Author: NAPF Press Office

  • Open Letter on Nuclear Dangers

    The recently signed arms control treaty between the United States and
    Russia brings welcome reductions in deployed nuclear warheads and an
    agreed ceiling on the number of delivery vehicles that each side may
    possess. We applaud the new agreement and the acts of political
    leadership required in both countries to bring it about. The
    breakthrough is all the more welcome, coming just weeks before both the
    Washington Summit on Nuclear Security and the Review Conference of the
    Non-Proliferation Treaty. Across Europe, and at this moment of
    diplomatic opportunity, we have joined together to declare our
    unequivocal support for President Obama’s vision of a world without
    nuclear weapons, to declare our desire to re-set the security
    relationship between Europe, the US and Russia, and to show strong
    European support for the measures necessary to deliver these goals.

    Let no-one doubt the importance of this endeavour. The risks of
    proliferation are growing. India, Israel and Pakistan have already
    entered the nuclear club. If Iran gets the bomb, others certainly will
    follow.  We know that terrorist groups want to acquire nuclear
    materials, making the security of those materials an issue of truly
    global significance. Nuclear armed states inside the NPT have not been
    disarming fast enough, straining the confidence of their non-nuclear
    partners in the credibility of the NPT grand bargain. Without further
    action, there is a real danger that the world will be overwhelmed by
    proliferation risks and incidents of nuclear weapons use, with all their
    catastrophic consequences.

    The strategic implications of this are profound. Nuclear deterrence
    is a far less persuasive strategic response to a world of potential
    regional nuclear arms races and nuclear terrorism than it was to the
    Cold War.

    The circumstances of today require a shift in thinking. We must,
    through further multilateral agreement, reduce the role and the number
    of nuclear weapons in the world, deepen confidence in the
    non-proliferation regime, and improve the security of existing nuclear
    weapons and materials. We must achieve these goals while at the same
    time helping those countries that wish to go down the civil nuclear
    energy route do so safely.

    The practical steps necessary to achieve our goals are clear. In
    Washington, we must demonstrate wider international ownership of the
    issue of nuclear security. This is not just a concern for those fearing a
    nuclear terrorist attack. Any major nuclear security incident anywhere
    is likely to derail the civil nuclear renaissance everywhere. Regardless
    of whether we as individuals support the idea of more nuclear power,
    this may ultimately undermine global attempts to meet the challenge of
    climate change, an outcome we all have a stake in avoiding.

    The Washington Summit also must agree practical action on programmes
    to control and destroy nuclear materials and ready-made weapons within
    four years; and participants must agree to rationalise the many complex
    overlapping international conventions, initiatives and resolutions that
    are the current institutional architecture aimed at addressing this
    issue.

    In May, at the NPT Review Conference in New York, the Treaty, for 40
    years the foundation of counter-proliferation efforts, must be
    overhauled and reinforced. All signatory nations should accept the
    strengthened monitoring provisions of the Additional Protocol. The IAEA
    needs that strengthened inspection power if it is to provide effective
    monitoring of declared and undeclared nuclear material and activities.
    Nations wishing to develop a civil nuclear capability must first agree
    to proper verification procedures and unimpeded access for the IAEA.

    Progress of this nature will not be possible without a credible
    process for nuclear disarmament. Beyond START follow-on we need urgent
    and more radical initiatives from the nuclear weapons states.
    Increasingly it is becoming more challenging to explain why some
    countries should have, and others should not be allowed to possess
    nuclear weapons.

    All nuclear weapons, including tactical ones, must be included in
    disarmament talks. Where this necessitates discussion of conventional
    force imbalances, these too must be included. States that now possess
    nuclear weapons must work together to reduce their importance to
    national and international security.

    The establishment of nuclear free zones in Latin America, sub-Saharan
    Africa and Central Asia is very encouraging. By the end of the NPT
    Review Conference there must be a credible process for the discussion of
    a Weapons of Mass Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East.

    After May, attention must also return to other issues. The countries
    that have not yet ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty including
    the US, China, Israel, Pakistan, India and North Korea should do so
    urgently, allowing it to come into force. The stalemate in the Geneva
    Disarmament Conference on a Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty must also be
    overcome. We need a treaty-sanctioned prohibition of the production of
    the basic materials required to manufacture nuclear explosive devices.

    Europe, through NATO, is central to the security relationship with
    Russia and can influence it through NATO diplomacy and the ongoing
    revision of NATO’s Strategic Concept. The UK and France, working with
    other nuclear weapons states, can play their full part in discussions on
    disarmament, and in efforts to implement any internationally agreed and
    verifiable reductions in warhead numbers. In addition to that
    leadership Europe is a key player in civil nuclear power and nuclear
    security.

    In short, Europe can and must play a vital role in building the
    cooperation necessary for meeting the global nuclear challenge. All our
    futures depend on it.

    Signed:

    1. Kåre Willoch, Former Prime Minister of Norway
    2. Kjell Magne Bondevik, Former Prime Minister of Norway
    3. Oddvar Nordli, Former Prime Minister of Norway
    4. Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, Former Prime Minister of Norway
    5. Thorvald Stoltenberg, Former Minister of Defense and Minister of
      Foreign Affairs of Norway
    6. Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Former Prime Minister and Foreign Minister
      of Poland
    7. Ruud Lubbers, Former Prime Minister of the Netherlands (author of
      “Moving beyond the stalemate”)
    8. Jean-Luc Dehaene, Former Prime Minister of Belgium and current MEP
    9. Guy Verhofstadt, Former Prime Minister of Belgium and current MEP,
    10. Lord Geoffrey Howe of Aberavon, Former British Deputy Prime
      Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer and Foreign Secretary
    11. Laurens Jan Brinkhorst, Former Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of
      Economic Affairs of the Netherlands
    12. Jan Kavan, Former Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of the
      Czech Republic
    13. Volker Rühe, Former Defence Minister of Germany
    14. Elisabeth Rehn, Former Defence Minister of Finland, Former UN
      Under-Secretary-General, SRSG
    15. Hans Blix, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden
    16. Wolfgang Ischinger, Former Deputy Foreign Minister of Germany
    17. General Bernard Norlain, Former French General, Former commander of
      the French Tactical Air Force and military counselor to the Prime
      Minister
    18. Lord George Robertson of Port Ellen, Former British Defence
      Secretary and Secretary General of NATO
    19. Sir Malcolm Rifkind, Former British Defence Secretary and Foreign
      Secretary
    20. Admiral the Lord Michael Boyce, Former British Chief of the Defence
      Staff
    21. Lord Charles Guthrie of Craigiebank Former British Chief of the
      Defence Staff
    22. Lord Douglas Hurd of Westwell Former British Foreign Secretary
    23. Margaret Beckett, Former British Foreign Secretary
    24. Des Browne, Former British Defence Secretary
    25. Lord Tom King of Bridgwater Former British Defence Secretary
    26. Louis Michel MEP Former, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Belgium
    27. Mogens Lykketoft MP, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark
    28. Niels Helveg Petersen MP, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of
      Denmark
    29. Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark
    30. Frits Korthals Altes, Former President of the Senate and Minister of
      Justice of the Netherlands
    31. Michael Ancram, Former British Shadow Foreign Secretary and Shadow
      Defence Secretary
    32. Dr. John Reid, Former British Defence Secretary
    33. Sir Menzies Campbell, Former British Leader Liberal Democrat Party
      and Liberal Democrat Shadow Foreign Secretary
    34. Shirley Williams (Baroness Williams of Crosby) Former Adviser on
      Nuclear Proliferation to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown
    35. Charles Clarke, Former British Home Secretary
    36. James Arbuthnot, Former British Chair of the Defence Select
      Committee
    37. Adam Ingram, Former British Defence Minister of State (Armed Forces)
    38. Prof. Ivo Šlaus, Former Croatian MP, former member of Foreign
      Affairs Committee and current Emeritus Professor of Physics
    39. Francesco Calogero, Italian theoretical physicist & former
      Secretary General of Pugwash
    40. Giorgio La Malfa MP, Former Italian Minister of European Affairs
    41. Federica On. Mogherini Rebesani, Member of the Italian Parliament
  • Wallace Drew, A Man Of Peace, (1917 – 2003)

    Wallace Drew, chair emeritus of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, died peacefully on September 7, 2003 at the age of 85. Wally was one of the Foundation’s founders and served as its first treasurer and later as the first chair of the Board. A disabling stroke in 1998 slowed Wally down considerably, but he fought back courageously and remained involved in the work of the Foundation until his death.

    During World War II, Wally served as a major in the Army Corps of Engineers. He landed at Normandy and fought in seven major battles across France. He was part of the US forces that liberated Paris and one of the first Americans to enter the Buchenwald concentration camp. Wally received a Bronze Star and seven battle stars. After the conclusion of the war in Europe, Wally was assigned to be part of the planning group for the invasion of Japan.

    His experiences in war as a young man strengthened Wally’s commitment to building a peaceful world. In a 1997 interview, Wally reflected upon these experiences, “I was one of four boys. One brother was killed in action, another was wounded. I wanted to do everything possible to prevent future wars.”

    Wally’s commitment to preventing future wars led him to join with David Krieger, Frank Kelly and Charles Jamison in the creation of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation in 1982. Wally served on the Foundation’s Board of Directors for the next 21 years.

    Wally was a humble man who did not seek recognition for himself, but for his efforts he received many awards. These included a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Santa Barbara News Press, a Community Service Award from the Anti-Defamation League, and a Community Hero Award from Sansum Clinic. Wally believed in giving back to his community and to the world, and he did so in many admirable ways.

    Foundation President David Krieger said of Wally in his Eulogy: “In a world filled with suffering, Wally lived compassionately. In a world awash in apathy and complacency, Wally lived with commitment. And in a world too often marked by the cowardice of inaction, Wally consistently acted with courage.”

    We will miss Wally’s determination and good humor, along with his compassion, commitment and courage, but we will carry forward his spirit in the work of the Foundation.

    In honor of Wally, the Foundation is establishing the Wallace T. Drew Internship for Peace and Disarmament. This internship will support the work of a summer intern to work on issues of peace and disarmament each year at the Foundation.