. The missile was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California to Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. It came two days after the International Day of Peace (Sept. 21) and three days before the official UN Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (Sept. 26). Clearly this timing was meant to send a message, and it is not a message of peace.

    Though the Air Force Global Strike Command contends that the ICBM test launch program is to validate and verify the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of the weapon system, this test is yet another example of the continuation of decades of psychological and physical terror the U.S. has imposed upon the people of the Marshall Islands.

    David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and a consultant to the Marshall Islands on the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, commented, “The officials at Vandenberg say the purpose of the test is to ‘validate and verify the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of the weapons system.’ This means the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of a weapons system capable of destroying civilization. The Air Force is only doing its job: practicing for the destruction of the human species. Instead of launching missiles we should be leading negotiations to rid the world of weapons of mass annihilation.”

    U.S. Nuclear Missile Test: Timing Is Everything,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, September 22, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of October, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and nuclear tests by many different countries.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Security Without Nuclear Deterrence

     

    Commander Robert Green, Royal Navy (Ret.), has published an updated e-book version of his book Security Without Nuclear Deterrence.

    The nuclear-armed nations and their allies cite nuclear deterrence as the primary justification for maintaining nuclear weapons. Its fallacies must therefore be exposed and alternatives offered if they are to be eliminated.

    As a former operator of British nuclear weapons, Commander Green chronicles the history, practical difficulties and dangerous contradictions of nuclear deterrence. He offers instead more credible, effective and responsible alternative strategies to deter aggression and achieve real security.

    Click here for more information on the e-book, available through Amazon.com.

    Tri-Valley CAREs Video Contest

     

    Tri-Valley CAREs, a nonprofit organization based in Livermore, California, is holding a video contest entitled “Six Decades of Nuclear Bombs: Tell Us Why a Clean Environment Is Important to You.”

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is one of the United States’ two nuclear weapons design and research laboratories. Every nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal was designed at either Livermore or Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico.

    Operating this lab in Livermore, California for six decades has taken a serious toll on the local environment. In fact, the Lab has released over 1 million curies of radiation into the local environment (approximately the same amount that was deposited on the people of Hiroshima from the atomic bomb in 1945).

    Tri-Valley CAREs invites you to create a video in 2 minutes or less about the impacts of nuclear weapons on the environment in Livermore. Three cash prizes are available for the top videos.

    For more information, click here.

    ICAN Civil Society Forum

     

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) has announced a Civil Society Forum to take place in Vienna, Austria on December 6-7. The forum will take place in advance of a government conference on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, also in Vienna.

    Representatives of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, along with many other campaigners, activists, experts, public figures and survivors, will gather to learn and to teach, to energize and be energized, to demonstrate our unity and to demand the end of the era of nuclear weapons. Over a packed but fun-filled two days, we will engage in discussions with the best and brightest voices in the humanitarian disarmament field, hear testimonies from inspirational individuals who know the meaning of courage, develop our campaigning and advocacy skills and, of course, get up to speed on the ins and outs of the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons.

    To learn more about the Civil Society Forum and to register, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF at Peace and Justice Studies Association Conference

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be well represented at the upcoming conference of the Peace and Justice Studies Association. NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell will deliver a keynote address on the first day of the conference. NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman and social media consultant Shai Ford will present a workshop on the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

    This year’s conference will take place at the University of San Diego on October 17-18. For more information, click here.

    Poetry Contest Winners

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has announced the winners of its annual Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards. The contest has three categories: Adult (over 18); Youth (ages 13-18); and Youth (12 and under).

    The contest encourages poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. To read this year’s winning poems, click here. For more information on the 2015 poetry contest, click here.

    Rendez-Vous Ottawa

     

    Rendez-vous Ottawa will take place on October 25-26 at the University of Ottawa. The conference will introduce the global conversation about the humanitarian impacts of nuclear weapons to a North American audience and give participants the tools needed to spread the word and join the work towards a ban on nuclear weapons. Topics include the impact of nuclear weapons, our ability to respond to a nuclear detonation, legal and political roads to disarmament, the humanitarian approach to disarmament, campaigning skills and more.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will be a speaker at the event. For more information, click here.

    Evening for Peace

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, click here or contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “Over the last 23 years, we have shown that it is possible to live in peace and friendship without possessing a single nuclear warhead. Our weapon has been mutual trust and respect, transparency and confidence building.”

    Erlan Idrissov, Foreign Minister of Kazakhstan, speaking on the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (September 26).

     

    “When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall – think of it, always.”

    Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948), who was born on October 2. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available in the NAPF Peace Store.

    Editorial Team

     

    Christian Hatchett
    David Krieger
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: September 2014

    Issue #206 – September 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • Nuclear Weapons Do Not Make Us Safer by David Krieger
      • Hiroshima Peace Declaration by Mayor Kazumi Matsui
      • Nagasaki Peace Declaration by Mayor Tomihisa Taue
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up
      • Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit
      • Marshall Islands to Receive Prestigious Peace Prize
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Senators Call for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts
    • War and Peace
      • NATO / Russia Conflict Over Ukraine Intensifies
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • More Cheating in the Ranks
      • Texas County Seeks Nuclear Waste
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons
      • Israeli Nuclear Submarines Near Completion
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • George Takei Visits Hiroshima
      • ICAN Civil Society Forum
      • Don’t Ever Whisper
    • Foundation Activities
      • Paul K. Chappell Speaks to Citizens’ Action for Peace
      • People’s Climate March
      • NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award
    • Quotes

    Perspectives

    Nuclear Weapons Do Not Make Us Safer

    This letter to the editor of the Washington Post was published on August 22, 2014.

    Are NATO-based nuclear weapons really an advantage in a dangerous world, as Brent Scowcroft, Stephen J. Hadley and Franklin Miller suggested in their Aug. 18 op-ed, “A dangerous proposition”? They are not. They make the world a far more dangerous place.

    Nuclear deterrence is not a guarantee of security. Rather, it is a hypothesis about human behavior, a hypothesis that has come close to failing on many occasions. Additionally, nuclear weapons are not “political weapons,” as the writers asserted. They are weapons of mass extermination.

    The United States and the other nuclear-armed countries are obligated under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and/or customary international law to pursue negotiations in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and complete nuclear disarmament. This is the substance of the Nuclear Zero lawsuits brought by the Marshall Islands against the nine nuclear-armed countries at the International Court of Justice and in U.S. federal court. The United States continues to evade its obligations.

    Rather than continuing to posture with its nuclear weapons in Europe, the United States should be leading the way in convening negotiations to eliminate all nuclear weapons for its own security and that of all the world’s inhabitants.

    A link to the letter is here.

    Hiroshima Peace Declaration

    Summer, 69 years later. The burning sun takes us back to “that day.” August 6, 1945. A single atomic bomb renders Hiroshima a burnt plain. From infants to the elderly, tens of thousands of innocent civilians lose their lives in a single day. By the end of the year, 140,000 have died. To avoid forgetting that sacred sacrifice and to prevent a repetition of that tragedy, please listen to the voices of the survivors.

    To read more, click here.

    Nagasaki Peace Declaration

    At this precise moment, 69 years ago, the sky over this hill was covered with a pitch black nuclear cloud. The single atomic bomb, dropped by a United States bomber, blew away houses and engulfed the city in flames. Many fled for their lives through streets littered with charred bodies. 74,000 precious lives were lost to the terrible blast, heat rays and radiation. A further 75,000 people were wounded. Those who narrowly survived were inflicted with deep mental and physical wounds that will never heal, even though 69 years have now passed.

    Nuclear weapons are a continuing danger that threatens the present and future of our entire world. The terror that they bring is not confined to Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s past.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up

     

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) continued its efforts to compel the United States government to comply with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, asking a Federal Court judge to reject the U.S. government’s claim that the treaty cannot be enforced.

    On August 21, the RMI filed an Opposition to the U.S. motion to dismiss, explaining why the Court cannot and should not look the other way.

    “If the United States’ position is that in treaty disputes ‘might makes right,’ then I ask you, what does it mean – really – when a nation enters into a treaty with the United States?” said Laurie Ashton, attorney with the law firm Keller Rohrback LLP who serves as lead council for the Marshall Islands. “And what does the United States’ position say about its attempts to enforce other treaties, such as the Chemical Weapons Convention (recently against Syria), or, even more recently, the United States’ allegation that Russia is in breach of certain cruise missile test bans?”

    The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, August 22, 2014.

    Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit

    On the same day that RMI submitted its Opposition to the motion to dismiss, three amicus curiae briefs were filed in support of RMI’s position. All of these organizations are part of the Nuclear Zero campaign to support the lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands against all nine nuclear-armed nations.

    Tri-Valley CAREs argues in its amicus brief that the venue of Northern California is appropriate because the district contains Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, one of the United States’ two major sites for nuclear weapons research, design, development and modernization.

    Nuclear Watch New Mexico (NWNM) argues in its amicus brief that future funding levels for nuclear weapon modernization programs indicate that the U.S. is not committed to its NPT Article VI obligation. NWNM further argues that the United States is creating new military capabilities for U.S. nuclear weapons.

    Pax Christi International, Physicians for Social Responsibility and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War submitted a joint amicus brief. In it, they argue that the risk of nuclear catastrophe is substantial and that even a small regional nuclear war would put two billion people at risk of famine.

    Rick Wayman, “Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, August 28, 2014.

    Marshall Islands to Receive Prestigious Peace Prize

    The International Peace Bureau (IPB), winner of the 1910 Nobel Peace Prize, has been working diligently for peace since its founding in 1891. Every year IPB awards the Sean MacBride Peace Prize to a person or organization that has done outstanding work for peace, disarmament and/or human rights. The 2014 prize will be awarded to the people and government of the Marshall Islands for their courageous lawsuits filed against the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations.

    IPB believes that the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits could be a “significant and decisive step in ending the nuclear arms race and in achieving a world without nuclear weapons.”

    IPB to Award MacBride Peace Prize to the People and Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands for their Courageous Initiative to Rid the World of Nuclear Arms,” International Peace Bureau, August 6, 2014.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Senators Call for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts

     

    A bipartisan group of 26 senators sent a letter to Shaun Donovan, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, calling on President Obama to “support increased funding in the FY2016 budget to more rapidly secure and permanently dispose of nuclear and radiological materials.” They cite the dangers posed to US National Security by “terrorists and rogue states seeking nuclear weapons” as motivation for their proposal.

    The letter comes in response to the President’s proposals over the years to decrease funding for nuclear material security and nonproliferation programs. The senators argue that unsecured nuclear material poses high risks to Americans and thus programs to secure and prevent the spread of nuclear material must be accelerated.

    Merkley, Feinstein Lead Senators in Calling for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts,” Office of Senator Jeff Merkley, August 18, 2014.

    War and Peace

    NATO / Russia Conflict Over Ukraine Intensifies

     

    As the Ukrainian Prime Minister submitted a resolution to his Parliament seeking membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Russian President Vladimir Putin used his country’s nuclear arsenal to make an overt threat to Ukraine’s leaders and people. Speaking at a pro-Kremlin youth camp, Putin said, “It’s best not to mess with us… I want to remind you that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers.”

    As NAPF Associate Martin Hellman writes in a recent article, “While NATO membership for Ukraine would almost surely make Russia more caugious in its treatment of that nation, the immediate risk of NATO membership is likely to make Russia much more aggressive in an attempt to prevent that from ever happening.” The risk of conflict between a nuclear-armed NATO and a nuclear-armed Russia is too great for all sides to continue with threatening behavior.

    In a recent op-ed, NAPF New York Representative Alice Slater wrote, “Why do we still have NATO anyway? This Cold War relic is being used to fire up new hostilities and divisions between Russia and the rest of Europe.”

    Alexei Anishchuk, “Don’t Mess with Nuclear Russia, Putin Says,” Reuters, August 29, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    More Cheating in the Ranks

     

    The U.S. Navy has announced that it is kicking out at least 34 sailors for their involvement in a test cheating ring. The sailors operated undetected for at least seven years as they cheated on qualification exams to become certified instructors at the nuclear training unit in Charleston, South Carolina. The unit trains students in nuclear reactor operations in order to serve on the Navy’s nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers.

    Although there was “never any question that the reactors were being operated safely,” according to Adm. John M. Richardson, the cheating was nevertheless “a stunning violation of Navy ethics.” The students and instructors implicated in the cheating ring were not involved in handling nuclear weapons, unlike those caught in a cheating scandal in January at an Air Force base that operates land-based nuclear-armed missiles.

    Robert Burns, “Navy Kicks Out 34 For Nuke Cheating,” Associated Press, August 20, 2014.

    Texas County Seeks Nuclear Waste

    Loving County in Texas, the second least-populous county in the United States (population 95), is seeking to store all of the high-level radioactive waste in the United States. The federal government, with $28 billion to spend after the cancellation of its plan to store the radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, is seeking a new place to store the spent fuel from about 70 reactor sites across the country.

    Local officials believe that the money generated from the storage process would benefit the local economy. The county judge, Skeet Jones, said, “We could build some roads. We could bring in some more water. We could have a town that’s incorporated, have a city council, maybe even start a school… Maybe even have a Walmart.”

    Matthew Wald, “County of 95 Sees Opportunity in Toxic Waste,” The New York Times, August 7, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons

    According to a new report by Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris, there are approximately 16,300 nuclear weapons in the world, located at 98 sites in 14 countries. Approximately 10,000 of these weapons are in military arsenals; the remaining weapons are said to be awaiting dismantlement. The United States and Russia together possess 93% of the nuclear weapons in the world. Approximately 1,800 nuclear weapons are on high alert and ready for use on short notice.

    Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris, “Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons, 2014,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August 26, 2014.

    Israeli Nuclear Submarines Near Completion

    Three Dolphin II-class submarines ordered by the Israeli Navy are nearly complete as construction continues at Germany’s ThyssenKrup Marine Systems shipyard. Although the Israeli government will not admit it, German defense ministry officials and others believe that Israel intends for the new submarines to be nuclear-armed. The submarine’s maximum distance before refueling puts it in range of Iran, further bolstering Israel’s nuclear deterrence capabilities.

    Robert Beckhusen, “Israel’s Quiet Doomsday Submarines Are Almost Ready,” War is Boring, August 17, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of September, including the “Damascus Incident” profiled in Eric Schlosser’s recent book Command and Control.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    George Takei Visits Hiroshima

     

    Activist and actor George Takei, best known for his role in Star Trek, has made a four-minute video of a recent visit to Hiroshima. Takei, who has strong family ties to Hiroshima, visits the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Park and the Peace Museum, documenting some of the tragedy of the U.S. atomic bombing.

    Click here to watch the video.

    ICAN Civil Society Forum

     

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) has announced a Civil Society Forum to take place in Vienna, Austria on December 6-7. The forum takes place in advance of a government conference on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, also in Vienna.

    Representatives of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, along with many other campaigners, activists, experts, public figures and survivors, will gather to learn and to teach, to energize and be energized, to demonstrate our unity and to demand the end of the era of nuclear weapons. Over a packed but fun-filled two days, we will engage in discussions with the best and brightest voices in the humanitarian disarmament field, hear testimonies from inspirational individuals who know the meaning of courage, develop our campaigning and advocacy skills and, of course, get up to speed on the ins and outs of the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons.

    To learn more about the Civil Society Forum and to register, click here.

    Don’t Ever Whisper

     

    Don’t Ever Whisper is an inspiring story about the life and tragic early death of a Marshallese woman, Darlene Keju, a Pacific health pioneer and champion for nuclear survivors. Darlene is well-known for a moving speech that she gave at the General Assembly of the World Council of Churches in 1983 about the suffering caused by U.S. nuclear and thermonuclear testing.

    David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, said, “This inspiring book will help the reader understand not only the life of an extraordinary woman, but also the ongoing struggles of Marshall Islanders in coping with the consequences of U.S. nuclear weapon testing.”

    To purchase a copy of the book, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Paul K. Chappell Speaks to Citizens’ Action for Peace

     

    On August 15, NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell spoke to Citizens’ Action for Peace in Redlands, California on “The Art of Waging Peace.” Held at the Redlands United Church of Christ, Chappell’s lecture discussed the military, historical, and scientific evidence on whether humanity is naturally violent or naturally peaceful, how American citizens have created positive change in the past, and how we can do so again. He also addressed the rise of fundamentalism and what this tells us about human nature.

    Despite these uncertain political times, Chappell’s talk was viewed as uplifting and motivating. Emmilienne Wallick Colunga, an 18-year-old student at the University of California Riverside, said, “It’s incredibly easy to become discouraged with the state of affairs in today’s world, the injustice and the violence can be overwhelming at times. Paul Chappell brings hope and inspiration back to those that are discouraged with his knowledge of positive change over the decades and confidence that there is a way to change the world that is not through war and hurt – rather through the art of waging peace.”

    For more information on the NAPF Peace Leadership Program, click here. For a full list of Paul’s upcoming lectures and workshops, click here.

    People’s Climate March

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is supporting the People’s Climate March in New York City on September 21. Nuclear weapons and climate change are the two existential threats that face humanity. Both are the result of human activity and both can be eliminated by human ingenuity. Also, even “limited” use of nuclear weapons would create catastrophic climatic consequences that would dwarf the environmental impact of carbon emissions.

    For more information on the People’s Climate March and the September 19-20 Global Climate Convergence for Peace, People and the Planet, click here.

    Nuclear Savage: The Islands of Secret Project 4.1

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host a free screening of the powerful documentary Nuclear Savage: The Islands of Secret Project 4.1 in Santa Barbara on September 25 to mark Nuclear Abolition Day. The documentary by Adam Horowitz exposes the ugly truth behind U.S. atomic testing in the Marshall Islands.

    Commissioned by PBS and winner of multiple film festival awards, Nuclear Savage was abruptly pulled each time it was scheduled to air. It has never been shown on U.S. television.

    For more information on the September 25 screening, click here. To learn more about this documentary, click here. If you are interested in hosting a screening of the documentary in your area, please email NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman at rwayman@napf.org.

    NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “On this International Day against Nuclear Tests, let us all take a fresh look at [the] survivors’ stories. Listen to their words and imagine the effects of these detonations as if they were experienced by each of us. Only then can we can better understand the imperative to renew our commitment to a world free of nuclear weapons and nuclear tests.”

    Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General, commenting on the International Day Against Nuclear Tests (August 29).

     

    “If you want to make peace, you don’t talk to your friends. You talk to your enemies.”

    General Moshe Dyan (1915-1981), Israeli military leader. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available in the NAPF Peace Store.

     

    “The world can little afford the trillions of dollars in military spending and trillions and trillions of brain cells wasted on war when our very Earth is under stress and needs the critical attention of our best minds and thinking, and the abundance of resources mindlessly diverted to war to be made available for the challenges confronting us to create a livable future for life on earth.”

    — NAPF Representative Alice Slater. This text also appears in a petition for an independent inquiry into the airplane crash in Ukraine and its catastrophic aftermath.

     

    “We need to find ways of avoiding standing still.”

    Alexander Kmentt, director for Disarmament, Arms Control and Non-Proliferation of the Austrian Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs, commenting on the need to pursue real action for the elimination of all nuclear weapons.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Elliot Serbin
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: August 2014

    Issue #205 – August 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • The Marshall Islands: Sounding a Wakeup Call by David Krieger
      • Open Letter from the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center by Sister Megan Rice
      • What Are Acceptable Nuclear Risks? by Martin Hellman
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • U.S. Moves to Dismiss Nuclear Zero Lawsuit
      • Letter About Nuclear Zero Lawsuits in The New York Times
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. and UK Renew Nuclear Weapon Deal
      • Los Alamos Employee Fired after Writing about Nuclear Weapons Abolition
      • Air Force Changes Grading System to Stop Cheating
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • Are Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders?
      • Top Officer Happy with Air Force Ethics
      • Nuclear Waste Partnership Received Bonus after Radiation Leak
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Russia Accused of Violating Nuclear Treaty
      • Iran Nuclear Negotiations Extended by Four Months
    • War and Peace
      • Last Living Member of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Crew Dies
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • New Study on Consequences of a Small Nuclear Event
    • Foundation Activities
      • Peace Leadership for Youth
      • Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    The Marshall Islands: Sounding a Wakeup Call

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) is an island country in the northern Pacific with a population of approximately 70,000 people. For such a small country, it is making big waves.  As a country at risk of being submerged due to rising ocean levels, the RMI has played a leadership role in the international conferences concerned with climate change.  As a country that suffered 12 years of devastating U.S. nuclear testing, it has also chosen to take action to assure that no other country suffers the fate its citizens have due to nuclear weapons.  It has sued the nine nuclear-armed countries for failing to meet their obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and customary international law to negotiate in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and for nuclear disarmament.

    The Marshall Islands has given humanity a wake-up call. Each of us has a choice.  We can wake up, or we can continue our complacent slumber.

    To read more, click here.

    Open Letter from the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center

    We send warm greetings and many thanks to all who actively engage in the transformation of weapons of mass destruction to sustainable life-giving alternatives. Gregory Boertje-Obed (U.S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) Michael Walli (Federal Correctional Institution McKean, Bradford, Pennsylvania) and I are sending you some of our observations and concerns on the 2nd anniversary of our Transform Now Plowshares action.

    There are a number of reasons for what we did. We three were acutely mindful of the widespread loss to humanity that nuclear systems have already caused, and we realize that all life on Earth could be exterminated through intentional, accidental, or technical error.

    To read more, click here.

    What Are Acceptable Nuclear Risks?

    When I read Eric Schlosser’s acclaimed 2013 book, Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety, I found a tantalizing revelation on pages 170-171, when it asked, “What was the ‘acceptable’ probability of an accidental nuclear explosion?” and then proceeded to describe a 1957 Sandia Report, “Acceptable Premature Probabilities for Nuclear Weapons,” which dealt with that question.

    Using the same criterion as this report, which, of course, is open to question, my analysis shows that nuclear terrorism would have to have a risk of at most 0.5% per year to be considered “acceptable.” In contrast, existing estimates are roughly 20 times higher.

    In short, the risks of catastrophes involving nuclear weapons currently appear to be far above any acceptable level. Isn’t it time we started paying more attention to those risks, and taking steps to reduce them?

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    U.S. Moves to Dismiss Marshall Islands Lawsuit

     

    On July 21, 2014, the United States filed a motion to dismiss the Nuclear Zero lawsuit that was filed by the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) on April 24, 2014 in U.S. Federal Court.

    The U.S., in its move to dismiss the RMI lawsuit, does not argue that the U.S. is in compliance with its NPT disarmament obligations. Instead, it argues in a variety of ways that its non-compliance with these obligations is, essentially, justifiable, and not subject to the court’s jurisdiction.

    A response from the Marshall Islands will be submitted to the Court by August 21.

    U.S. Moves to Dismiss Marshall Islands Lawsuit,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, July 22, 2014.

    Letter About Nuclear Zero Lawsuits in The New York Times

     

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman had a letter to the editor published in The New York Times on July 15. The letter was a response to The Times‘ editorial about India’s potential membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

    In his letter, Wayman wrote, “Your suggestion that India negotiate with Pakistan and China for an end to that region’s nuclear arms race would be a good start to fulfilling its existing international legal obligations. But good-faith negotiations must also go beyond India’s immediate rivals to include all nine nuclear-armed countries.”

    He continued, “India’s pursuit of Nuclear Suppliers Group membership is not merely a question of trade and commerce. It is a question of whether known nuclear proliferators will be rewarded or held accountable under international law.”

    Rick Wayman, “Pressure on the Nuclear Nine,” The New York Times, July 15, 2014.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. and UK Officially Renew Nuclear Weapon Deal

     

    U.S. and British officials quietly agreed last week to a 10-year renewal of the 1958 Mutual Defense Agreement (MDA). The only indication that a new deal had been struck was a message from President Obama to Congress, in which he acknowledged that the deal will, among other things, “permit the transfer between the United States and the United Kingdom of classified information concerning atomic weapons.”

    The deal signals continued cooperation between the two governments regarding nuclear warhead designs and development. Critics of the deal contend that it is in violation of Article 1 of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which prohibits nuclear weapon states from transferring “to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons… or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly…”

    Richard Norton-Taylor, “UK-US Sign Secret New Deal on Nuclear Weapons,” The Guardian, July 29, 2014.

    Los Alamos Employee Fired after Writing about Nuclear Weapons Abolition

    James Doyle, a nonproliferation expert at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, was fired after writing an article in his personal capacity that supported the abolition of nuclear weapons. After receiving clearance from the Lab to publish the article, officials retroactively declared the article classified a few days later.

    Doyle believes that his firing was retribution for his refusal to stay on message and support the Lab’s central mission, namely its continued development and production of nuclear arms, at a cost of almost $2 billion per year there.

    Jay Coghlan, Executive Director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, said, “[This was] a clear political firing and abuse of classification procedures. Why are we paying tens of millions in profits to the private contractors running LANL? We demand that federal overseers intervene, reprimand the Lab, reinstate James Doyle, fire those responsible for his political firing, and cut contractor award fees because of chronically poor performance and leadership.”

    Douglas Birch, “Nuclear Weapons Lab Employee Fired After Publishing Scathing Critique of the Arms Race,” Center for Public Integrity, July 31, 2014.

    Air Force Changes Grading System to Stop Cheating

     

    In an effort to combat cheating on monthly preparedness tests, the Air Force is changing its grading system for its nuclear missile corps. Tests will now be pass-fail, and individual scores will not be reported, in a major shift away from the “perfection” culture that required at least a 90 percent to pass. The new test regime focuses more on “practical skills,” emphasizing that “as a team, [missile crews] need to make the right decisions, but as individuals they’re not required to be perfect.”

    Changing the grading system may reduce the incentive to cheat, but may not resolve all the missile corps problems. Bruce Blair, former missile officer and head of Global Zero, argues that missile crews have lost a sense of importance in their job, as “their mission is no longer the priority it was” during the Cold War era.

    Geoff Brumfiel, “To Stop Cheating, Nuclear Officers Ditch the Grades,” NPR, July 28, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    Are Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders?

     

    Comedian John Oliver delivered a scathing 15-minute report on the status of U.S. nuclear weapons on his HBO program Last Week Tonight.

    Facts presented by Oliver include:

    • Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous things on Earth;
    • The United States has a lot of them;
    • Some are controlled by floppy disks;
    • We’ve nearly dropped them on ourselves a few times;
    • No one seems to care about any of those facts.

    To watch the episode, click here.

    Carol Hartsell, “John Oliver Calls Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders,” The Huffington Post, July 28, 2014.

    Top Officer Happy with Air Force Ethics

    Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh is “very happy” with the “ethical fabric” of the United States Air Force, despite a recent series of scandals involving the nuclear-missile corps. In an interview, Gen. Welsh said “[W]e do not have an epidemic of bad ethical behavior by people across the Air Force.”

    The Air Force’s intercontinental ballistic missile mission has been the site of a number of recent incidents.  These include a test-cheating ring at the Montana ICBM base, security lapses by officers on missile-launch duty, and allegations of drug possession. Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the strategic missile mission, was forced to retire last year after drunken behavior while on an official trip to Russia.

    Welsh Gives Air Force Top Ethics Marks,” Air Force Times, July 25, 2014.

    Nuclear Waste Partnership Received Bonus after Radiation Leak

     

    Just five days after a radiation leak at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, an underground nuclear waste dump near Carlsbad, New Mexico, the Department of Energy awarded a $1.9 million bonus to Nuclear Waste Partnership, the contractor overseeing the site. It is unclear why officials went ahead with the bonus, as an investigation into what caused the February 14 leak “revealed a number of operational lapses by Nuclear Waste Partnership.”

    WIPP has remained closed since the incident in February, which contaminated at least 20 workers. The cause of the leak is still under investigation.

    Atomic Waste Site Contractor Received Large Bonus Days After Leak,” Global Security Newswire, July 21, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Russia Accused of Violating Nuclear Treaty

     

    In a letter to President Putin, President Obama accused Russia of violating the 1987 Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty by testing a prohibited ground-launched cruise missile. The treaty prohibits the U.S. or Russia from possessing, producing or testing ground-launched cruise missiles with a range of 500 – 5,500 kilometers.

    President Obama has declared that the United States will not retaliate by deploying its own ground-launched cruise missiles. However, he has left open the possibility of deploying air- or sea-based cruise missiles, which are permissible under the terms of the treaty.

    Michael R. Gordon, “U.S. Says Russia Tested Cruise Missile, Violating Treaty,” The New York Times, July 28, 2014.

    Iran Nuclear Negotiations Extended by Four Months

    After failing to reach a deal by the July 20 deadline, all parties in the Iran nuclear negotiations agreed to a four-month extension. Wendy Sherman, lead negotiator for the United States, said, “Our intent is absolutely to end this on Nov. 24 in one direction or another.” Negotiations are likely to resume in September.

    Patricia Zengerle, “U.S. Nuclear Negotiator Declines Setting Deadline on Iran Deal,” Reuters, July 29, 2014.

    War and Peace

    Last Living Member of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Crew Dies

     

    The last member of the crew that deployed the first atomic bomb during wartime died on July 28 in Georgia at the age of 93. Theodore “Dutch” VanKirk was a navigator on the Enola Gay, the B-29 Superfortress that dropped the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. The explosion and its aftereffects killed 140,000.

    While VanKirk once said that the bombing hastened the end of World War II and “saved lives in the long run,” he also recognized the futility of war and the importance of nuclear disarmament. In a 2005 interview, VanKirk told the Associated Press, “I personally think there shouldn’t be any atomic bombs in the world – I’d like to see them all abolished.”

    Kate Brumback, “Last Crew Member of Enola Gay Dies in Georgia,” Associated Press, July 30, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of August, including the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945) and the Soviet Union’s first nuclear test (August 29, 1949).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    New Study on Consequences of a Small Nuclear Event

     

    A new study published in Earth’s Future warns of the dangerous consequences of a small nuclear event. Using a more comprehensive computer model of Earth’s climate system, the authors find that the detonation of 50 15-kiloton bombs (small weapons in comparison to those in the arsenals of the U.S., Russia, China, and France) in a regional war between India and Pakistan could lead to global cooling for at least 15 years.

    This global cooling, in combination with major ozone loss, would have a catastrophic effect on global agriculture. Pressures on the global food supply could “significantly degrade global food security or even produce a global nuclear famine.” The authors hope that the study will help societies “better understand the urgent need to eliminate this danger worldwide.”

    John Loretz, “Things Could Always Be Worse… A Lot Worse,” IPPNW Peace & Health Blog, July 16, 2014.

    Foundation Activities

    Peace Leadership for Youth

     

    NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell spent three days in July teaching teens in AHA! (Attitude. Harmony. Achievement.) in Santa Barbara about waging peace. Participants learned about the roots of violence and avenues toward healing through short lectures, videos, clips, interactive discussions, and activities, including skits demonstrating nonviolent ways to resolve conflict.

    Chappell said, “I was grateful for the opportunity to discuss the peace leadership skills I wish I had known when I was sixteen. Those skills–such as the ability to calm myself and others down, resolve conflict, increase my empathy, and heal the causes of aggression–would have benefitted me immensely.”

    For more information on this event, click here.

    Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    On August 6, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will participate in three events commemorating the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively.

    NAPF’s 21st Annual Sadako Peace Day will be held at La Casa de Maria in Montecito, California, at 6:00 p.m. This year’s featured speaker is NAPF Board member Robert Laney. The event is free and open to the public.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will attend a commemoration event at the gates of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), where many U.S. nuclear weapons have been designed and developed. A whopping 89% of LLNL’s budget request for 2015 is for nuclear weapon activities.  The theme of this year’s Bay Area commemoration event is “Failure to Disarm.” Rick has been invited to speak about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, which directly address the failure of all nine nuclear-armed nations to disarm. For more information on the Bay Area event, click here.

    Rick will also participate in a webinar hosted by Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) on August 6 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. He will be discussing the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, and will be joined by Neisen Laukon, a woman from the Marshall Islands who has been affected by U.S. nuclear weapons tests. The webinar is free and open to the public. To register, click here.

    NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “We must learn the lessons of history, that we may learn to identify and avoid the paths that lead to war.”

    Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. This quote is featured in the NAPF book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “Concerns about the ability of facilities here to withstand an earthquake, and what will happen if they fail, are at the heart of safety concerns at Y12. The new report from the US Geological Survey says the risk in Oak Ridge is increased beyond what was believed in 2008. In fact, the increase is among the highest in the nation.”

    Ralph Hutchison, Coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, calling for a new Environmental Impact Statement at the Y12 nuclear weapons complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

     

    “The World Council of Churches central committee… calls on member churches and related ministries and networks to… support the lawsuit filed by the Marshall Islands against the nuclear-armed states at the International Court of Justice.”

    Statement from the World Council of Churches.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Elliot Serbin
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: June 2014

    Issue #203 – June 2014

    Facebook Twitter More...

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.

    • Perspectives
      • We Must End the Madness of Nuclear Weapons by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and David Krieger
      • The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Who Will Speak for the People? by Jody Williams and Bob Dodge
      • War Makes Us Poorer by Paul K. Chappell
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • U.S. Files Notice of Appearance in U.S. Federal District Court
      • Taking the Nuclear Powers to Court
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Nuclear Savage
      • B61 Nuclear Bomb Upgrade Reaches Milestone
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • Is Kitty Litter Responsible for Radiation Leak?
      • Air Force Flunks Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Nuclear Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Online Course on Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF Briefing Paper for the NPT PrepCom
      • Disarmament Education Report for the UN Secretary-General
      • Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • NAPF Peace Poetry Contest – Deadline July 1
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    We Must End the Madness of Nuclear Weapons

    Until now, no one has held nuclear-armed nations accountable for their continued possession of nuclear weapons. Last month, the Republic of the Marshall Islands courageously took the nine nuclear weapons-wielding Goliaths to the International Court of Justice to enforce compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty and customary international law.

    The people of the Marshall Islands are standing up to say that it’s time to end the era of nuclear madness. They are joined by Nobel Peace Laureates, and leaders and experts from every field who support this historic legal action.

    We call on President Obama and the leaders of the other nuclear weapon states to fulfill their legal obligation to negotiate in good faith to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons. It is not unrealistic to ask that the world’s most powerful governments start obeying the law and keeping their promises.

    Nothing good has ever come of nuclear weapons. Nothing good ever will. For the sake of all humanity, current and future, it’s time to respect the law and keep the promise.

    To read more, click here.

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Who Will Speak for the People?

    The U.N. just concluded the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Preparatory Committee with representatives from the 189 signatory nations and of civil society. The meeting was in preparation for next year’s NPT conference and to discuss the current status of fulfilling the obligations under the treaty and in particular, the mandate of the nuclear weapons states for global disarmament. The outcome was a continued foot dragging by the nuclear states motivating a demand for meaningful steps and progress toward disarmament by the other 184 nations in view of current international events.

    Recent scientific studies by the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War on the humanitarian consequences of limited nuclear war have shed additional light on the danger these weapons pose.  Describing a hypothetical conflict between India and Pakistan using less than ½ of 1 percent of the global nuclear arsenals, the studies confirm 2 billion people would be at risk of dying due to global climatic change.

    Combined with recent scandals involving U.S. ICBM missile controllers and a growing accounting of nuclear mishaps and near misses in our nuclear forces over the years, the sense of urgency for disarmament is greater than ever. It has become a question of who will step forward and speak for humanity.

    To read more, click here.

    War Makes Us Poorer

    When I began my senior year at West Point in August 2001, I took a class on national security that greatly influenced me. It was the first time I had seriously questioned the size of the U.S. military budget. My professor was a West Point graduate, Rhodes scholar, and major in the army. One day he walked in the classroom and wrote the names of eighteen countries on the board. He then looked at us and said, “The United States spends more on its military than the next eighteen countries in the world combined. Why do we need that much military spending? Isn’t that insane?”

    My professor then explained that immense war spending impoverishes the American people. None of the students in the class said anything. I was shocked by what he told us and did not know how to respond. Disturbed by our silence, he said, “I’m surprised you all aren’t more outraged by this. Why do we need that much military spending?”

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    U.S. Files Notice of Appearance in U.S. Federal District Court

     

    On May 29, 2014, the United States government filed the required “Notice of Appearance” with the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. on April 24, 2014 for breaches of Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Similar lawsuits were filed against all nine nuclear-armed nations (United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, North Korea) in the International Court of Justice.

    This filing demonstrates that the United States will indeed be appearing to defend itself and its agencies in court in this unprecedented lawsuit.

    Rick Wayman, “U.S. Government Files Official Notice of Appearance,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, May 29, 2014.

    Taking the Nuclear Powers to Court

     

    David Swanson, host of Talk Nation Radio and a key organizer in the World Beyond War movement, interviewed NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands. In this 30-minute interview, Rick addresses questions about why the Marshall Islands took this unprecedented action, what exactly is alleged in the lawsuits, and what to expect next.

    In a different interview, Blase Bonpane, Director of Office of the Americas, interviewed NAPF President David Krieger and NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg about the lawsuits. Click here for the interview on KPFK’s World Focus program.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Nuclear Savage

    An independent documentary entitled “Nuclear Savage,” yet to be shown on-air or online in the U.S., exposes for the first time solid evidence of U.S. knowledge regarding the lasting effects of nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands. Screenwriter and producer Adam Horowitz is unequivocal in asserting that the evidence conclusively shows that the contamination of the Marshall atolls wasn’t an accident, as the government previously claimed, but rather was the result of a premeditated, minutely planned, and cynically executed experiment to establish the long-term effects of radiation poisoning on humans.

    For instance, before insisting in 1957 that the island of Rongelap was safe for habitation, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission official Merril Eisenbud wrote, “That island is by far the most contaminated place on earth and it will be very interesting to get a measure of human uptake when people live in a contaminated environment.” The U.S. has been largely unresponsive to the islanders efforts to seek restitution. Beyond initial compensation of $150 million, the U.S. government has refused to recognize further responsibility for what it previously called an “accident.”

    “Getting the story told and in the public view is hard,” Horowitz says. “But it is an important story.”

    For more information on “Nuclear Savage” and to watch the preview, click here.

    Peter Calder, “America’s Shame: The N-bomb Guinea Pigs,” The New Zealand Herald, May 17, 2014.

    B61 Nuclear Bomb Upgrade Reaches Milestone

     

    Sandia National Laboratory reached a key milestone in upgrading the B61 nuclear bomb. Sandia conducted a week-long wind tunnel test to measure the nuclear bomb’s performance at the speed of sound.

    In one of the biggest projects Sandia has undertaken since the end of the Cold war, it is working with both the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the U.S. Air Force to extend the nuclear bomb’s lifetime by at least 20 years while adding new military capabilities.

    One of the recent changes includes advancing it from “dumb” to “smart” bomb via a new guided tail kit assembly. All current B61 models are gravity bombs to be dropped over targets. They currently do not have guidance systems that could pinpoint them for greater accuracy once released.

    Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons analyst with the Federation of American Scientists, has raised concerns about the modernization program, and the new tail kit for the B61 in particular. He said, “This is the first real nuclear bomb program after the Cold War that’s adding significant new capabilities. It raises the question, is the U.S. back in the nuclear bomb business?”

    Kevin Robinson-Avila, “Overhauling the Nation’s Nuclear Arsenal: Sandia National Labs Achieves B61 Milestone,” Albuquerque Journal, May 18, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    Is Kitty Litter Responsible for Radiation Leak?

     

    Officials at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico have been working to discover the cause of a radiation leak in February 2014 at the underground nuclear waste storage site, exposing at least 22 workers to elevated radiation levels. One theory now being investigated is whether kitty litter that was used to absorb moisture inside sealed barrels of nuclear waste caused a chemical reaction. Los Alamos National Laboratory, where the waste in question originated, switched from non-organic to organic kitty litter in 2013.

    There are at least 500 barrels of nuclear waste containing organic kitty litter scattered among three sites: a storage cavern a half-mile underground at WIPP; the grounds of Los Alamos National Lab; and a commercial disposal site in West Texas.

    Jeri Clausing, “Q&A: Is Cat Litter to Blame for Nuke Dump Leak?Associated Press, May 23, 2014.

    Air Force Flunks Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test

     

    Security forces at a U.S. Air Force base failed to speedily recover a stolen nuclear weapon in a drill conducted in 2013. According to an Air Force review of the event, the team showed an “inability to effectively respond to a recapture scenario” due to insufficient training and lack of familiarity with “complex scenario” exercises and shortcomings in “leadership culture.”

    The Air Force nuclear missile corps has faced a series of recent embarrassments, as reported in previous issues of the Sunflower newsletter. A Minuteman missile commander was removed from his post last October after the Pentagon concluded that he drank too much and cavorted with “suspect” women on an official trip to Russia. And in March 2014, the Air Force fired nine commanders at Malmstrom Air Force Base amid fallout from a cheating scandal.

    Noah Rayman, “Air Force Flunked Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test,” TIME, May 22, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Nuclear Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?

     

    Nearly half a century after the five declared nuclear-weapon states in 1968 pledged under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to “pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament,” all of the world’s nuclear-weapon states are busy modernizing their arsenals and continue to reaffirm the importance of such weapons.

    Perpetual nuclear modernization appears to undercut the promises made by the five NPT nuclear-weapon states. Without some form of limitations on the pace and scope of nuclear modernization, the goals of deep cuts in and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons remain elusive and appear increasingly unlikely as continued reaffirmation of the value of nuclear weapons, sustained by a global nuclear competition, threatens to extend the nuclear era indefinitely.

    Hans Kristensen, “Nuclear Weapons Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?Arms Control Today, May 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of June, including the failed launch of a NASA satellite, which dispersed plutonium into the upper atmosphere (April 21, 1964) and the massive radioactive release at Chernobyl (April 26, 1986).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Online Course on Nuclear Weapons: Environmental, Societal, and Health Effects

     

    Dr. Steven Starr, Senior Scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility and a NAPF Associate, is teaching an online course through the University of Missouri entitled “Nuclear Weapons: Environmental, Societal, and Health Effects.”

    According to Dr. Starr, “The course is fairly comprehensive but is designed to be accessible to those who do not already know a great deal about the subject. I think the class would be of great benefit to, among others, activists who wish to learn more about the historical and technical aspects of nuclear weapons.”

    You do not have to be a University of Missouri student to register for this online course. The class begins on June 2, so don’t wait to register. For more information, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF Briefing Paper for the NPT PrepCom

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation published a briefing paper for the Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepCom, which met at the United Nations in New York from April 28 to May 9, 2014. The briefing paper is entitled “The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Bold Action to Enforce Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.”

    The briefing paper gives a summary of the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands against all nine nuclear-armed nations, followed by a copy of the application filed against the United Kingdom in the International Court of Justice.

    To download a copy of the briefing paper, click here.

    Disarmament Education Report for the UN Secretary-General

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has submitted a report on its nuclear disarmament education efforts over the past two years to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

    The NAPF report is added to the work of other non-governmental organizations around the world and is submitted by the Secretary-General to the United Nations General Assembly every two years.

    Click here to download a copy of NAPF’s report.

    Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    On August 6, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will participate in two events commemorating the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively.

    NAPF’s 21st Annual Sadako Peace Day will be held at La Casa de Maria in Montecito, California, at 6:00 p.m. This year’s featured speaker is NAPF Board member Robert Laney.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will attend a commemoration event at the gates of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where many U.S. nuclear weapons have been designed and developed. The theme of this year’s Bay Area commemoration event is “Failure to Disarm.” Rick has been invited to speak about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, which directly address the failure of all nine nuclear-armed nations to disarm.

    More information about both of these important commemoration events will appear in the July edition of The Sunflower.

    NAPF Poetry Contest Deadline is July 1

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s annual poetry contest is now accepting entries. The Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards are an annual series of awards to encourage poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. The Poetry Awards include three age categories: Adult, Youth 13-18, and Youth 12 & Under.

    For more information about the contest, including a full list of rules and instructions on how to enter, click here. The deadline for entries is July 1.

    Quotes

     

    “History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage doesn’t need to be lived again.”

    Maya Angelou, who passed away in May 2014. Her quote is featured in the NAPF book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “The Abe Cabinet’s maneuvers for the exercise of the right to collective self-defense and creating the war-fighting system will not only destroy the Constitutional pacifism, which has ensured peace and safety of Japanese citizens, but lead to the escalation of the vicious cycle of tension in East Asia. We must stop this dangerous move in cooperation with all peace-loving people both in Japan and the rest of the world.”

    Yasui Masakazu, Secretary General of the Japan Council Against A and H Bombs (Gensuikyo). He is referring to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s desire to re-interpret Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution.

     

    “We call for urgent negotiations on a treaty to ban the use, manufacture, stockpiling and possession of nuclear weapons as a first step towards their complete eradication.”

    — From a motion adopted by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) World Congress on May 23, 2014.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger

    Grant Stanton

    Wakana Suzuki

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: May 2014

    Sunflower Newsletter: Special Lawsuit Edition

    Issue #202 – May 2014

    Facebook Twitter More...

    On April 24, 2014, the Republic of the Marshall Islands filed lawsuits against all nine nuclear-armed nations for failure to negotiate nuclear disarmament. The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has stood by the side of the Marshall Islands and played an important role as their consultant in the “Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.” This issue of The Sunflower is intended to give readers more in-depth information about the lawsuits and is dedicated to the courageous leaders of the Marshall Islands who filed these lawsuits.

    To learn more about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, click here.

    • Perspectives
      • The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Taking Nuclear Weapons to Court by David Krieger
      • Speech at the Non-Proliferation Treaty Preparatory Committee by Tony de Brum
      • Russia and the US Respond to Nuclear Zero Lawsuits by Rick Wayman
      • Comments from a Nuclear Zero Lawyer by Phon van den Biesen
    • Selected Media Coverage of the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Television: Fox News
      • Newspaper: Associated Press
      • Radio: Voice of Russia
      • Online: Slate
    • Resources
      • Be a Hero for Nuclear Zero – Sign the petition
      • A Guide for NGOs and Campaigners
      • Copies of All Ten Lawsuits
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Taking Nuclear Weapons to Court

    Given the extreme dangers of nuclear weapons, we might ask: why isn’t more being done to eliminate them?  There has been talk and promises, but little action by the nine nuclear-armed nations – United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea.  All nine countries are modernizing their nuclear arsenals.

    One small Pacific nation, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, has decided to take legal action against the nine nuclear-armed countries, which are threatening our common future.  As Tony de Brum, Foreign Minister of the Marshall Islands, points out, “The continued existence of nuclear weapons and the terrible risk they pose to the world threatens us all.”

    The Marshall Islands is taking its case to the International Court of Justice in The Hague and, in addition, filing against the U.S. separately in U.S. Federal District Court in San Francisco.  The lawsuits argue that the nuclear disarmament obligations apply to all nine nuclear-armed states as a matter of customary international law.  The courts are being asked to declare that the nuclear weapon states are in breach of their obligations under international law and order them to begin negotiating in good faith to achieve a cessation of the nuclear arms race and a world with zero nuclear weapons.

    To read more, click here.

    Speech at the Non-Proliferation Treaty Preparatory Committee

    Tony de Brum, Foreign Minister of the Marshall Islands, delivered this speech at the opening session of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Preparatory Committee on April 28, 2014.

    Ministers and Disarmament Ambassadors and experts have gathered here from around the world with the serious responsibility to achieve ultimate disarmament under the NPT – but I must ask how many people in this room, here today, have personally witnessed nuclear detonations?

    I, for one, have – I am a nuclear witness and my memories from Likiep atoll in the northern Marshalls are strong. I lived there as a young boy for the entire 12 years of the nuclear testing program, and when I was 9 years old, I remember vividly the white flash of the Bravo detonation on Bikini atoll, 6 decades ago in 1954, and one thousand times more powerful than Hiroshima – and an event that truly shocked the international community into action.

    Disarmament is only possible with political will – we urge all nuclear weapons states to intensify efforts to address their responsibilities in moving towards an effective and secure disarmament. The Marshall Islands affirms important bilateral progress amongst nuclear powers – but further underscores that this still falls short of the NPT’s collective and universal purpose. International law – and legal obligations – are not hollow and empty words on a page, but instead the most serious form of duty and commitment between nations, and to our collective international purpose.

    It is for this reason why I have participated as a co-agent in recent filings at the International Court of Justice and elsewhere against the world’s major nuclear powers. Those that make binding obligations within international treaties, and those who are bound by customary international law, must and will be held accountable for the pursuit of those commitments and obligations.

    To read more, click here.

    You can also watch a video of Tony de Brum’s speech that he delivered later the same day during NAPF’s lunchtime event at the United Nations in New York. Click here to watch the video.

    Russia and the U.S. Respond to Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Very little has been said thus far about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits by representatives of the offending nations. However, the Russian Foreign Ministry did issue a statement about the lawsuit. One excuse they made is: “Russia has reduced its strategic nuclear potential by more than 80 percent and its non-strategic nuclear weapons by three-quarters from their peak numbers.”

    Given what is widely known about the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, it is inexcusable for any nation to maintain an arsenal of any size. Perhaps Russia does not realize this because it actively chose to boycott the conferences on humanitarian impacts organized by Norway in 2013 and Mexico in 2014. Russia’s continued boycotting of multilateral initiatives for nuclear disarmament (including the Open-Ended Working Group) demonstrates a lack of good faith effort.

    The U.S. State Department also released a short statement about the lawsuits, saying, “The U.S. is dedicated to achieving the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons, consistent with our obligations under the [NPT].”

    This might be the first time the Obama administration has written the words “peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons” and not immediately followed it with some version of “not in my lifetime.” If the U.S. is dedicated to a world without nuclear weapons, why is it modernizing its nuclear arsenal and planning which nuclear weapons it will deploy in the 22nd century?

    To read more, click here.

    Comments from a Nuclear Zero Lawyer

    On April 24, in my capacity as Co-Agent of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), I submitted nine Applications to the International Court of Justice against each of the nine states possessing nuclear weapons.  The legal team advised the RMI that this was an entirely responsible thing to do given the state of the law today.

    In litigation, breach of contract is one of the common grounds to sue. This is not different in international litigation. If any one State is not getting what it is entitled to, based on a contract, a treaty or norms of customary international law, in spite of the clarity of the language in which the obligations are stated, there comes a day that such a State will stop requesting politely and will bring the State that is not delivering to Court. Since July 1996, some three quarters of the UN General Assembly have, indeed and over and over again, been asking politely for a beginning of negotiations leading to leading to an early conclusion of a convention prohibiting and eliminating nuclear weapons.  However, most of the nuclear armed States wouldn’t have it and ignored the polite request. And so these cases are now in Court.

    To read more, click here.

    Click here to watch a video of Phon van den Biesen’s comments at the NAPF lunchtime event at the United Nations on April 28, 2014.

    Selected Media Coverage of Lawsuits

    Television: Fox News

    On April 24, Laurie Ashton, Counsel to the Republic of the Marshall Islands on the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, appeared on Fox News with Shepard Smith. Fox News has the largest viewing audience of any U.S. news station during the middle of the day when this report aired.

    Marshall Islands Launch Lawsuit Against Nuclear Nations,” Fox News, April 24, 2014.

    Newspaper: Associated Press

    The tiny Pacific nation of the Marshall Islands is taking on the United States and the world’s eight other nuclear-armed nations with an unprecedented lawsuit demanding that they meet their obligations toward disarmament and accusing them of “flagrant violations” of international law.

    The island group that was used for dozens of U.S. nuclear tests after World War II filed suit Thursday against each of the nine countries in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands. It also filed a federal lawsuit against the United States in San Francisco, naming President Barack Obama, the departments and secretaries of defense and energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration.

    “I personally see it as kind of David and Goliath, except that there are no slingshots involved,” David Krieger, President of the California-based Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, told The Associated Press. He is acting as a consultant in the case.

    The country is seeking action, not compensation. It wants the courts to require that the nine nuclear-armed states meet their obligations.

    Cara Anna, “Tiny Pacific Nation Sues Nine Nuclear-Armed Powers,” The Associated Press, April 24, 2014.

    Radio: Voice of Russia

    Rick Wayman, NAPF Director of Programs, and Laurie Ashton, Counsel to the Marshall Islands, appeared on Voice of Russia radio to discuss the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits. Ashton explained that the premise of the Marshall Islands’ claims is that the nuclear-armed nations have failed to engage in negotiations to end the nuclear arms race at an early date and have not had negotiations about complete nuclear disarmament. She said, “In fact, in the 44-year history of the treaty such negotiations have never been convened.”

    Wayman said that the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation along with other prominent anti-nuclear weapons organizations had started an advocacy campaign to support the Marshall Islands called “Nuclear Zero.”

    Sean Nevins, “Marshall Islands Sue Nuclear States for Complete Disarmament,” Voice of Russia, April 25, 2014.

    Online: Slate

    In an intriguing case, the Marshall Islands – a Pacific Island nation of about 68,000 people – filed suit in the International Court of Justice at the Hague against the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations over their failure to work toward eliminating these weapons. A separate U.S. federal lawsuit was also filed in a court in San Francisco against President Barack Obama, the secretaries of defense and energy, and the National Nuclear Security Administration.

    “Our people have suffered the catastrophic and irreparable damage of these weapons, and we vow to fight so that no one else on earth will ever again experience these atrocities,” said Marshallese Foreign Minister Tony de Brum.

    Laurie Ashton, one of the American attorneys representing the country in the suit, said that measures such as the New START Treaty, under which the United States and Russia agreed to reductions of their nuclear arsenals, don’t pass muster.

    “Reducing certain categories of arms does not satisfy the obligation to cease the nuclear arms rate,” she said. “If you’re reducing certain categories of your arms while you are modernizing and creating weapons in other categories, you’re still arms racing. Secondly, the Non-Proliferation Treaty calls for good-faith negotiations on complete nuclear disarmament, and the United States as refused to even call for such negotiations.”

    Joshua Keating, “Why the Marshall Islands Is Suing the World’s Nuclear Powers,” Slate, April 25, 2014.

    Resources

    Be a Hero for Nuclear Zero: Sign the Petition

     

    Add your voice to support the courageous action by the Marshall Islands to hold the nine nuclear-armed nations accountable for nuclear disarmament. Go to www.nuclearzero.org, where you can sign the petition, learn more about the Marshall Islands and the lawsuits, and share the good news with your friends.

    Zero is the only safe number of nuclear weapons in the world. The leaders of many nations know this, but until now, no country has been willing to stand up to the “Nuclear Nine.” Let the Marshall Islands know that you think they made the right decision, and let the leaders of the Nuclear Nine know that you demand that they negotiate for nuclear disarmament.

    A Guide for NGOs and Campaigners

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has published a 12-page guide as a resource for non-governmental organizations and campaigners around the world who support the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits. The guide contains a summary of the lawsuits, frequently asked questions, a sample article and press release, and suggested social media content.

    To download a copy of the guide, click here.

    Click here to watch a short video of NAPF President David Krieger explaining how individuals and organizations can help support the Marshall Islands in this campaign.

    Copies of All Ten Lawsuits

     

    The Marshall Islands filed nine separate applications in the International Court of Justice – one for each of the nine nuclear-armed nations. They filed an additional lawsuit against the United States in U.S. Federal District Court.

    Click here to download all of the filings.

    Quotes

     

    “The failure of these nuclear-armed countries to uphold important commitments and respect the law makes the world a more dangerous place. We must ask why these leaders continue to break their promises and put their citizens and the world at risk of horrific devastation. This is one of the most fundamental moral and legal questions of our time.”

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace Laureate and member of the NAPF Advisory Council, speaking about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

     

    “The continuing recalcitrance displayed by the nine nuclear weapon states not to disarm as promised in the NPT places life on earth on the cusp of annihilation every second of every day. The world is in a perpetual state of psychic numbing edging unconsciously as lemmings towards the cliff of nuclear extinction.”

    Dr. Helen Caldicott, member of the NAPF Advisory Council, speaking about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

     

    “These applications to the International Court of Justice constitute an action by one friend to remind another to abide by its legal obligations to secure a world of peace, free of nuclear weapons. It is the least we can do for our children and other living things on Earth.”

    Tony de Brum, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, speaking about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

     

    “Nuclear weapons – the antithesis of humankind’s yearning for peace – should have no place in a world community determined to achieve mutual security on a global scale.”

    H.E. Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations, in a statement delivered at the 2014 Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepCom.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman

     

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: July 2014

    Issue #204 – July 2014

    Facebook Twitter More... The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • Accountability for the War in Iraq by David Krieger
      • The Emotional and Psychological Trauma to Our People Can’t Be Measured In Real Terms by Lia Petridis Maiello
      • Stop Calling the Iraq War a Mistake by Dennis Kucinich
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • U.S. Conference of Mayors Pass Sweeping Resolution on Nuclear Disarmament
      • NuclearZero.org Now in Japanese
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Air Force Lobbies for New Nuclear Bombers
      • Empowering Nuclear Missile Officers
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • U.S. and UK to Renew Nuclear Weapon Partnership
      • U.S. Jets Intercept Russian Nuclear Bombers
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • China Complains About Japanese Plutonium
      • New Method for Detecting Nuclear Warheads
    • War and Peace
      • U.S. Rejects Draft Treaty Banning Space Weapons
      • Article 9 Protest in Japan
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Plan Your Action for Nuclear Abolition Day
      • Against the Tide
    • Foundation Activities
      • Paul Chappell Gives Keynote Address at Model UN Conference in Germany
      • Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • Youth Video Contest Announced
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Accountability for the War in Iraq

    The current level of violence in Iraq has a single root: the destabilizing act in 2003 of illegally invading and then occupying Iraq ordered by the George W. Bush administration, with their arrogant claims that US troops would be greeted as liberators. Rather than liberating Iraq, however, our country lost yet another war there, one which left thousands of American soldiers dead, tens of thousands wounded and still more traumatized. We also destabilized the region; slaughtered and displaced Iraqis; left Iraq in a mess; created the conditions for a civil war there; strengthened Iran; created many new advocates of al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations; and demonstrated disdain for international law.

    The Bush administration led and lied the US into an aggressive war, the kind of war held to be a crime against peace at Nuremberg.  The lying was despicable, an impeachable offense, but it is too late for the impeachment of a president and vice-president who are now out of office.  The initiation of an aggressive war was an act, however, for which there should always be accountability, as there was at Nuremberg.  This, of course, would require having the courage and principle as a country to create policies to hold our own leaders to the same standards that we held those leaders whom we defeated in combat.

    To read more, click here.

    The Emotional and Psychological Trauma to Our People Can’t Be Measured In Real Terms

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands in the northern Pacific Ocean is not only a breathtakingly beautiful island state, but has recently moved into the public eye by starting a bold initiative that is widely interpreted as a “David against Goliath” undertaking.

    The Marshall islands were subjected to dozens of nuclear tests, carried out by the U.S. after 1945. According to the Associated Press, the island group filed suit in late April against each of the nine nuclear-armed powers in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands. It also filed a federal lawsuit against the United States in San Francisco.

    The Foreign Minister of the Marshall Islands, Tony de Brum, explains in an interview the impact the nuclear tests had and still have for the citizens of the Marshall Islands and what he hopes these lawsuits can achieve for the island state and the world community.

    To read more, click here.

    Stop Calling the Iraq War a Mistake

    As Iraq descends into chaos again, more than a decade after “Mission Accomplished,” media commentators and politicians have mostly agreed upon calling the war a “mistake.” But the “mistake” rhetoric is the language of denial, not contrition: it minimizes the Iraq War’s disastrous consequences, removes blame, and deprives Americans of any chance to learn from our generation’s foreign policy disaster. The Iraq War was not a “mistake” – it resulted from calculated deception. The painful, unvarnished fact is that we were lied to. Now is the time to have the willingness to say that.

    In fact, the truth about Iraq was widely available, but it was ignored. There were no WMD. Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. The war wasn’t about liberating the Iraqi people. I said this in Congress in 2002. Millions of people who marched in America in protest of the war knew the truth, but were maligned by members of both parties for opposing the president in a time of war – and even leveled with the spurious charge of “not supporting the troops.”

    I’ve written and spoken widely about this topic, so today I offer two ways we can begin to address our role.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    U.S. Conference of Mayors Pass Sweeping Resolution on Nuclear Disarmament

    On June 23, 2014, the U.S Conference of Mayors (USCM) unanimously adopted a sweeping new resolution “Calling for Constructive Good Faith U.S. Participation in International Nuclear Disarmament Forums” at its 82nd annual meeting in Dallas.

    The resolution also expresses support for the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands. It says, “[USCM] commends the Republic of the Marshall Islands for calling to the world’s attention the failure of the nine nuclear-armed states to comply with their international obligations to pursue negotiations for the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons, and calls on the U.S. to respond constructively and in good faith to the lawsuits brought by the RMI.”

    Responding to the adoption of the resolution, Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony de Brum said, “This endorsement is acknowledged with deep gratitude on behalf of the Government and the People of the Marshall Islands, and most especially those who have lost loved ones in the mad race for nuclear superiority, and those who continue to suffer the scourge of nuclear weapons testing in our homeland.”

    U.S. Conference of Mayors Adopts Bold Resolution on Nuclear Disarmament,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, June 26, 2014.

    NuclearZero.org Now in Japanese

    NuclearZero.org, the campaign website for the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, is now available in Japanese. Our friends in the youth division of Soka Gakkai International (SGI) will be launching a Nuclear Zero petition drive in Japan during the first week of July, and the Nuclear Zero website makes a perfect companion for this effort.

    The Japanese version of the website is at www.nuclearzero.org/jp. For those of you who do not read Japanese, you can check out the English-language version of the website and sign the petition in support of the Marshall Islands at www.nuclearzero.org.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Air Force Lobbies for New Nuclear Bombers

    Maj. Gen. Garrett Harencak, the Air Force assistant chief of staff for strategic deterrence and nuclear integration, defended plans to update the U.S. long-range bomber fleet. According to Harencak, the new long-range bombers would have “persistent, long-range strike capabilities that provide practical alternatives for global security.” The Air Force hopes to deploy 100 of the new bombers by 2025.

    Amid questions about the necessity of the project and the relevancy of the nation’s bombers, Harencak argued that bombers are still needed to protect American interests and that the current fleet, which includes the 50 year-old B-52, is inadequate.

    Air Force General Presses Case for Future Nuclear Bomber,” Global Security Newswire, June 19, 2014.

    Empowering Nuclear Missile Officers

    Maj. Gen. Jack Weinstein, commander of the U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile force, said that nuclear missile officers have been suffering from low morale in part because they were being “micromanaged.”

    “The best way to produce leaders of the future is to make sure that when they are junior you properly educate and train them and you let them make decisions,” he said.

    However, Col. Robert Vercher, who stepped down in June as commander of the 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base, disagreed. Vercher said, “You might call it micromanagement, but I would call it oversight – proper oversight. When I hear the word ‘micromanagement,’ I go, ‘It depends.’ How much do you want your tax return micromanaged by your accountant? Exquisitely or just kind of haphazardly?”

    Robert Burns, “AP Interview: AF Should Empower Young Nuke Leaders,” Associated Press, June 25, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    U.S. and UK to Renew Nuclear Weapon Partnership

    Britain is increasing its partnership with the United States to design new nuclear warheads, according to documents released in the UK under the freedom of information act. The Mutual Defense Agreement (MDA) was originally signed by the two countries in 1958. It is expected to be renewed within the next few weeks.

    One document describes the MDA as an agreement that enables Britain and the U.S. “nuclear warhead communities to collaborate on all aspects of nuclear deterrence including nuclear warhead design and manufacture.”

    Peter Burt of Nuclear Information Service, who obtained the papers, said, “The UK and U.S. are setting a dreadful example to the rest of the world by renewing the MDA, and are seriously undermining the credibility of international efforts to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons.”

    He added: “If Iran and North Korea had signed a similar agreement for the transfer of nuclear weapons technology, the UK and U.S. would be branding them pariah nations and screaming for the toughest of international sanctions to be imposed.”

    Richard Norton-Taylor, “Exclusive: UK to Step Up Collaboration with US Over Nuclear Warheads,” The Guardian, June 12, 2014.

    U.S. Jets Intercept Russian Nuclear Bombers

    On June 9, U.S. military jets intercepted four Russian bombers as they flew close to the Aleutian Islands in Alaska as well as the coast of Northern California. The Russian Tu-95 Bear H bombers, which can be equipped with nuclear-armed cruise missiles, appear to have been participating in a training exercise.

    While it is not unusual for such long-range practice runs to occur, the timing of the training exercise came during a particularly contentious time as Russia and the U.S. square off over the crisis in Ukraine. The U.S. has deployed nuclear-capable bombers to Europe to participate in training exercises with NATO.

    U.S. Jets Intercept Russian Bombers Near Alaska,” Global Security Newswire, June 12, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    China Complains About Japanese Plutonium

    China has complained that Japan failed to disclose 640 kilograms of plutonium in its possession to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Hua Chunying, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, stated that Japan has a duty to report its plutonium to the IAEA and questioned whether this failure to report was “an unintentional omission or a deliberate concealment.” The Japan Atomic Energy Commission acknowledged that the plutonium, stored in an offline reactor at Genkai nuclear plant in Saga Prefecture, was omitted from its report out of a belief that the material was “exempt from IAEA reporting requirements.”

    Japan’s storage of nuclear material has often raised concerns in China, including the worry that Japan may eventually break away from its policy of refraining from nuclear weapon development. With a plutonium supply of more than 44 tons, Japan maintains the largest plutonium stockpile of any country without nuclear weapons. It takes approximately 4 kilograms of plutonium to make a nuclear weapon.

    Austin Ramzy, “China Complains About Plutonium in Japan,” The New York Times, June 10, 2014.

    New Method for Detecting Nuclear Warheads

    Scientists from Princeton University and the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory have invented a new method for inspectors to detect nuclear warheads without access to classified information. Inspectors would beam high-energy neutrons though a warhead and use a detector on the other side to measure the number of neutrons that pass through. They would then compare this result to the number that typically pass through a non-nuclear target.

    Physicist Andrew Glaser, first author of the study, said that the method would allow inspectors to determine “true nuclear warheads” while “learning nothing about the materials and design of the warhead itself.” If this “zero-knowledge protocol” proves effective, it could help advance the inspections process as part of the New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia. Both countries have agreed to reduce their deployed strategic nuclear arsenals to 1,550 weapons each by 2018.

    Mary-Ann Russon, “Scientists Invent New Way to Spot Nuclear Warheads Using Physics,” International Business Times, June 25, 2014.

    War and Peace

    U.S. Rejects Draft Treaty Banning Space Weapons

    A new draft treaty designed to limit the weaponization of space was introduced by China and Russia into the United Nations and met with opposition from the United States. The proposal, an update of the 2008 draft, would place “legally binding curbs on weapons in space.” The U.S., citing the lack of an effective verification system to monitor compliance in the UN draft, instead favors a less formal “code of conduct” being pushed by the European Union.

    Bill Gertz, “U.S. Opposes New Draft Treaty from China and Russia Banning Space Weapons,” The Washington Free Beacon, June 19, 2014.

    Article 9 Protest in Japan

    A man set himself on fire in protest of the Japanese government’s attempts to reinterpret Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution to allow the military to be used against other nations. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe believes that Article 9 unfairly restricts Japan from exercising its right to self-defense. Article 9 currently outlaws war as a means to settle international disputes.

    The Article 9 decision is extremely controversial in Japan, with proponents of the pacifist constitution saying that reinterpreting the Constitution will more easily allow wars to take place. Japan is currently embroiled in a serious territorial dispute with China over the islands known to the Japanese as the Senkakus and to the Chinese as the Diaoyus.

    Japanese Man Self-Immolates in Pro-Pacifist Constitution Protest,” RT, June 29, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of July, including the first U.S. atmospheric nuclear weapon test in the Marshall Islands (July 1, 1946) and U.S. Strategic Command’s “Waging [Nuclear] Deterrence in the 21st Century” conference (July 29-30, 2009).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Plan Your Action for Nuclear Abolition Day

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) is coordinating a worldwide day of action against nuclear weapons on September 26, 2014. The United Nations General Assembly has declared September 26 the “International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.”

    ICAN is asking people around the world to organize actions in their own countries to highlight the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons and to call for a treaty banning nuclear weapons. For ideas and resources to help you plan your activity, visit the ICAN website.

    Against the Tide

    The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) has published a new report entitled “Against the Tide: Why the Trident Commission’s Views Are Outdated and Out of Touch.” In the report, CND argues that the Trident Commission should have listened to the majority of the British people who oppose Trident replacement and the overwhelming majority internationally who want to see a world free of these monstrous and outdated weapons. Instead the Commission has produced a rehash of Cold War thinking that fails to acknowledge that the world has moved on.

    CND argues that cancelling the program to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system is a pragmatic and realistic alternative.

    To download a copy of CND’s report, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Paul Chappell Gives Keynote Address at Model UN in Germany

    With the conference title “World Peace, Our Present Task, Our Future Aim,” the Oldenburg Model United Nations/OLMUN 2014 took place June 24-27, 2014 in Oldenburg, Germany. NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell was keynote speaker on the opening night of the conference. Chappell spoke to over 700 high school students from Germany and other European countries on “Why World Peace Is Possible.”

    Paul argued that politicians manipulate soldiers by dehumanizing opponents in order to make them fight in war. He concludes that human beings are naturally peaceful and afraid of war and physical and psychological violence. This leads to his opinion that we can all have realistic hope for a peaceful future.

    For more information on this event, click here.

    Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    On August 6, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will participate in three events commemorating the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively.

    NAPF’s 21st Annual Sadako Peace Day will be held at La Casa de Maria in Montecito, California, at 6:00 p.m. This year’s featured speaker is NAPF Board member Robert Laney. The event is free and open to the public.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will attend a commemoration event at the gates of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), where many U.S. nuclear weapons have been designed and developed. A whopping 89% of LLNL’s budget request for 2015 is for nuclear weapon activities.  The theme of this year’s Bay Area commemoration event is “Failure to Disarm.” Rick has been invited to speak about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, which directly address the failure of all nine nuclear-armed nations to disarm. For more information on the Bay Area event, click here.

    Rick will also participate in a webinar hosted by Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) on August 6 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. He will be discussing the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, and will be joined by a woman from the Marshall Islands who has suffered the effects of the U.S. nuclear weapons tests. The webinar is free and open to the public. More information and a registration link will be provided in the August issue of The Sunflower.

    Youth Video Contest Announced

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is working with Tri-Valley CAREs, a non-profit organization based in Livermore, California, on a new youth video contest. Contestants will address the topic: “Six Decades of Nuclear Bombs at Livermore Lab: Tell Us Why a Clean Environment Is Important to You.”

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is one of the two main nuclear weapons design and research laboratories in the United States. Every nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal was designed at either Livermore or Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico. Operating this lab in Livermore, California for six decades has taken a serious toll on the local environment. In fact, the lab has released over 1 million curies of radiation into the local environment.

    The contest is open to people around the world. The deadline for submissions is October 31, 2014.

    For more information about the contest, click here.

    Quotes

     

    “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”

    The Russell-Einstein Manifesto, which was issued on July 9, 1955. This quote is featured in the NAPF book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “This isn’t about your job. It’s about materials with the power to taint land, air and water — to poison and kill living things — for tens of thousands of years. PR baby-talk can’t alter that deadly serious fact.”

    Sasha Pyle and Joni Arends, in an op-ed opposing the proposed rushed re-opening of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico. A serious radiation leak at WIPP in February 2014 has shut down the facility. Investigators are still unsure as to the exact cause of the radiation leak, which exposed at least 21 workers to elevated radiation levels.

     

    “Once again this year, the nuclear weapon-possessing states took little action to indicate a genuine willingness to work toward complete dismantlement of their nuclear arsenals.”

    Shannon Kile and Phillip Patton Schell, referencing the new annual nuclear forces data report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

    Editorial Team

    David Krieger
    Rose Mertens
    Elliot Serbin
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter April 2014

    Issue #201 – April 2014

    Facebook Twitter More...

    In the next several weeks, we’ll be taking an exciting action that has never been seen before in the nuclear abolition movement. We need you to join us and spread the word! Please connect with us on Facebook and Twitter so you can have all the latest news and tools to join the courageous fight for a world free of nuclear weapons.

    • Perspectives
      • Ten Reasons Why Nukes Are Nuts by David Krieger
      • Ukraine and the Danger of Nuclear War by John Scales Avery
      • Jonathan Schell (1943-2014) by David Krieger
    • US Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Nuclear Weapons Budget Rises in Age of Austerity
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • NATO Using Crimea Crisis to Justify Continued Deployment of Nuclear Weapons
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • ICBM Scandal Intensifies
      • Activists Break Into Nuclear Weapons Base Before Nuclear Security Summit
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Japan Defends Decision to Stockpile Tons of Weapons-Usable Plutonium
    • Nuclear Testing
      • Israel Likely to Ratify Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • NPT Action Plan Monitoring Report
      • Join Us at DC Days in May
      • Help Restore the Golden Rule
    • Foundation Activities
      • Check Out the Re-designed WagingPeace.org
      • Humanity Needs You to Join the Other One Percent
      • Peace Leadership Around the Globe
      • NAPF at the Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepCom
      • NAPF Peace Poetry Contest – Deadline July 1
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Ten Reasons Why Nukes Are Nuts

    There are many reasons why nukes are nuts. Here are my top ten:

    They are insanely powerful. A single nuclear weapon can destroy a city. A few nuclear weapons can destroy a country. A relatively small regional nuclear war can cause a nuclear famine, taking 2 billion lives globally. An all-out nuclear war could end civilization and cause the extinction of most complex life on the planet.

    Nuclear weapons kill indiscriminately. Their effects cannot be contained in time or space. They are an equal-opportunity destroyer, killing and maiming men, women and children. The radioactive materials in nuclear weapons keep killing long after the blast, heat and fire of the explosive force have taken their toll. They are capable of causing genetic mutations and killing or injuring new generations of innocent victims, as was the case with the repeated US atmospheric nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands.

    To read more, click here.

    Ukraine and the Danger of Nuclear War

    The current situation in Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula is an extremely dangerous one. Unless restraint and a willingness to compromise are shown by all of the the parties involved, the crisis might escalate uncontrollably into a full-scale war, perhaps involving nuclear weapons. What is urgently required is for all the stakeholders to understand each other’s positions and feelings. Public understanding of the points of view of all sides is also very much needed.

    We in the West already know the point of view of our own governments from the mainstream media, because they tell us of nothing else. For the sake of balance, it would be good for us to look closely at the way in which the citizens of Russia and the Crimean Peninsula view recent events.

    To read more, click here.

    Jonathan Schell (1943-2014)

    I was saddened to learn of the recent death of Jonathan Schell, a distinguished writer and journalist and a long-time member of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s Advisory Council.  Jonathan was one of the most talented, thoughtful and moral writers of our time.  His first book, The Village of Ben Suc, published in 1967, reported on U.S. atrocities in Vietnam.  He went on to write many more important books, including The Fate of the Earth, in which he described in elegant prose the threat posed to humanity by nuclear weapons.  This 1982 book became a classic and in 1999 was selected by a panel of experts convened by New York University as one of the 20th century’s 100 best works of journalism.

    To read more, click here.

    US Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Nuclear Weapons Budget Rises in Age of Austerity

     

    Despite increasing austerity, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received a 7% increase in the Obama Administration’s FY2015 budget request. The NNSA is the semi-autonomous agency that builds and maintains U.S. nuclear weapons. While a 7% overall increase may not seem like much, consider this: the NNSA’s budget request for non-proliferation programs is down by 21%, and funding to dismantle nuclear weapons that have been taken out of service is down by 45%. Those “savings” — and then some — have been applied to programs to modernize many current U.S. nuclear weapons and facilities.

    Last month, companion bills were introduced in the House and Senate that would save $100 billion in the next ten years by reducing the number of nuclear weapons and cutting nuclear weapons spending. In the Senate, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced the Smarter Approach to Nuclear Expenditures (SANE) Act (S.2070). In the House of Representatives, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced the Reduce Expenditures in the Nuclear Infrastructure Now (REIN-IN) Act (H.R. 4107).

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation recently issued an action alert encouraging members of Congress to co-sponsor these bills. To take action, click here.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    NATO Using Crimea Crisis to Justify Continued Deployment of Nuclear Weapons

     

    Anders Fogh Rasmussen, General Secretary of NATO, has said that Russia’s annexation of Crimea may affect NATO tactical nuclear weapon reductions in Europe. NATO currently deploys approximately 180 U.S. nuclear weapons in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. Russia is thought to possess approximately 2,000 tactical nuclear weapons within its borders.

    The U.S. has also announced suspension of bilateral talks with Russia regarding improving understanding and cooperation around missile defense. U.S. and NATO missile defense deployment in Eastern Europe has been viewed by Russia as a serious threat for many years.

    Rachel Oswald, “NATO Chief Says Ukraine Events May Affect European Tactical Nuclear Reductions,” Global Security Newswire, March 20, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    ICBM Scandal Intensifies

     

    The ongoing scandal relating to drug use and cheating by U.S. nuclear missile launch officers continues to get bigger. In late March, nine commanders, representing nearly the entire operational chain of command in the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base, were fired and the wing commander, Col. Robert Stanley, was allowed to resign.

    One missile crew member was quoted as telling investigators, “Cheating has been going on for years; however, leadership pretends that cheating is not happening.” Another said, “Our squadron leadership was just another generation of cheaters.”

    Robert Burns, “Nuke Test Cheating Linked to Flawed Leadership,” Associated Press, March 28, 2014.

    Activists Break Into Nuclear Weapons Base Before Nuclear Security Summit

     

    Just days before the Nuclear Security Summit began in the Netherlands, four activists were arrested after breaking into Volkel Airbase, where U.S. nuclear weapons are kept under the guise of the NATO nuclear sharing agreement.  The activists entered a “secure” part of the base and took a photo of one of the bunkers in which U.S. B61 nuclear bombs are kept.

    The activists, part of a group called “Disarm,” explained in a statement that they wanted to raise awareness that the Netherlands continues to store nuclear weapons and that these weapons should have been given back to President Obama when he came to the country for the Nuclear Security Summit.

    Susi Snyder, “Four Dutch Activists Arrested at Volkel Airbase, Home to American Nuclear Bombs,” The Nuclear Resister, March 21, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Japan Defends Decision to Stockpile Tons of Weapons-Usable Plutonium

     

    As part of its “gift-basket” pledge at the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, Japan announced it would send hundreds of pounds of weapons-grade enriched uranium and plutonium back to the United States to be converted into a more proliferation-resistant form. Specifically, roughly 1,210 pounds of bomb-ready uranium and 730 pounds of separated plutonium will be sent to the U.S. While nonproliferation supporters applaud this action, they also note that this quantity of plutonium represents less than one percent of Japan’s worldwide stockpile and just 3.5 percent of the total domestic stockpile.

    Japan has long been criticized for its possession of what many have called “a bomb in the basement,” meaning that they could develop nuclear weapons within a matter of months should they decide to do so.

    Abe Defends Japan’s Management of Weapons-Grade Plutonium,” Kyodo News International, March 25, 2014.

    Nuclear Testing

    Israel Likely to Ratify Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

     

    In 1996, Israel signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which would ban all nuclear test explosions. Of the 183 countries that have signed the treaty, 162 have ratified it already.

    There remain eight countries that must ratify before the treaty can enter into force: Israel, Iran, Egypt, China, United States, India, North Korea and Pakistan. Lassina Zerbo, executive secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization, said that all eight of the holdout countries “are concerned about their own national security,” but argued that “the treaty can enhance the national security of all those countries.”

    David Horovitz, “Israel ‘Probably’ Next to Ratify Nuke Test Ban Treaty – Top Official,” The Times of Israel, March 19, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of April, including the failed launch of a NASA satellite, which dispersed plutonium into the upper atmosphere (April 21, 1964) and the massive radioactive release at Chernobyl (April 26, 1986).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    NPT Action Plan Monitoring Report

     

    Reaching Critical Will recently published the 2014 edition of its NPT Action Plan Monitoring Report. The report provides factual and clear information on the status of implementation of the three pillars of the NPT Action Plan agreed to in 2010. The report covers actions related to nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation, the Middle East WMD-Free Zone, the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, and more.

    To read the report, click here.

    Join Us at DC Days in May

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be participating in the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability’s DC Days for four days of training, advocacy and networking. Please join us and activists from all over the U.S. from May 18-21 to meet with members of Congress and the Obama administration and voice your concerns about nuclear weapons, power, and waste. This event offers a unique opportunity to develop advocacy skills and practice political activism.

    To learn more about ANA’s DC Days and to register, click here.

    Help Restore the Golden Rule

     

    Our friends at Veterans For Peace need your help to restore the Golden Rule, the world’s first anti-nuclear peace boat. In 1958, her brave crew of Quakers and pacifists risked their lives and freedom to nonviolently confront nuclear testing on the high seas. With your help, they will be able to honor their legacy and continue the mission.

    Horrified by ongoing open-air nuclear bomb tests and the threat of nuclear war, the four-man crew sailed the Golden Rule from California toward the Marshall Islands. They were arrested by the U.S. Coast Guard and prevented from reaching the nuclear testing area. The publicity surrounding their trial and imprisonment helped ignite public outrage against nuclear weapons testing and alerted the world to the health hazards of nuclear fallout.

    To learn more about the Golden Rule and how you can support its restoration, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Check Out the Re-designed WagingPeace.org

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is pleased to launch its re-designed website www.wagingpeace.org. The new site contains the hundreds of articles that we have published over the years, along with engaging content on nuclear weapons and peace. From the text of historic international treaties to a new Peace Store featuring a wide range of merchandise, the new WagingPeace.org has something for everyone.

    We encourage you to check our website often, as new content is added regularly.

    Humanity Needs You to Join the Other One Percent

     

    For the third consecutive year, NAPF will sponsor a Summer Peace Leadership training at La Casa de Maria Retreat Center in Santa Barbara from July 20-26, 2014. This year’s theme is: Humanity Needs You to Join the Other 1 Percent!

    NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell explains that less than 1% of the American population was actively involved in the women’s and civil rights movements, and less than 1% of the global population was actively involved in the movement to abolish state-sanctioned slavery.

    “It is only a tiny group of people who make positive change happen. This 1% must be well-trained, strategic, and creative. Just as soldiers are given excellent training in waging war, citizens must be given even better training in waging peace.”

    Positive change does not happen by itself. “We must make it happen.” Paul emphasizes the need to focus on Peace Leadership, to learn the form of leadership practiced by Gandhi and Marin Luther King Jr.

    “This will give us the strategic nonviolent and practical life skills that we need to wage peace in our personal lives, our communities, and throughout the world.”

    As a West Point graduate, Iraq war veteran, and former army captain, Paul brings the best of his West Point world-class leadership training and applies it to waging peace.

    Click here for more information and to apply for the summer course.

    Peace Leadership Around the Globe

     

    In March 2014, NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell delivered a series of lectures and trainings in the New York City area and in Northern Uganda. Paul met with, among others, high school students in New York City, religious groups, and people from South Sudan and Uganda traumatized by decades of continuous war.

    To read a summary of three key Peace Leadership events in March, click here.

    NAPF at the Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepCom

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will send a number of representatives to New York for the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) from April 28 – May 9 at the United Nations headquarters. Planned activities include a side event at the United Nations for countries and civil society entitled “Holding Nuclear Weapon States Accountable for Article VI of the NPT.” Article VI requires nuclear weapon states to negotiate in good faith for an end to the arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament.

    NAPF is also partnering with Soka Gakkai International to bring a group of young people to the PrepCom to meet with delegations and develop advocacy and diplomacy skills.

    Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for regular updates from inside the United Nations.

    Poetry in April and Throughout the Year

     

    April is National Poetry Month in the United States. To mark this occasion, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is offering all of its peace poetry books at 20% off during April. This includes our newest book, Summer Grasses: An Anthology of War Poetry, published in March 2014. You can also read all of NAPF’s peace poetry archives on our re-designed website.

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s annual poetry contest is now accepting entries. The Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards are an annual series of awards to encourage poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. The Poetry Awards include three age categories: Adult, Youth 13-18, and Youth 12 & Under.

    For more information about the contest, including a full list of rules and instructions on how to enter, click here. The deadline for entries is July 1.

    Quotes

     

    “The moral cost of nuclear armament is that it makes of all of us underwriters of the slaughter of hundreds of millions of people and of the cancellation of future generations.”

    Jonathan Schell, member of the NAPF Advisory Council, who passed away in March 2014. Schell’s quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “All I would want on my gravestone would be: ‘Here lies Tony Benn. He encouraged us.’”

    Tony Benn, former U.K. Member of Parliament and leader of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, who passed away in March 2014. He always encouraged us at NAPF to keep working for a nuclear weapon-free world.

    Editorial Team

     

    Scott Berzon

    Neil Fasching

    David Krieger

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman

     

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter March 2014

    Issue #200 – March 2014

    Facebook Twitter More...

    The Sunflower is a monthly e-newsletter providing educational information on nuclear weapons abolition and other issues relating to global security. Help us spread the word and forward this to a friend.

    Please donate to help sustain this valuable resource.

    Subscribe to the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s Sunflower newsletter and Action Alert Network.

    • Perspectives
      • Building the Morale of Missileers by David Krieger
      • Bravo: 60 Years of Suffering, Cover-Ups, Injustice by Beverly Deepe Keever
    • US Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. Begins Study on New Nuclear Cruise Missile
      • Members of Congress Introduce Legislation to Cut Nuclear Expenditures
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • Ukraine Gave up Its Soviet Nuclear Weapons in 1990s
      • Conference on Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons Marks Progress
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • ICBM Caucus Opposes Land-Based Missile Cuts
      • Peace Protestors Sentenced to Prison for Sabotage
      • Russia Tests Nuclear Missile Amidst Ukraine Crisis
    • Nuclear Waste
      • U.S. Nuclear Waste Workers Receive Internal Radiation Dose in Leak
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Nuremberg Prosecutor on Creating a Humane, Peaceful World
      • A Ban on Nuclear Weapons: What’s in it for NATO?
    • Foundation Activities
      • Help Us Expose the Truth About Nuclear Weapons
      • Native Ideals to Spark a New Peaceful Revolution
      • Noam Chomsky Delivers NAPF Lecture
      • Nukes Are Nuts Video Contest – Deadline April 1
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Building the Morale of Missileers

     

    A recent news story in the Global Security Newswire stated, “Top U.S. military leaders are personally reaching out to missileers at the Montana base that has become ground zero for an Air Force probe into exam cheating.” It went on, “Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Saturday called six launch officers during their shifts at underground launch control centers, according to a Pentagon press story. Speaking on the phone calls for roughly an hour, the defense chief voiced his assurance that the launch officers were up to the task of carrying out the U.S. nuclear mission, said Pentagon officials.” (Hagel, Air Force Brass Reach Out to Montana Missile Officers, GSN, February 4, 2014)

    One can only imagine what was said in those morale building talks.

    Hagel: Howdy, missileer, this is Chuck. How’s everything down in your bunker?

    Missile Launch Officer: Just fine, sir, lit up like a shopping mall. Chuck who?

    To read more, click here.

    Bravo: 60 Years of Suffering, Cover-Ups, Injustice

     

    Sixty years ago on March 1 in the heart of the Pacific Ocean, the United States detonated the most powerful nuclear weapon in its history.

    For these islanders, Bravo also ushered in 60 years of sufferings and a chain reaction of U.S. cover-ups and injustices, as detailed below. Over the decades, their pleas for just and adequate compensation and U.S. constitutional rights they had been promised were rejected by the U.S. courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, by Congress and by executive-branch administrations headed by presidents of either party.

    To read more, click here.

    US Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. Begins Study on New Nuclear Cruise Missile

     

    This July, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) will begin its formal study of the two potential warheads to be paired with new nuclear cruise missiles. The Air Force is currently working alongside the NNSA to determine if the W80 warhead, which is currently used in Air-Launched Cruise Missiles, or the W84 warhead, which was formerly used in Ground-Launched Cruise Missiles, is the best warhead for the new Long-Range Standoff Missile (LRSO). Either warhead would require a life-extension and improvement program to achieve the design and capability sought by the Pentagon.

    The Air Force and NNSA are expected to conclude the study by the summer of 2015, after which the LRSO program would award one or several technology development contracts to a prominent defense company, such as Lockheed Martin or Boeing. The goal of the formal study is to determine which warhead would undergo a life-extension program to modify and maintain the warheads for the new LRSO. This is to fulfill the desire that the new LRSOs are operational by the mid 2020s.

    “Air Force and NNSA To Select Nuclear Cruise Missile Warhead in Mid-2015,” Inside the Air Force, February 28, 2014.

    Members of Congress Introduce Legislation to Cut Nuclear Expenditures

     

    Senators Edward J. Markey (D-MA) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced a bill that would cut $100 billion from the current nuclear weapons budget over the next decade. The Smarter Approach to Nuclear Expenditures (SANE) Act would decrease the number of deployed strategic submarines from 14 to 8, reduce the purchase of replacement submarines from 12 to 8, cut warhead life extension programs, remove the nuclear mission from F-35s, and cancel nuclear weapon making facilities and missile defense programs. The authors of the bill believe that the U.S. must stop wasting money on outdated nuclear programs and prioritize the nation’s future by investing in things like education.

    While the SANE Act was proposed in the Senate, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) proposed the Reduce Expenditures in Nuclear Investments Now (REIN-IN) Act in the House of Representatives. Rep. Blumenauer argues that the bill is necessary because the United States cannot afford, nor does it need, such expensive weapons systems.

    Markey and Merkley Introduce Legislation to Cut Bloated Nuclear Weapons Budget,” Office of Sen. Ed Markey, February 28, 2014.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    Ukraine Gave up Its Soviet Nuclear Weapons in 1990s

     

    This year marks the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Trilateral Statement, the agreement that set the terms for eliminating the strategic nuclear weapons left on the territory of Ukraine when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. In return for giving up the world’s third largest nuclear arsenal (1,900 nuclear weapons) to Russia for dismantlement, Ukraine received:

    Security assurances. The United States, Russia and Britain would afford security assurances to Ukraine (i.e.: respect its independence and to abstain from economic intimidation).

    Compensation for highly-enriched uranium (HEU). “Russia agreed to provide fuel rods for Ukrainian nuclear reactors containing low enriched uranium equivalent to the HEU removed from the nuclear warheads transferred from Ukraine to Russia for dismantlement.”

    Elimination assistance. The United States would make accessible Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction assistance to cover the costs of eliminating the ICBMs and other nuclear infrastructure in Ukraine.

    Steven Pifer, “Getting Rid of Nukes: The Trilateral Statement at 20 Years,” The Brookings Institution, January 13, 2014.

    Conference on Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons Marks Progress

     

    The Second Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons, hosted by the Foreign Ministry of Mexico, concluded on February 14 with a plea for action to outlaw nuclear weapons ahead of the 70th anniversary in 2015 of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    Representatives of over 140 countries attended the conference, as well as many civil society groups, including three representatives from the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Issues discussed at the conference included the mounting danger of nuclear weapons use globally because of their “proliferation and vulnerability to cyberattacks, human error and potential access to nuclear arsenals by terrorist groups.” The conference reiterated that a nuclear weapon detonation would have effects not constrained by national borders, most severely affecting the poor and vulnerable. Atomic bomb survivors also attended to share their stories and speak against the continued existence of nuclear weapons.

    Confab Calls for Action to Outlaw Nukes before 70th Anniversary of Bombings,” Japan Times, February 16, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    ICBM Caucus Opposes Land-Based Missile Cuts

     

    A group of lawmakers from states that host land-based strategic nuclear missiles (Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming) are concerned the Pentagon could be studying closing down some of the weapon silos. Multiple letters from both chambers of Congress have been directed to U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, demanding to know whether his department is conducting environmental studies relating to Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs).

    Opponents of the possible reduction of the ICBM silos claim that the missiles are “vital to promoting peace and keeping our country and allies safe from current and emerging threats.” They included in their letter to the Pentagon that, “We are also concerned that beginning an ICBM environmental assessment could significantly damage the morale of airmen working on this crucial mission.”

    This defense of land-based nuclear missiles comes at a time when at least 92 out of 500 missile officers are being investigated in a cheating scandal, and many officers report feeling “burned out.”

    Rachel Oswald, “Lawmakers from Missile States Worry Pentagon Is Studying Closing Silos,” Global Security Newswire, February 21, 2014.

    Peace Protestors Sentenced to Prison for Sabotage

     

    Sister Megan Rice, an 84-year-old nun, has been sentenced to nearly three years in prison for breaking into the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, previously known as the “Fort Knox of uranium.” The ability of Rice and two other activists, Greg Boertje-Obed and Michael Walli, to break into the plant raised serious questions about security, as the facility holds the nation’s primary supply of bomb-grade uranium. Greg Boertje-Obed and Michael Walli were each sentenced to 62 months in prison for their nonviolent action.

    In her closing statement, Rice told the judge, “Please have no leniency with me. To remain in prison for the rest of my life would be the greatest gift you could give me.” For Rice, prison was preferable to living in a country where the government spends too much on the military and weapons.

    Commenting on the sentencing, NAPF President David Krieger said, “Rather than receiving jail sentences, Sister Megan and her colleagues should be honored not only for their exceptional courage, but for exposing the inadequate state of the security of the U.S. nuclear weapons complex. The government has to stop acting as though it is all right to threaten the mass murder of innocent people as a means of bolstering U.S. security. It doesn’t work and makes all humanity, and the future of complex life, less secure.”

    84 Year Old Nun Gets Prison in Nuclear Weapons Break-In,” Fayetteville Observer, February 18, 2014.

    Russia Tests Nuclear Missile Amidst Ukraine Crisis

     

    The Russian military reportedly test fired a Topol RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) on March 4, as the crisis in Ukraine continues to grow. The Topol RS-12M missile is a delivery vehicle for Russia’s nuclear warheads. The U.S. said that it was notified of the ICBM test beforehand, as required by arms control treaties.

    This provocative test is reminiscent of a U.S. test of a Minuteman III ICBM at the height of the U.S.-North Korea crisis in 2013.

    Russia Reports Ballistic Missile Test Amid Crimea Tension,” BBC News, March 4, 2014.

    Nuclear Waste

    U.S. Nuclear Waste Workers Receive Internal Radiation Dose in Leak

     

    The U.S. Department of Energy reported that 13 workers in New Mexico were exposed to radiation from a leak at the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP), the only deep underground nuclear waste dump facility in the U.S. WIPP is the only facility in the U.S. that can store plutonium-contaminated clothing and tools from nuclear building and testing sites. After the leak occurred on February 14, employees were checked for external contamination and had biological samples taken to check for possible exposure from inhaling radioactive participles. The 13 workers who tested positive have been notified and will undergo additional testing to determine the magnitude of the exposure.

    This is the first reported release of radiation from the plant in the 15 years that it has been storing plutonium-contaminated waste from nuclear bomb building sites. From the analysis of air samples around the plant, officials are able to tell that a container of waste leaked, but haven’t been able to get underground to find out what caused it. While elevated radiation levels have been detected around the plant, officials report the readings are too low to constitute a public health threat.

    Jeri Clausing, “13 Workers Exposed to Radiation at New Mexico Nuclear Dump,” Associated Press, February 26, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of March, including the Castle Bravo nuclear test (March 1, 1954) and President Reagan’s announcement of his “Star Wars” plan (March 23, 1983).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Nuremberg Prosecutor on Creating a Humane, Peaceful World

     

    Ben Ferencz, the only living prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials, has issued a 3-minute video statement about how he thinks we can go about creating a humane and peaceful world under international law.

    To watch the video, click here.

    A Ban on Nuclear Weapons: What’s in it for NATO?

     

    The International Law and Policy Institute has published a new paper entitled “A Ban on Nuclear Weapons: What’s in it for NATO?”

    The proposal that nuclear weapons should be banned through the early adoption of a legally binding instrument is gaining traction. A topic of increasingly serious discussion, it is making its way up the international agenda – from being an idea with no real prospect of successful adoption, to a proposal to be reckoned with. Arguing that a process to ban nuclear weapons could become a political reality in the foreseeable future, this paper considers the implications of such an instrument for NATO member states. The paper finds that as a matter of international law, there is no barrier to member states’ adherence to such a treaty. Likewise, concerns about the political implications for NATO ignore historical variations in member state military policy and underestimate the value of a ban on nuclear weapons for promoting NATO’s ultimate aim: the security of its member states.

    To read the full paper, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Help Us Expose the Truth About Nuclear Weapons

     

    73% of Americans think that nukes are nuts. Isn’t it time to wage all-out peace?

    Help NAPF launch a movement that exposes the truth about nuclear weapons. Click here for more information.

    Native Ideals to Spark a New Peaceful Revolution

     

    NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul Chappell spoke on the principles of nonviolence at the second workshop on Building Nonviolent Indigenous Rights Movements on February 15, 2014 in Nova Scotia, Canada. Held at the Tatamagouche Retreat Center outside Halifax, and sponsored by the Wabanaki Confederacy and the Land Peace Foundation, this workshop also included special interactions from the Native community.

    “The inclusion of more traditional and ceremonial elements into the Nova Scotia workshop, such as talking circles that were facilitated by prayer and ceremony, enabled us to deepen our dialogue with participants. By including more traditional elements, we were able to connect with each other in a more meaningful way,” said co-trainer Sherri Mitchell, Indigenous lawyer and Executive Director of the Land Peace Foundation.

    To read more about the training in Nova Scotia, click here.

    To learn more about the Peace Leadership Program, including our 2014 Peace Leadership Summer Course, click here.

    Noam Chomsky Delivers NAPF Lecture

     

    Professor Noam Chomsky delivered the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 13th Annual Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity’s Future on February 28 in Santa Barbara, California. Speaking to a sold-out theater of over 600 people, Professor Chomsky discussed “Security and State Policy.” He ended his lecture stating that continuing with a world that contains nuclear weapons amounts to collective suicide; we must not allow this situation to go on any longer.

    A transcript of Prof. Chomsky’s speech is available now on the NAPF website. Photos, video and the audio podcast will be posted on wagingpeace.org as soon as they are available.

    Nukes Are Nuts Video Contest – Deadline April 1

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s annual Swackhamer Disarmament Video Contest is now underway. The theme of this year’s contest is “Nukes Are Nuts.” Contestants will make videos of 30 seconds or less describing why they think nuclear weapons are crazy and must be eliminated.

    We have already received some excellent entries, which can be viewed on the contest’s Facebook page.

    For more information about the contest, including a full list of rules and instructions on how to enter, click here. The deadline for entries is April 1.

    Quotes

     

    “Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.”

    Article VI of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which entered into force on March 5, 1970. Emphasis is ours.

     

    “Sunflowers instead of missiles in the soil would ensure peace for future generations.”

    — U.S. Defense Secretary William Perry, speaking at a ceremony in Ukraine in 1996 marking their new status as a nuclear weapon-free nation. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, edited by NAPF President David Krieger.

    Editorial Team

     

    Neil Fasching

    David Krieger

    Rose Mertens

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman