Author: Mike Ryan

  • 2014 Evening for Peace to Honor Medea Benjamin

    Please join us as we honor Medea Benjamin at the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 31st Annual Evening for Peace on November 16, 2014, in Santa Barbara, California. Medea Benjamin is co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    For more information on the Evening for Peace, click here. To purchase tickets securely online, click here. If you prefer, you can also call the NAPF office at 805-965-3443.

  • Open Letter in Support of the Marshall Islands’ Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Dear President Christopher Loeak,

    Dear Foreign Minister Tony de Brum,

    Dear People and Parliament of the Marshall Islands,

    The world salutes your initiative in taking legal action for negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under Article VI of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and customary international law against the nine nuclear-armed “Goliaths” (the United States, Russia, UK, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea).

    We hope that you will be joined in these lawsuits by as many governments as possible, and we will urge them to do so.

    In taking this action, you, and any governments that choose to join you, are acting on behalf of all the seven billion people who now live on Earth and on behalf of the generations yet unborn who could never be born if nuclear weapons are ever used in large numbers.

    You are also acting on behalf of all our ancestors throughout tens of millennia who will have their intellectual, cultural and scientific achievements cancelled should humanity terminate itself through the inadvertent or deliberate use of nuclear weapons.

    In addition, you are acting on behalf of untold thousands of other species who will surely perish in the catastrophic global climatic effects of a nuclear conflict.

    Win or lose in the coming legal arguments, what you, and any who join you, will do has the deepest moral significance, going far beyond the specific interests of any country or government and beyond the usual calculations of national self-interest.

    The unprecedented outburst of resounding applause that Foreign Minister Tony de Brum received in the plenary of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Preparatory Committee meeting on 28 April 2014 shows that, for the world, you are all heroes.

    If you stay the course, alone or with a host of others, then what you will be doing is – to recycle a phrase already well-used – “not so much making history, as making history possible.”

    All people and all governments that have the welfare and survival of humanity and the planet at heart must support you wholeheartedly in your courageous legal action.

    (For further information see www.nuclearzero.org)

    Signed:

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace Laureate, South Africa

    Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Laureate, Northern Ireland

    Oscar Arias, Nobel Peace Laureate, Costa Rica

    Jody Williams, Nobel Peace Laureate, United States

    Shirin Ebadi, Nobel Peace Laureate, Iran

    Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Nobel Peace Laureate, Argentina

    John Hallam (Letter coordinator), People for Nuclear Disarmament/Human Survival Project, Australia

    Prof. Peter King, Human Survival Project, Australia

    David Krieger, President, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, United States

    Kumi Naidoo, Executive Director, Greenpeace International, Netherlands

    Aaron Tovish, Mayors For Peace 2020 Vision Campaign, Austria

    Colin Archer, Secretary-General, International Peace Bureau, Switzerland

    Ingeborg Brienes, Co-President, International Peace Bureau, Switzerland

    Jayantha Dhanapala, former UN Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs (Personal Capacity)

    Helen Caldicott, M.D., Founder, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Australia

    Jonathan Granoff, President, Global Security Institute, United States

    Senator Scott Ludlam, Australia

    Jill Hall MP, Australia

    Judy Blyth, People for Nuclear Disarmament, Australia

    Jenny Grounds, President, Medical Association for the Prevention of War, Australia

    Chris Hamer, World Citizens Association / Scientists for Global Responsibility, Australia

    Nick Deane, Marrickville Peace Group, Australia

    Father Claude Mostowyk, MSC, Missionaries of the Sacred Hearth Justice and Peace Centre, Australia

    Ruth Russell, Convenor, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, Australia

    Dennis Doherty, Australian Anti-Bases Campaign Coalition, Australia

    Hanna Middleton, Australian Anti-Bases Campaign Coalition, Australia

    Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, Sydney University, Australia

    Barney Richards, President, New Zealand Peace Council, New Zealand

    Bob Rigg, former Chair, National Consultative Committee on Peace and Disarmament, New Zealand

    John Hinchcliffe, President, NZ Peace Foundation, New Zealand

    Dr. Kate Dewes,Disarmament and Security Centre, New Zealand

    Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.), Disarmament and Security Centre, New Zealand

    Dave Webb, Chair, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, United Kingdom

    Bill Kidd MSP, United Kingdom

    Jenny Maxwell, Hereford Peace Council, United Kingdom

    Rae Street, Greater Manchester Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, United Kingdom

    Godrick Ernest Scott Bader, Life-President, Scott Bader Ltd, United Kingdom

    Arthur West, Chair, Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, United Kingdom

    Tony Simpson, Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, United Kingdom

    Prof. Emeritus Kirsten Osen, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Norway

    Prof. John Gunnar Maeland, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Norway

    John Scales Avery, Ph.D., Chairman, Danish National Group, Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, Denmark

    Ingrid Schittich, Chairperson, Association of World Citizens, Germany

    Xanthe Hall, Disarmament Campaigner, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Germany

    Herman Spanjaard, M.D., Chair, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Netherlands

    Dr. Peter van den Dungen, General Coordinator, International Network of Museums for Peace, Netherlands

    Dominique Lalanne, Co-chair, Armes nucléaires STOP, France

    Jean-Marie Matagne, President, Action des Citoyens pour le desarmement nucleaire, France

    Pep Puig, Ph.D., Group of Scientists and Technicians for a Non-Nuclear Future, Spain

    Josep Puig, President, Eurosolar, Spain

    Santiago Vilanova, Journalist, Green Alternative, Spain

    Maria Arvaniti Sotiropoulou, President, Greek Medical Association for the Protection of the Environment and against Nuclear and Biochemical Threat, Greece

    Dr. Mubashir Hasan, President Punjab, Pakistan People’s Party, Pakistan

    Sharon Dolev, Director, Israeli Disarmament Movement, Israel

    Sukla Sen, EKTA, India

    J. Narayana Rao, Secretary, Centre For Cultural, Educational, Economics and Social Studies, India

    Wilfred D’Costa, Indian Social Action Forum, India

    Dr. Ranjith S. Jayasekhara, Vice-President, Sri Lankan Doctors for Peace and Development, Sri Lanka

    Ronald McCoy, Malaysian Physicians for Social Responsibility, Malaysia

    Dr. Syed Husain Ali, Senator, Malaysia

    Hiro Umebayashi, Special Adviser, Peace Depot, Japan

    Hiroshi Taka, Representative Director, Japan Council against A & H Bombs (Gensuikyo), Japan

    Steve Leeper, Research Centre for Nuclear Weapons Abolition, Nagasaki University, Japan

    Hideyuki Ban, Citizens Nuclear Information Centre, Japan

    Tadatoshi Akiba, Former Mayor of Hiroshima, Japan

    Joan Russow, Global Compliance Research Project, Canada

    Gordon Edwards Ph.D., President, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, Canada

    Martha Goodings, No2 Nuclear Weapons, Canada

    Vivian Davidson, President, World Federalist Movement – Vancouver Branch, Canada

    Patti Willis, Pacific Peace Working Group, Canada

    Phyllis Creighton, Veterans Against Nuclear Arms, Canada

    Larry Kazdan, CGA, Vancouver, Canada

    Saul Arbess, Director, Canadian Peace Initiative, Canada

    Global Alliance of Ministries for Peace

    Marylia Kelley, Executive Director, Tri-Valley CAREs (Communities Against a Radioactive Environment), United States

    Kathy Wanpovi Sanchez, Tewa Women United, United States

    Alfred L. Marder, President, US Peace Council, United States

    Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action, United States

    Stephen Vincent Kobasa, Coordinator, Trident Resistance Network, United States

    Lawrence Wittner, Professor Emeritus of History, SUNY/Albany, United States

    Ralph Hutchison, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, United States

    Blase Bonpane, Co-Director, Office of the Americas, United States

    Theresa Bonpane, Co-Director, Office of the Americas, United States

    Prof. Martin Hellman, Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, United States

    Alice Slater, New York Director, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

    Dr. Ruby Anne Chirino, Program Coordinator, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Mexico

  • 50 years after receiving Nobel Prize, do Martin Luther King’s peace prophecies still resonate?

    This article was originally published by the Associated Press.

    The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. dedicated his life to much more than achieving racial equality. That goal, he said again and again, was inseparable from alleviating poverty and stopping war. And he reiterated this theme after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize 50 years ago this week.

    “I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war, that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality,” he said in his Nobel acceptance speech.

    “Sooner or later, all the people of the world will have to discover a way to live together in peace.”

    Half a century later, it’s obvious that enormous progress has been made toward overcoming racial discrimination — that King was right in his vision about race. Yet widespread poverty remains, in America and beyond, and bombs still fall as brutal wars rage on.

    Was King naive? Was his full vision simply unobtainable — do free markets require poor people to function, and will war always assert itself as a defining human habit?

    Is King’s Nobel vision relevant five decades later?

    Absolutely, insist some who study King’s life and philosophy. They say his racial proclamations and strategies, so controversial back then but now part of the American cultural canon, can and should apply to today’s stubborn issues of poverty and war.

    “I don’t think his vision has ever been more relevant,” says Paul Chappell, a West Point graduate who served in Iraq and now teaches and writes books about peace. “The problem is, people don’t realize how prophetic King was.”

    Chappell, the Peace Leadership Director for the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, which seeks a world without nuclear weapons, says a close examination of King’s life and work shows he predicted today’s protests over income inequality and trillions of war dollars drained from America’s budgets.

    “He realized that American military intervention is not only harmful to people around the world, it’s also harmful to the American people,” Chappell says.

    The peace prize for King, then just 35 years old, honored a Southern preacher whose philosophy, courage and oratory galvanized the civil rights movement, on whose behalf he said he accepted it. It gave a unique international recognition to the movement’s accomplishments at a pivotal time.

    The prize was announced on October 14, 1964, against a backdrop of the Civil Rights Act, whose passage earlier that year finally granted black Americans full citizenship. But it also came as the nation approached all-out war in Vietnam. King accepted the award in Oslo, Norway, on December 10, and the following day delivered the traditional Nobel lecture.

    In his remarks, King returned to a lifelong theme of describing a world where love and compassion could conquer poverty and conflict. His strategies were based on nonviolence — “the need for man to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to violence and oppression,” as he said in his speech.

    “The foundation of such a method is love,” he said.

    “The Nobel speeches really are neglected gems of how long-term progress against these evils requires a great commitment of mind and spirit and cooperation all rolled into one,” says the historian Taylor Branch, author of the definitive trilogy “America in the King Years.”

    “I don’t think he’s naïve,” Branch says. “I think he’s saying, if there’s hope, it’s through nonviolent cooperation and really applying it with courage and all your heart and your mind against the evils that still plague the world.”

    Branch says that even though dozens of countries are at war today, levels of global violence and large-scale casualties have been declining since the mid-20th century. By that measure, there has been progress toward King’s dream of peace.

    King used his Nobel lecture to expand on the connections between racism, poverty and war.

    “Each of these problems, while appearing to be separate and isolated, is inextricably bound to the other,” he said.

    Using nonviolence to achieve racial progress, King said, meant people “have taken suffering upon themselves instead of inflicting it on others . It has meant that we do not want to instill fear in others or into the society of which we are a part.”

    That society is far bigger than America, King stated. It is the human family.

    “We have inherited a big house, a great ‘world house’ in which in which we have to live together — black and white, Easterners and Westerners, Gentiles and Jews, Catholics and Protestants, Moslem and Hindu, a family unduly separated in ideas, culture, and interests who, because we can never again live without each other, must learn, somehow, in this one big world, to live with each other,” King lectured.

    “This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class, and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all men.”

    Some say love has nothing to do with it. “War is embedded in our very nature,” the influential scholar Edward O. Wilson wrote in his book “The Social Conquest of Earth,” which argues that humans have developed, biologically, a tendency to fight. Others argue that some income inequality is inevitable, since people have different capabilities.

    Yet there is the question of degree. Clayborne Carson, a history professor and director of Stanford University’s Martin Luther King Jr. Research and Education Institute, says King had focused on the triple threat of racism, poverty and war since the earliest parts of his career.

    “You couldn’t solve one without solving the others,” Carson says in describing King’s view.

    In that context, today’s struggle against enduring poverty and war may reflect a resistance to King’s holistic approach: We followed King’s lead to push back racism, but haven’t yet tried to apply his methods of love and shared suffering to poverty and war.

    “If the distribution of wealth in America was less unequal, we wouldn’t see as many of these manifestations of racial conflict,” Carson says.

    The gap between the richest and poorest Americans has grown over the last 40 years, according to a February 2014 report by the liberal Economic Policy Institute. And the poverty rate, 15 percent in 2012, the most recent year available, hasn’t improved much since 1964, when it stood at 19 percent.

    King said in Oslo: “It is obvious that if man is to redeem his spiritual and moral ‘lag,’ he must go all out to bridge the social and economic gulf between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’ of the world. Poverty is one of the most urgent items on the agenda of modern life.”

    Carson provided another example of King’s strategies being ignored: the idea that “if we just fight against these terrorists, terrorism will go away. One of the things King said is that the United States is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. We don’t see that in ourselves, we (think we) use violence for good.”

    Chappell, the soldier turned peacemaker, said King was ahead of his time in calling for solving international problems without war, because there are often no military solutions available today.

    “In purely military terms, look at Russia. There is no military option for us, because they have nuclear weapons,” Chappell said. “With ISIS, you have people from Britain and Turkey and probably the United States who want to join ISIS. It’s an ideology. How do you deal with this problem in a conventional military way?” ISIS is another name for the terrorist group calling itself the Islamic State.

    Observed King in his lecture: “Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem; it merely creates new and more complicated ones.”

    “Violence ends up defeating itself,” he said.

    These were King’s thoughts 50 years ago as he sought to heal a nation fraught with centuries-old racial barriers and to safeguard a world with growing stockpiles of nuclear weapons.

    Today, as society continues to realize King’s racial dreams, perhaps there is still prophecy to be fulfilled in his Nobel talks.

    “Is it possible that the road he and his people have charted may bring a ray of hope to other parts of the world, a hope that conflicts between races, nations, and political systems can be solved, not by fire and sword, but in a spirit of true brotherly love?” Gunnar John, chairman of the Nobel committee, asked when giving King the peace prize.

    “It sounds like a dream of a remote and unknown future,” he said, “but life is not worth living without a dream and without working to make the dream reality.”

  • Sunflower Newsletter: October 2014

    Issue #207 – October 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • U.S. Nuclear Policy: Taking the Wrong Road by David Krieger
      • Making the Connection: The People’s Climate March and the International Day of Peace by Bob Dodge
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises
      • Tony de Brum Speaks About Lawsuits
      • Hearing on U.S. Motion to Dismiss Scheduled for October 10
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. Plans Massive Nuclear Weapons Modernization Program
      • New Mexico Nuclear Dump in Extended Shutdown
    • Nuclear Arms Race
      • Russia Tests Nuclear Missile
      • U.S. Tests Nuclear Missile
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Security Without Nuclear Deterrence
      • Tri-Valley CAREs Video Contest
      • ICAN Civil Society Forum
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF at Peace and Justice Studies Association Conference
      • Poetry Contest Winners
      • Rendez-Vous Ottawa
      • Evening for Peace
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    U.S. Nuclear Policy: Taking the Wrong Road

    On September 21, 2014, the International Day of Peace, The New York Times published an article by William Broad and David Sanger, “U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms.”  The authors reported that a recent federal study put the price tag for modernizing the U.S. nuclear arsenal at “up to a trillion dollars” over the next three decades.

    All this emphasis on modernizing the nuclear deterrent force may be good for business, but ignores two important facts.  First, nuclear deterrence is only a hypothesis about human behavior that has not been and cannot be proven to work.  Second, it ignores the obligations of the U.S. and other nuclear-armed states to pursue negotiations in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and for nuclear disarmament.

    To read more, click here.

    Making the Connection: The People’s Climate March and the International Day of Peace

    Climate change and world peace will each be highlighted on September 21, the International Day of Peace. In our nuclear armed, temperature rising, resource depleting world these issues are intricately related and represent the greatest threats to our planet. It is not coincidence that they be highlighted together. We must make the connection between peace on the planet and peace with the environment. Sunday’s Peoples Climate March will empower citizens the world over to demonstrate the will of the people and demand action as global leaders convene in New York on Tuesday for the U.N. Climate Summit.

    As our planet warms, causing severe droughts and weather conditions, crop losses at home and around the world, conflict ensues as competition for finite resources develops.  Entire populations and countries are at risk with rising sea levels. Climate change is a catalyst for conflict.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises

     

    Leslie Thatcher, editor of Truthout, interviewed NAPF President David Krieger about the Marshall Islands’ Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

    The interview focuses on the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the breaches of the NPT that are the basis for the lawsuits, the history of U.S. nuclear weapon testing in the Marshall Islands, and what individuals can do to support the courageous action of the Marshall Islands.

    Leslie Thatcher, “Small Island Country Attempts to Hold Hegemon to Its Promises,” Truthout, September 11, 2014.

    Tony de Brum Speaks About Lawsuits

    In an interview at the People’s Climate March in New York City, Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony de Brum explained why the Marshall Islands (RMI) is suing the nine nuclear-armed nations. According to de Brum, the lawsuits seek a “nuclear-free world,” one which RMI has a “moral and legal mandate” to pursue. “It is incumbent on us,” says de Brum, “to make a statement to the world and remind our development partners…to own up to their promises to reduce nuclear weapons.”

    To watch the video, click the link below.

    Why We’re Suing Nuclear Nations – Interview with Tony de Brum,” YouTube / Ecological Options Network, October 1, 2014.

    Hearing on U.S. Motion to Dismiss Scheduled for October 10

    The first court hearing around the Nuclear Zero lawsuit filed by the Marshall Islands against the United States in U.S. Federal District Court is scheduled to take place on October 10 in Oakland, California. The hearing will address the Motion to Dismiss, filed by the United States in July 2014.

    For those interested in reading the background documents in this case, they are:

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. Plans Massive Nuclear Weapons Modernization Program

     

    Since a deal was struck with Senate Republicans in 2010, the Obama administration has been ramping up the modernization of U.S. nuclear weapons programs, despite campaign promises to the contrary. The cost is projected to be up to $355 billion over the next decade. Many proposals have come up against obstacles, such as the discovery of a fault line underneath the proposed plutonium facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico.

    Beyond the refurbishing of nuclear weapon facilities, the Obama administration is also planning to build 12 new missile submarines, 100 new bombers, and 400 land-based missiles, all with nuclear capabilities. These proposed additions to the United States’ arsenal have been projected to cost up to $1.1 trillion dollars to complete. The size and scope of these nuclear projects have concerned officials inside and outside of the administration. Despite all of this, the Obama administration insists that its current course does not conflict with longstanding international legal obligations to negotiate and achieve total nuclear disarmament.

    William J. Broad and David E. Sanger, “U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms,” The New York Times, September 21, 2014.

    New Mexico Nuclear Waste Dump in Extended Shutdown

     

    The Department of Energy has announced that a nuclear waste facility in Carlsbad, New Mexico will remain closed until 2016. Known as the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, the facility stores nuclear waste 2,000 feet underground in storage drums. In early February, a truck caught on fire in the underground component of the facility, causing workers to suffer from smoke inhalation.  Several days later, a faulty storage drum ruptured, spreading radiation throughout the facility. At least 22 workers were exposed to radiation. The site has been closed ever since, and the estimated costs before reopening are estimated to total over $500 million.

    John R. Emshwiller, “New Mexico Nuclear Waste Dump Expected to Remain Closed Until 2016,” The Wall Street Journal, September 30, 2014.

    Nuclear Arms Race

    Russia Tests Nuclear Missile

     

    Russia successfully tested a new intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting targets up to 5,000 miles away. This test was one of many conducted on the Bulava missile, and follows the trend of increased military activity since the beginning of the crisis in Ukraine. The missile is capable of carrying 6-10 nuclear warheads of up to 100 times the explosive yield of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, Japan.

    The 39-foot, 40-ton missile was successfully launched from a submarine in the White Sea to a target in Russia’s far east. Admiral Chirkov, Naval Commander-in-Chief, has stated that two more launches will be carried out in October and November of this year.

    Russia Successfully Tests Nuclear Missile, More Planned: Naval Chief,” Reuters, September 10, 2014.

    U.S. Tests Nuclear Missile

     

    On September 23, the U.S. Air Force conducted a test launch of a Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. The missile was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California to Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. It came two days after the International Day of Peace (Sept. 21) and three days before the official UN Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (Sept. 26). Clearly this timing was meant to send a message, and it is not a message of peace.

    Though the Air Force Global Strike Command contends that the ICBM test launch program is to validate and verify the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of the weapon system, this test is yet another example of the continuation of decades of psychological and physical terror the U.S. has imposed upon the people of the Marshall Islands.

    David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and a consultant to the Marshall Islands on the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, commented, “The officials at Vandenberg say the purpose of the test is to ‘validate and verify the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of the weapons system.’ This means the effectiveness, readiness and accuracy of a weapons system capable of destroying civilization. The Air Force is only doing its job: practicing for the destruction of the human species. Instead of launching missiles we should be leading negotiations to rid the world of weapons of mass annihilation.”

    U.S. Nuclear Missile Test: Timing Is Everything,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, September 22, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of October, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and nuclear tests by many different countries.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Security Without Nuclear Deterrence

     

    Commander Robert Green, Royal Navy (Ret.), has published an updated e-book version of his book Security Without Nuclear Deterrence.

    The nuclear-armed nations and their allies cite nuclear deterrence as the primary justification for maintaining nuclear weapons. Its fallacies must therefore be exposed and alternatives offered if they are to be eliminated.

    As a former operator of British nuclear weapons, Commander Green chronicles the history, practical difficulties and dangerous contradictions of nuclear deterrence. He offers instead more credible, effective and responsible alternative strategies to deter aggression and achieve real security.

    Click here for more information on the e-book, available through Amazon.com.

    Tri-Valley CAREs Video Contest

     

    Tri-Valley CAREs, a nonprofit organization based in Livermore, California, is holding a video contest entitled “Six Decades of Nuclear Bombs: Tell Us Why a Clean Environment Is Important to You.”

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is one of the United States’ two nuclear weapons design and research laboratories. Every nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal was designed at either Livermore or Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico.

    Operating this lab in Livermore, California for six decades has taken a serious toll on the local environment. In fact, the Lab has released over 1 million curies of radiation into the local environment (approximately the same amount that was deposited on the people of Hiroshima from the atomic bomb in 1945).

    Tri-Valley CAREs invites you to create a video in 2 minutes or less about the impacts of nuclear weapons on the environment in Livermore. Three cash prizes are available for the top videos.

    For more information, click here.

    ICAN Civil Society Forum

     

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) has announced a Civil Society Forum to take place in Vienna, Austria on December 6-7. The forum will take place in advance of a government conference on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, also in Vienna.

    Representatives of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, along with many other campaigners, activists, experts, public figures and survivors, will gather to learn and to teach, to energize and be energized, to demonstrate our unity and to demand the end of the era of nuclear weapons. Over a packed but fun-filled two days, we will engage in discussions with the best and brightest voices in the humanitarian disarmament field, hear testimonies from inspirational individuals who know the meaning of courage, develop our campaigning and advocacy skills and, of course, get up to speed on the ins and outs of the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons.

    To learn more about the Civil Society Forum and to register, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF at Peace and Justice Studies Association Conference

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be well represented at the upcoming conference of the Peace and Justice Studies Association. NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell will deliver a keynote address on the first day of the conference. NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman and social media consultant Shai Ford will present a workshop on the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits.

    This year’s conference will take place at the University of San Diego on October 17-18. For more information, click here.

    Poetry Contest Winners

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has announced the winners of its annual Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards. The contest has three categories: Adult (over 18); Youth (ages 13-18); and Youth (12 and under).

    The contest encourages poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. To read this year’s winning poems, click here. For more information on the 2015 poetry contest, click here.

    Rendez-Vous Ottawa

     

    Rendez-vous Ottawa will take place on October 25-26 at the University of Ottawa. The conference will introduce the global conversation about the humanitarian impacts of nuclear weapons to a North American audience and give participants the tools needed to spread the word and join the work towards a ban on nuclear weapons. Topics include the impact of nuclear weapons, our ability to respond to a nuclear detonation, legal and political roads to disarmament, the humanitarian approach to disarmament, campaigning skills and more.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will be a speaker at the event. For more information, click here.

    Evening for Peace

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, click here or contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “Over the last 23 years, we have shown that it is possible to live in peace and friendship without possessing a single nuclear warhead. Our weapon has been mutual trust and respect, transparency and confidence building.”

    Erlan Idrissov, Foreign Minister of Kazakhstan, speaking on the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (September 26).

     

    “When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall – think of it, always.”

    Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948), who was born on October 2. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available in the NAPF Peace Store.

    Editorial Team

     

    Christian Hatchett
    David Krieger
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: September 2014

    Issue #206 – September 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • Nuclear Weapons Do Not Make Us Safer by David Krieger
      • Hiroshima Peace Declaration by Mayor Kazumi Matsui
      • Nagasaki Peace Declaration by Mayor Tomihisa Taue
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up
      • Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit
      • Marshall Islands to Receive Prestigious Peace Prize
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Senators Call for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts
    • War and Peace
      • NATO / Russia Conflict Over Ukraine Intensifies
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • More Cheating in the Ranks
      • Texas County Seeks Nuclear Waste
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons
      • Israeli Nuclear Submarines Near Completion
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • George Takei Visits Hiroshima
      • ICAN Civil Society Forum
      • Don’t Ever Whisper
    • Foundation Activities
      • Paul K. Chappell Speaks to Citizens’ Action for Peace
      • People’s Climate March
      • NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award
    • Quotes

    Perspectives

    Nuclear Weapons Do Not Make Us Safer

    This letter to the editor of the Washington Post was published on August 22, 2014.

    Are NATO-based nuclear weapons really an advantage in a dangerous world, as Brent Scowcroft, Stephen J. Hadley and Franklin Miller suggested in their Aug. 18 op-ed, “A dangerous proposition”? They are not. They make the world a far more dangerous place.

    Nuclear deterrence is not a guarantee of security. Rather, it is a hypothesis about human behavior, a hypothesis that has come close to failing on many occasions. Additionally, nuclear weapons are not “political weapons,” as the writers asserted. They are weapons of mass extermination.

    The United States and the other nuclear-armed countries are obligated under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and/or customary international law to pursue negotiations in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and complete nuclear disarmament. This is the substance of the Nuclear Zero lawsuits brought by the Marshall Islands against the nine nuclear-armed countries at the International Court of Justice and in U.S. federal court. The United States continues to evade its obligations.

    Rather than continuing to posture with its nuclear weapons in Europe, the United States should be leading the way in convening negotiations to eliminate all nuclear weapons for its own security and that of all the world’s inhabitants.

    A link to the letter is here.

    Hiroshima Peace Declaration

    Summer, 69 years later. The burning sun takes us back to “that day.” August 6, 1945. A single atomic bomb renders Hiroshima a burnt plain. From infants to the elderly, tens of thousands of innocent civilians lose their lives in a single day. By the end of the year, 140,000 have died. To avoid forgetting that sacred sacrifice and to prevent a repetition of that tragedy, please listen to the voices of the survivors.

    To read more, click here.

    Nagasaki Peace Declaration

    At this precise moment, 69 years ago, the sky over this hill was covered with a pitch black nuclear cloud. The single atomic bomb, dropped by a United States bomber, blew away houses and engulfed the city in flames. Many fled for their lives through streets littered with charred bodies. 74,000 precious lives were lost to the terrible blast, heat rays and radiation. A further 75,000 people were wounded. Those who narrowly survived were inflicted with deep mental and physical wounds that will never heal, even though 69 years have now passed.

    Nuclear weapons are a continuing danger that threatens the present and future of our entire world. The terror that they bring is not confined to Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s past.

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up

     

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) continued its efforts to compel the United States government to comply with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, asking a Federal Court judge to reject the U.S. government’s claim that the treaty cannot be enforced.

    On August 21, the RMI filed an Opposition to the U.S. motion to dismiss, explaining why the Court cannot and should not look the other way.

    “If the United States’ position is that in treaty disputes ‘might makes right,’ then I ask you, what does it mean – really – when a nation enters into a treaty with the United States?” said Laurie Ashton, attorney with the law firm Keller Rohrback LLP who serves as lead council for the Marshall Islands. “And what does the United States’ position say about its attempts to enforce other treaties, such as the Chemical Weapons Convention (recently against Syria), or, even more recently, the United States’ allegation that Russia is in breach of certain cruise missile test bans?”

    The Marshall Islands Will Not Give Up,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, August 22, 2014.

    Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit

    On the same day that RMI submitted its Opposition to the motion to dismiss, three amicus curiae briefs were filed in support of RMI’s position. All of these organizations are part of the Nuclear Zero campaign to support the lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands against all nine nuclear-armed nations.

    Tri-Valley CAREs argues in its amicus brief that the venue of Northern California is appropriate because the district contains Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, one of the United States’ two major sites for nuclear weapons research, design, development and modernization.

    Nuclear Watch New Mexico (NWNM) argues in its amicus brief that future funding levels for nuclear weapon modernization programs indicate that the U.S. is not committed to its NPT Article VI obligation. NWNM further argues that the United States is creating new military capabilities for U.S. nuclear weapons.

    Pax Christi International, Physicians for Social Responsibility and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War submitted a joint amicus brief. In it, they argue that the risk of nuclear catastrophe is substantial and that even a small regional nuclear war would put two billion people at risk of famine.

    Rick Wayman, “Amicus Curiae Briefs Support Marshall Islands Lawsuit,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, August 28, 2014.

    Marshall Islands to Receive Prestigious Peace Prize

    The International Peace Bureau (IPB), winner of the 1910 Nobel Peace Prize, has been working diligently for peace since its founding in 1891. Every year IPB awards the Sean MacBride Peace Prize to a person or organization that has done outstanding work for peace, disarmament and/or human rights. The 2014 prize will be awarded to the people and government of the Marshall Islands for their courageous lawsuits filed against the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations.

    IPB believes that the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits could be a “significant and decisive step in ending the nuclear arms race and in achieving a world without nuclear weapons.”

    IPB to Award MacBride Peace Prize to the People and Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands for their Courageous Initiative to Rid the World of Nuclear Arms,” International Peace Bureau, August 6, 2014.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Senators Call for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts

     

    A bipartisan group of 26 senators sent a letter to Shaun Donovan, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, calling on President Obama to “support increased funding in the FY2016 budget to more rapidly secure and permanently dispose of nuclear and radiological materials.” They cite the dangers posed to US National Security by “terrorists and rogue states seeking nuclear weapons” as motivation for their proposal.

    The letter comes in response to the President’s proposals over the years to decrease funding for nuclear material security and nonproliferation programs. The senators argue that unsecured nuclear material poses high risks to Americans and thus programs to secure and prevent the spread of nuclear material must be accelerated.

    Merkley, Feinstein Lead Senators in Calling for Greater Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation Efforts,” Office of Senator Jeff Merkley, August 18, 2014.

    War and Peace

    NATO / Russia Conflict Over Ukraine Intensifies

     

    As the Ukrainian Prime Minister submitted a resolution to his Parliament seeking membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Russian President Vladimir Putin used his country’s nuclear arsenal to make an overt threat to Ukraine’s leaders and people. Speaking at a pro-Kremlin youth camp, Putin said, “It’s best not to mess with us… I want to remind you that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers.”

    As NAPF Associate Martin Hellman writes in a recent article, “While NATO membership for Ukraine would almost surely make Russia more caugious in its treatment of that nation, the immediate risk of NATO membership is likely to make Russia much more aggressive in an attempt to prevent that from ever happening.” The risk of conflict between a nuclear-armed NATO and a nuclear-armed Russia is too great for all sides to continue with threatening behavior.

    In a recent op-ed, NAPF New York Representative Alice Slater wrote, “Why do we still have NATO anyway? This Cold War relic is being used to fire up new hostilities and divisions between Russia and the rest of Europe.”

    Alexei Anishchuk, “Don’t Mess with Nuclear Russia, Putin Says,” Reuters, August 29, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    More Cheating in the Ranks

     

    The U.S. Navy has announced that it is kicking out at least 34 sailors for their involvement in a test cheating ring. The sailors operated undetected for at least seven years as they cheated on qualification exams to become certified instructors at the nuclear training unit in Charleston, South Carolina. The unit trains students in nuclear reactor operations in order to serve on the Navy’s nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers.

    Although there was “never any question that the reactors were being operated safely,” according to Adm. John M. Richardson, the cheating was nevertheless “a stunning violation of Navy ethics.” The students and instructors implicated in the cheating ring were not involved in handling nuclear weapons, unlike those caught in a cheating scandal in January at an Air Force base that operates land-based nuclear-armed missiles.

    Robert Burns, “Navy Kicks Out 34 For Nuke Cheating,” Associated Press, August 20, 2014.

    Texas County Seeks Nuclear Waste

    Loving County in Texas, the second least-populous county in the United States (population 95), is seeking to store all of the high-level radioactive waste in the United States. The federal government, with $28 billion to spend after the cancellation of its plan to store the radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, is seeking a new place to store the spent fuel from about 70 reactor sites across the country.

    Local officials believe that the money generated from the storage process would benefit the local economy. The county judge, Skeet Jones, said, “We could build some roads. We could bring in some more water. We could have a town that’s incorporated, have a city council, maybe even start a school… Maybe even have a Walmart.”

    Matthew Wald, “County of 95 Sees Opportunity in Toxic Waste,” The New York Times, August 7, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons

    According to a new report by Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris, there are approximately 16,300 nuclear weapons in the world, located at 98 sites in 14 countries. Approximately 10,000 of these weapons are in military arsenals; the remaining weapons are said to be awaiting dismantlement. The United States and Russia together possess 93% of the nuclear weapons in the world. Approximately 1,800 nuclear weapons are on high alert and ready for use on short notice.

    Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris, “Worldwide Deployments of Nuclear Weapons, 2014,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August 26, 2014.

    Israeli Nuclear Submarines Near Completion

    Three Dolphin II-class submarines ordered by the Israeli Navy are nearly complete as construction continues at Germany’s ThyssenKrup Marine Systems shipyard. Although the Israeli government will not admit it, German defense ministry officials and others believe that Israel intends for the new submarines to be nuclear-armed. The submarine’s maximum distance before refueling puts it in range of Iran, further bolstering Israel’s nuclear deterrence capabilities.

    Robert Beckhusen, “Israel’s Quiet Doomsday Submarines Are Almost Ready,” War is Boring, August 17, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of September, including the “Damascus Incident” profiled in Eric Schlosser’s recent book Command and Control.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    George Takei Visits Hiroshima

     

    Activist and actor George Takei, best known for his role in Star Trek, has made a four-minute video of a recent visit to Hiroshima. Takei, who has strong family ties to Hiroshima, visits the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Park and the Peace Museum, documenting some of the tragedy of the U.S. atomic bombing.

    Click here to watch the video.

    ICAN Civil Society Forum

     

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) has announced a Civil Society Forum to take place in Vienna, Austria on December 6-7. The forum takes place in advance of a government conference on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, also in Vienna.

    Representatives of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, along with many other campaigners, activists, experts, public figures and survivors, will gather to learn and to teach, to energize and be energized, to demonstrate our unity and to demand the end of the era of nuclear weapons. Over a packed but fun-filled two days, we will engage in discussions with the best and brightest voices in the humanitarian disarmament field, hear testimonies from inspirational individuals who know the meaning of courage, develop our campaigning and advocacy skills and, of course, get up to speed on the ins and outs of the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons.

    To learn more about the Civil Society Forum and to register, click here.

    Don’t Ever Whisper

     

    Don’t Ever Whisper is an inspiring story about the life and tragic early death of a Marshallese woman, Darlene Keju, a Pacific health pioneer and champion for nuclear survivors. Darlene is well-known for a moving speech that she gave at the General Assembly of the World Council of Churches in 1983 about the suffering caused by U.S. nuclear and thermonuclear testing.

    David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, said, “This inspiring book will help the reader understand not only the life of an extraordinary woman, but also the ongoing struggles of Marshall Islanders in coping with the consequences of U.S. nuclear weapon testing.”

    To purchase a copy of the book, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Paul K. Chappell Speaks to Citizens’ Action for Peace

     

    On August 15, NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell spoke to Citizens’ Action for Peace in Redlands, California on “The Art of Waging Peace.” Held at the Redlands United Church of Christ, Chappell’s lecture discussed the military, historical, and scientific evidence on whether humanity is naturally violent or naturally peaceful, how American citizens have created positive change in the past, and how we can do so again. He also addressed the rise of fundamentalism and what this tells us about human nature.

    Despite these uncertain political times, Chappell’s talk was viewed as uplifting and motivating. Emmilienne Wallick Colunga, an 18-year-old student at the University of California Riverside, said, “It’s incredibly easy to become discouraged with the state of affairs in today’s world, the injustice and the violence can be overwhelming at times. Paul Chappell brings hope and inspiration back to those that are discouraged with his knowledge of positive change over the decades and confidence that there is a way to change the world that is not through war and hurt – rather through the art of waging peace.”

    For more information on the NAPF Peace Leadership Program, click here. For a full list of Paul’s upcoming lectures and workshops, click here.

    People’s Climate March

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is supporting the People’s Climate March in New York City on September 21. Nuclear weapons and climate change are the two existential threats that face humanity. Both are the result of human activity and both can be eliminated by human ingenuity. Also, even “limited” use of nuclear weapons would create catastrophic climatic consequences that would dwarf the environmental impact of carbon emissions.

    For more information on the People’s Climate March and the September 19-20 Global Climate Convergence for Peace, People and the Planet, click here.

    Nuclear Savage: The Islands of Secret Project 4.1

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host a free screening of the powerful documentary Nuclear Savage: The Islands of Secret Project 4.1 in Santa Barbara on September 25 to mark Nuclear Abolition Day. The documentary by Adam Horowitz exposes the ugly truth behind U.S. atomic testing in the Marshall Islands.

    Commissioned by PBS and winner of multiple film festival awards, Nuclear Savage was abruptly pulled each time it was scheduled to air. It has never been shown on U.S. television.

    For more information on the September 25 screening, click here. To learn more about this documentary, click here. If you are interested in hosting a screening of the documentary in your area, please email NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman at rwayman@napf.org.

    NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “On this International Day against Nuclear Tests, let us all take a fresh look at [the] survivors’ stories. Listen to their words and imagine the effects of these detonations as if they were experienced by each of us. Only then can we can better understand the imperative to renew our commitment to a world free of nuclear weapons and nuclear tests.”

    Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General, commenting on the International Day Against Nuclear Tests (August 29).

     

    “If you want to make peace, you don’t talk to your friends. You talk to your enemies.”

    General Moshe Dyan (1915-1981), Israeli military leader. This quote is featured in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, available in the NAPF Peace Store.

     

    “The world can little afford the trillions of dollars in military spending and trillions and trillions of brain cells wasted on war when our very Earth is under stress and needs the critical attention of our best minds and thinking, and the abundance of resources mindlessly diverted to war to be made available for the challenges confronting us to create a livable future for life on earth.”

    — NAPF Representative Alice Slater. This text also appears in a petition for an independent inquiry into the airplane crash in Ukraine and its catastrophic aftermath.

     

    “We need to find ways of avoiding standing still.”

    Alexander Kmentt, director for Disarmament, Arms Control and Non-Proliferation of the Austrian Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs, commenting on the need to pursue real action for the elimination of all nuclear weapons.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Elliot Serbin
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • Poems from 2014 Sadako Peace Day

    Below are the poems that were read as part of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 20th Annual Sadako Peace Day event on August 6, 2014 at La Casa de Maria Retreat Center in Montecito, California.

    World Peace
    by Tony Johansen

    World Peace
    When it comes
    Will be like buttercups
    Blooming, one at a time
    In an endless field
    Until there are so many buttercups
    You can’t imagine anything else
    So many buttercups
    In a field so endless
    That the boots that are left
    Will be compelled to walk gently
    And when they can’t
    They’ll say, “I’m sorry.”

    I Dream of Sadako
    by Susanna Johansen

    Lovely little girl
    delicate and graceful hands
    dark and shining eyes
    cheerful yet resolute –
    Death marches toward you
    and is slowed
    by the power of your intention
    as you fold paper
    into wings that fly.
    I like to imagine
    that I had no part
    in this drama
    which took place
    before my birth.
    I am from the land of Harry Truman.
    He spoke of his wife with honest admiration.
    He had a way of making a tuxedo look
    as comfortable as an old flannel shirt.
    It makes me feel better
    to imagine
    that we are good people
    who only go to war
    for good reasons.
    Sweet girl,
    I saw you in my dream last night.
    Your legs went weak beneath you
    and suddenly you sat down
    on the soft earth.
    You were amazed to look around you
    and notice
    in the last moments of your life,
    that the world was illuminated
    by a glow the color of rose quartz.
    “Do you see the light?”
    you asked.
    And we stepped toward you
    Silently imploring,
    asking you to stay.
    Your eyes were bright
    and full of forgiveness.
    “The love light is so beautiful,”
    you said with amazement.
    “Do not turn off the light.”

    CRANES on Sadako Peace Day
    by Bettina T. Barrett

    A crane   an orange paper crane
    I folded almost ten years ago
    to celebrate my 75th birthday
    now sits beside the figure of
    a meditating cat
    this crane in memory
    of a poet-friend who died
    and left me feeling very alone

    there are certain mornings when a shaft
    of sunlight strikes this crane
    lights up her color   that orange
    of fire  of dawn’s breaking

    and again I do the folding
    of words   of thoughts that fly
    attach themselves to trees
    gracefully drape over bushes  colors
    of rainbows   a thousand cranes folded
    the fingers of hope
    each one of us spread wide

    I look at my crane
    I look at all these cranes
    and see them again and again
    how that once-oh-so-bright-flare
    of light hit the ground   that heat
    that fire   that giant wound opened –
    and still it burns

    so I take the piece of paper
    fold and fold with now-stiffened fingers ….

    Intelligent Life
    by David Krieger

    When considering the possibilities
    of finding intelligent life in the universe
    I struggle not to become cynical
    and blurt out: shouldn’t we be searching
    for it here on our planet?  I refrain,
    for surely there is intelligent life on Earth.
    It can be found in the songs of birds,
    in the roar of lions, in the conversations
    of dolphins.  It can also be found
    in the songs and dances and literature
    of humans. I want to scream, it is here,
    here on Earth.  We’ve come so far,
    there’s no acceptable reason we won’t
    keep going, no reason we can’t solve
    the great problems that are engulfing us.
    Our ancestors solved problems far
    more difficult than the splitting of the atom
    or the extraction of fossil fuels from the earth.
    They tamed fire, invented the wheel,
    sailed across oceans navigating by the stars.
    Yes, there is intelligent life here,
    embedded in our history and our brains,
    intelligent life that just might see us through
    if we can keep our cynicism in check and
    our hope alive.

  • Sunflower Newsletter: August 2014

    Issue #205 – August 2014

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.
    • Perspectives
      • The Marshall Islands: Sounding a Wakeup Call by David Krieger
      • Open Letter from the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center by Sister Megan Rice
      • What Are Acceptable Nuclear Risks? by Martin Hellman
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • U.S. Moves to Dismiss Nuclear Zero Lawsuit
      • Letter About Nuclear Zero Lawsuits in The New York Times
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. and UK Renew Nuclear Weapon Deal
      • Los Alamos Employee Fired after Writing about Nuclear Weapons Abolition
      • Air Force Changes Grading System to Stop Cheating
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • Are Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders?
      • Top Officer Happy with Air Force Ethics
      • Nuclear Waste Partnership Received Bonus after Radiation Leak
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Russia Accused of Violating Nuclear Treaty
      • Iran Nuclear Negotiations Extended by Four Months
    • War and Peace
      • Last Living Member of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Crew Dies
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • New Study on Consequences of a Small Nuclear Event
    • Foundation Activities
      • Peace Leadership for Youth
      • Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    The Marshall Islands: Sounding a Wakeup Call

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) is an island country in the northern Pacific with a population of approximately 70,000 people. For such a small country, it is making big waves.  As a country at risk of being submerged due to rising ocean levels, the RMI has played a leadership role in the international conferences concerned with climate change.  As a country that suffered 12 years of devastating U.S. nuclear testing, it has also chosen to take action to assure that no other country suffers the fate its citizens have due to nuclear weapons.  It has sued the nine nuclear-armed countries for failing to meet their obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and customary international law to negotiate in good faith for an end to the nuclear arms race and for nuclear disarmament.

    The Marshall Islands has given humanity a wake-up call. Each of us has a choice.  We can wake up, or we can continue our complacent slumber.

    To read more, click here.

    Open Letter from the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center

    We send warm greetings and many thanks to all who actively engage in the transformation of weapons of mass destruction to sustainable life-giving alternatives. Gregory Boertje-Obed (U.S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) Michael Walli (Federal Correctional Institution McKean, Bradford, Pennsylvania) and I are sending you some of our observations and concerns on the 2nd anniversary of our Transform Now Plowshares action.

    There are a number of reasons for what we did. We three were acutely mindful of the widespread loss to humanity that nuclear systems have already caused, and we realize that all life on Earth could be exterminated through intentional, accidental, or technical error.

    To read more, click here.

    What Are Acceptable Nuclear Risks?

    When I read Eric Schlosser’s acclaimed 2013 book, Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety, I found a tantalizing revelation on pages 170-171, when it asked, “What was the ‘acceptable’ probability of an accidental nuclear explosion?” and then proceeded to describe a 1957 Sandia Report, “Acceptable Premature Probabilities for Nuclear Weapons,” which dealt with that question.

    Using the same criterion as this report, which, of course, is open to question, my analysis shows that nuclear terrorism would have to have a risk of at most 0.5% per year to be considered “acceptable.” In contrast, existing estimates are roughly 20 times higher.

    In short, the risks of catastrophes involving nuclear weapons currently appear to be far above any acceptable level. Isn’t it time we started paying more attention to those risks, and taking steps to reduce them?

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    U.S. Moves to Dismiss Marshall Islands Lawsuit

     

    On July 21, 2014, the United States filed a motion to dismiss the Nuclear Zero lawsuit that was filed by the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) on April 24, 2014 in U.S. Federal Court.

    The U.S., in its move to dismiss the RMI lawsuit, does not argue that the U.S. is in compliance with its NPT disarmament obligations. Instead, it argues in a variety of ways that its non-compliance with these obligations is, essentially, justifiable, and not subject to the court’s jurisdiction.

    A response from the Marshall Islands will be submitted to the Court by August 21.

    U.S. Moves to Dismiss Marshall Islands Lawsuit,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, July 22, 2014.

    Letter About Nuclear Zero Lawsuits in The New York Times

     

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman had a letter to the editor published in The New York Times on July 15. The letter was a response to The Times‘ editorial about India’s potential membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

    In his letter, Wayman wrote, “Your suggestion that India negotiate with Pakistan and China for an end to that region’s nuclear arms race would be a good start to fulfilling its existing international legal obligations. But good-faith negotiations must also go beyond India’s immediate rivals to include all nine nuclear-armed countries.”

    He continued, “India’s pursuit of Nuclear Suppliers Group membership is not merely a question of trade and commerce. It is a question of whether known nuclear proliferators will be rewarded or held accountable under international law.”

    Rick Wayman, “Pressure on the Nuclear Nine,” The New York Times, July 15, 2014.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. and UK Officially Renew Nuclear Weapon Deal

     

    U.S. and British officials quietly agreed last week to a 10-year renewal of the 1958 Mutual Defense Agreement (MDA). The only indication that a new deal had been struck was a message from President Obama to Congress, in which he acknowledged that the deal will, among other things, “permit the transfer between the United States and the United Kingdom of classified information concerning atomic weapons.”

    The deal signals continued cooperation between the two governments regarding nuclear warhead designs and development. Critics of the deal contend that it is in violation of Article 1 of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which prohibits nuclear weapon states from transferring “to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons… or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly…”

    Richard Norton-Taylor, “UK-US Sign Secret New Deal on Nuclear Weapons,” The Guardian, July 29, 2014.

    Los Alamos Employee Fired after Writing about Nuclear Weapons Abolition

    James Doyle, a nonproliferation expert at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, was fired after writing an article in his personal capacity that supported the abolition of nuclear weapons. After receiving clearance from the Lab to publish the article, officials retroactively declared the article classified a few days later.

    Doyle believes that his firing was retribution for his refusal to stay on message and support the Lab’s central mission, namely its continued development and production of nuclear arms, at a cost of almost $2 billion per year there.

    Jay Coghlan, Executive Director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, said, “[This was] a clear political firing and abuse of classification procedures. Why are we paying tens of millions in profits to the private contractors running LANL? We demand that federal overseers intervene, reprimand the Lab, reinstate James Doyle, fire those responsible for his political firing, and cut contractor award fees because of chronically poor performance and leadership.”

    Douglas Birch, “Nuclear Weapons Lab Employee Fired After Publishing Scathing Critique of the Arms Race,” Center for Public Integrity, July 31, 2014.

    Air Force Changes Grading System to Stop Cheating

     

    In an effort to combat cheating on monthly preparedness tests, the Air Force is changing its grading system for its nuclear missile corps. Tests will now be pass-fail, and individual scores will not be reported, in a major shift away from the “perfection” culture that required at least a 90 percent to pass. The new test regime focuses more on “practical skills,” emphasizing that “as a team, [missile crews] need to make the right decisions, but as individuals they’re not required to be perfect.”

    Changing the grading system may reduce the incentive to cheat, but may not resolve all the missile corps problems. Bruce Blair, former missile officer and head of Global Zero, argues that missile crews have lost a sense of importance in their job, as “their mission is no longer the priority it was” during the Cold War era.

    Geoff Brumfiel, “To Stop Cheating, Nuclear Officers Ditch the Grades,” NPR, July 28, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    Are Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders?

     

    Comedian John Oliver delivered a scathing 15-minute report on the status of U.S. nuclear weapons on his HBO program Last Week Tonight.

    Facts presented by Oliver include:

    • Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous things on Earth;
    • The United States has a lot of them;
    • Some are controlled by floppy disks;
    • We’ve nearly dropped them on ourselves a few times;
    • No one seems to care about any of those facts.

    To watch the episode, click here.

    Carol Hartsell, “John Oliver Calls Americans Nuclear Weapon Hoarders,” The Huffington Post, July 28, 2014.

    Top Officer Happy with Air Force Ethics

    Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh is “very happy” with the “ethical fabric” of the United States Air Force, despite a recent series of scandals involving the nuclear-missile corps. In an interview, Gen. Welsh said “[W]e do not have an epidemic of bad ethical behavior by people across the Air Force.”

    The Air Force’s intercontinental ballistic missile mission has been the site of a number of recent incidents.  These include a test-cheating ring at the Montana ICBM base, security lapses by officers on missile-launch duty, and allegations of drug possession. Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the strategic missile mission, was forced to retire last year after drunken behavior while on an official trip to Russia.

    Welsh Gives Air Force Top Ethics Marks,” Air Force Times, July 25, 2014.

    Nuclear Waste Partnership Received Bonus after Radiation Leak

     

    Just five days after a radiation leak at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, an underground nuclear waste dump near Carlsbad, New Mexico, the Department of Energy awarded a $1.9 million bonus to Nuclear Waste Partnership, the contractor overseeing the site. It is unclear why officials went ahead with the bonus, as an investigation into what caused the February 14 leak “revealed a number of operational lapses by Nuclear Waste Partnership.”

    WIPP has remained closed since the incident in February, which contaminated at least 20 workers. The cause of the leak is still under investigation.

    Atomic Waste Site Contractor Received Large Bonus Days After Leak,” Global Security Newswire, July 21, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Russia Accused of Violating Nuclear Treaty

     

    In a letter to President Putin, President Obama accused Russia of violating the 1987 Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty by testing a prohibited ground-launched cruise missile. The treaty prohibits the U.S. or Russia from possessing, producing or testing ground-launched cruise missiles with a range of 500 – 5,500 kilometers.

    President Obama has declared that the United States will not retaliate by deploying its own ground-launched cruise missiles. However, he has left open the possibility of deploying air- or sea-based cruise missiles, which are permissible under the terms of the treaty.

    Michael R. Gordon, “U.S. Says Russia Tested Cruise Missile, Violating Treaty,” The New York Times, July 28, 2014.

    Iran Nuclear Negotiations Extended by Four Months

    After failing to reach a deal by the July 20 deadline, all parties in the Iran nuclear negotiations agreed to a four-month extension. Wendy Sherman, lead negotiator for the United States, said, “Our intent is absolutely to end this on Nov. 24 in one direction or another.” Negotiations are likely to resume in September.

    Patricia Zengerle, “U.S. Nuclear Negotiator Declines Setting Deadline on Iran Deal,” Reuters, July 29, 2014.

    War and Peace

    Last Living Member of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Crew Dies

     

    The last member of the crew that deployed the first atomic bomb during wartime died on July 28 in Georgia at the age of 93. Theodore “Dutch” VanKirk was a navigator on the Enola Gay, the B-29 Superfortress that dropped the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. The explosion and its aftereffects killed 140,000.

    While VanKirk once said that the bombing hastened the end of World War II and “saved lives in the long run,” he also recognized the futility of war and the importance of nuclear disarmament. In a 2005 interview, VanKirk told the Associated Press, “I personally think there shouldn’t be any atomic bombs in the world – I’d like to see them all abolished.”

    Kate Brumback, “Last Crew Member of Enola Gay Dies in Georgia,” Associated Press, July 30, 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of August, including the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945) and the Soviet Union’s first nuclear test (August 29, 1949).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    New Study on Consequences of a Small Nuclear Event

     

    A new study published in Earth’s Future warns of the dangerous consequences of a small nuclear event. Using a more comprehensive computer model of Earth’s climate system, the authors find that the detonation of 50 15-kiloton bombs (small weapons in comparison to those in the arsenals of the U.S., Russia, China, and France) in a regional war between India and Pakistan could lead to global cooling for at least 15 years.

    This global cooling, in combination with major ozone loss, would have a catastrophic effect on global agriculture. Pressures on the global food supply could “significantly degrade global food security or even produce a global nuclear famine.” The authors hope that the study will help societies “better understand the urgent need to eliminate this danger worldwide.”

    John Loretz, “Things Could Always Be Worse… A Lot Worse,” IPPNW Peace & Health Blog, July 16, 2014.

    Foundation Activities

    Peace Leadership for Youth

     

    NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell spent three days in July teaching teens in AHA! (Attitude. Harmony. Achievement.) in Santa Barbara about waging peace. Participants learned about the roots of violence and avenues toward healing through short lectures, videos, clips, interactive discussions, and activities, including skits demonstrating nonviolent ways to resolve conflict.

    Chappell said, “I was grateful for the opportunity to discuss the peace leadership skills I wish I had known when I was sixteen. Those skills–such as the ability to calm myself and others down, resolve conflict, increase my empathy, and heal the causes of aggression–would have benefitted me immensely.”

    For more information on this event, click here.

    Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    On August 6, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will participate in three events commemorating the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively.

    NAPF’s 21st Annual Sadako Peace Day will be held at La Casa de Maria in Montecito, California, at 6:00 p.m. This year’s featured speaker is NAPF Board member Robert Laney. The event is free and open to the public.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will attend a commemoration event at the gates of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), where many U.S. nuclear weapons have been designed and developed. A whopping 89% of LLNL’s budget request for 2015 is for nuclear weapon activities.  The theme of this year’s Bay Area commemoration event is “Failure to Disarm.” Rick has been invited to speak about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, which directly address the failure of all nine nuclear-armed nations to disarm. For more information on the Bay Area event, click here.

    Rick will also participate in a webinar hosted by Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) on August 6 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. He will be discussing the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, and will be joined by Neisen Laukon, a woman from the Marshall Islands who has been affected by U.S. nuclear weapons tests. The webinar is free and open to the public. To register, click here.

    NAPF Distinguished Peace Leadership Award

     

    On November 16, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host its 31st Annual Evening for Peace. This year’s Distinguished Peace Leader is Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the social justice organization CODEPINK and the international human rights organization Global Exchange.

    Medea Benjamin has been on the front lines for thirty years, shining light on the struggles of the world’s innocent and poor.

    For more information about the Evening for Peace, contact the Foundation at (805) 965-3443.

    Quotes

     

    “We must learn the lessons of history, that we may learn to identify and avoid the paths that lead to war.”

    Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. This quote is featured in the NAPF book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “Concerns about the ability of facilities here to withstand an earthquake, and what will happen if they fail, are at the heart of safety concerns at Y12. The new report from the US Geological Survey says the risk in Oak Ridge is increased beyond what was believed in 2008. In fact, the increase is among the highest in the nation.”

    Ralph Hutchison, Coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, calling for a new Environmental Impact Statement at the Y12 nuclear weapons complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

     

    “The World Council of Churches central committee… calls on member churches and related ministries and networks to… support the lawsuit filed by the Marshall Islands against the nuclear-armed states at the International Court of Justice.”

    Statement from the World Council of Churches.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Elliot Serbin
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • U.S. Conference of Mayors Calls for Nuclear Disarmament

    The U.S. Conference of Mayors unanimously adopted this resolution at its 82nd annual meeting in Dallas, Texas, in June 2014.

    Resolution No. 119: Calling for Constructive Good Faith U.S. Participation in International Nuclear Disarmament Forums

    US Conference of Mayors logoWHEREAS, Article VI of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), which entered into force in 1970, and is part of the supreme law of the land pursuant to Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, states: “Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament”; and

    WHEREAS, in 1996, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the judicial branch of the United Nations (UN) and the highest court in the world on questions of international law, issued an authoritative interpretation of Article VI, unanimously concluding: “There exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control”; and

    WHEREAS, forty-four years after the NPT entered into force, an estimated 16,400 nuclear weapons, most held by the U.S. and Russia, pose an intolerable threat to humanity, and there are no disarmament negotiations on the horizon; and

    WHEREAS, the U.S. and the eight other nuclear weapon possessing states are investing an estimated $100 billion annually to maintain and modernize their nuclear arsenals while actively planning to deploy nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future; and

    WHEREAS, the U.S.-Russian conflict over the Ukraine may lead to a new era of confrontation between nuclear-armed powers, and nuclear tensions in the Middle East, Southeast Asia and on the Korean peninsula remind us that the potential for nuclear war is ever present; and

    WHEREAS, in December 2012, the UN General Assembly established a working group open to all member states (the “Open-Ended Working Group”) “to develop proposals to take forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations for the achievement and maintenance of a world without nuclear weapons,” and scheduled for September 26, 2013 the first-ever High-Level meeting of the UN General Assembly devoted to nuclear disarmament; and

    WHEREAS, in December 2013, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution which: “Calls for the urgent commencement of negotiations, in the Conference on Disarmament, for the early conclusion of a comprehensive convention on nuclear weapons to prohibit their possession, development, production, acquisition, testing, stockpiling, transfer and use or threat of use, and to provide for their destruction;”…. “Decides to convene, no later than 2018, a United Nations high-level international conference on nuclear disarmament to review the progress made in this regard;” and “Declares 26 September as the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons devoted to furthering this objective, including through enhancing public awareness and education about the threat posed to humanity by nuclear weapons and the necessity for their total elimination;” and

    WHEREAS, delegations representing 146 States, the UN, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement and civil society organizations participated in the Second Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons held in Nayarit, Mexico, February 13-14, 2014, to discuss global and long-term consequences of any nuclear detonation, accidental or deliberate, including impacts on public health, humanitarian assistance, the economy, the environment, climate change, food security and risk management; and

    WHEREAS, Juan Manuel Gómez Robledo, Mexico’s Vice Minister for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights, Chair of the Nayarit Conference, concluded: “The broad-based and comprehensive discussions on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons should lead to the commitment of States and civil society to reach new international standards and norms, through a legally binding instrument … [The] time has come to initiate a diplomatic process conducive to this goal… compris[ing] a specific timeframe, the definition of the most appropriate fora, and a clear and substantive framework … The 70th anniversary of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks is the appropriate milestone to achieve our goal”; and

    WHEREAS, August 6 and 9, 2015 will mark the 70th anniversaries of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed more that 210,000 people by the end of 1945, while the remaining “hibakusha” (A-bomb survivors) continue to suffer from the physical and psychological effects of the bombings; and

    WHEREAS, the people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) continue to suffer from the health and environmental impacts of 67 above-ground nuclear weapons test explosions conducted by the U.S. in their islands between 1946 and 1958, the equivalent of 1.6 Hiroshima-sized bombs detonated daily for 12 years; and

    WHEREAS, the RMI on April 24, 2014 filed landmark cases in the ICJ against the U.S. and the eight other nuclear-armed nations claiming that they have failed to comply with their obligations, under the NPT and customary international law, to pursue negotiations for the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons, and filed a companion case in U.S. Federal District Court; and

    WHEREAS, the Administration’s FY 2015 budget request for maintenance and modernization of nuclear bombs and warheads, at more than $8.7 billion, in constant dollars exceeds the amount spent in 1985 for comparable work at the height of President Reagan’s surge in nuclear weapons spending, which was the highest point of Cold War spending; and

    WHEREAS, this enormous commitment to modernizing nuclear bombs and warheads and the laboratories and factories to support those activities does not include even larger amounts of funding for planned replacements of delivery systems – the bombers, missiles and submarines that form the strategic triad; in total, according to the General Accounting Office, the U.S. will spend more than $700 billion over the next 30 years to maintain and modernize nuclear weapons systems; the James Martin Center places the number at an astounding one trillion dollars; and

    WHEREAS, this money is desperately needed to address basic human needs such as housing, food security, education, healthcare, public safety, education and environmental protection; and

    WHEREAS, the U.S. Conference of Mayors has adopted resolutions each year since 2010 calling for deep cuts in nuclear weapons spending and redirection of those funds to meet the needs of cities and adopted an additional resolution in 2011 “Calling on Congress to Redirect Military Spending to Domestic Needs”; and in 2013 called on the U.S. to participate in good faith in the UN Open-Ended Working Group and High-Level Meeting on nuclear disarmament, and the Nayarit Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons; and

    WHEREAS, Mayors for Peace continues to advocate for the immediate commencement of negotiations to eliminate nuclear weapons by 2020 and its membership has grown ten fold since the “2020 Vision Campaign” was launched in 2003, surpassing 6,000 members in 158 countries, representing one seventh of the world’s population; and Mayors for Peace, with members in the U.S. and Russia; India and Pakistan, and Israel, Palestine and Iran can be a real force for peace.

    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that U.S. Conference of Mayors expresses its deep concern that the UN Open-Ended Working Group on nuclear disarmament and the Nayarit Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons took place without the participation of the U.S., Russia, the United Kingdom, France and China; that at the September 26, 2013 UN High-Level Meeting on nuclear disarmament, the U.S. joined with France and the UK in a profoundly negative statement, delivered by a junior British diplomat: “While we are encouraged by the increased energy and enthusiasm around the nuclear disarmament debate, we regret that this energy is being directed toward initiatives such as this High-Level Meeting, the humanitarian consequences campaign, the Open-Ended Working Group and the push for a Nuclear Weapons Convention”; and that the U.S. voted against the 2013 UN General Assembly resolution calling for urgent commencement of negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament for the early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. to participate constructively and in good faith in the Third Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons to be hosted by Austria in Vienna, December 8-9, 2014, and to press the other nuclear weapon states to do likewise; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. to participate constructively and in good faith in urgent commencement of negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament for the early conclusion of a comprehensive convention on nuclear weapons, and to press the other nuclear weapon states to do likewise; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors commends the Republic of the Marshall Islands for calling to the world’s attention the failure of the nine nuclear-armed states to comply with their international obligations to pursue negotiations for the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons, and calls on the U.S. to respond constructively and in good faith to the lawsuits brought by the RMI; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. to demonstrate a good faith commitment to its disarmament obligation under Article VI of the NPT by commencing a process to negotiate the global elimination of nuclear weapons within a timebound framework, under strict and effective international control, at the May 2015 NPT Review Conference, and to press the other nuclear weapon states to do likewise; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors urges President Obama to engage in intensive diplomatic efforts to reverse the deteriorating U.S. relationship with Russia; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the President and Congress to reduce nuclear weapons spending to the minimum necessary to assure the safety and security of the existing weapons as they await disablement and dismantlement, and to redirect those funds to meet the urgent needs of cities; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on its membership to proclaim September 26 in their cities as the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons and to support activities to enhance public awareness and education about the threat posed to humanity by nuclear weapons and the necessity for their total elimination; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors welcomes the appointment of Akron, Ohio and Mayor Donald Plusquellic as a Mayors for Peace regional lead city, and encourages all U.S. mayors for join Mayors for Peace; and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors expresses its continuing support for and cooperation with Mayors for Peace.

    Submitted by:

    The Honorable Donald L. Plusquellic
    Mayor of Akron, Ohio

    The Honorable William D. “Bill” Euille
    Mayor of Alexandria, Virginia

    The Honorable Denny Doyle
    Mayor of Beaverton, Oregon

    The Honorable Mark Kleinschmidt
    Mayor of Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    The Honorable William E. “Bill” Gluba
    Mayor of Davenport, Iowa

    The Honorable T.M. Franklin Cownie
    Des Moines, Iowa

    The Honorable Luigi Boria
    Mayor of Doral, Florida

    The Honorable Roy D. Buol
    Mayor of Dubuque, Iowa

    The Honorable William V. “Bill” Bell
    Mayor of Durham, North Carolina

    The Honorable Salvatore J. Panto, Jr.
    Mayor of Easton, Pennsylvania

    The Honorable Kitty Piercy
    Mayor of Eugene, Oregon

    The Honorable Ed Malloy
    Mayor of Fairfield, Iowa

    The Honorable Joy Cooper
    Mayor of Hallandale Beach, Florida

    The Honorable Alex Morse
    Mayor of Holyoke, Massachusetts

    The Honorable Mark Stodola
    Mayor of Little Rock, Arkansas

    The Honorable Paul Soglin
    Mayor of Madison, Wisconsin

    The Honorable McKinley Price
    Mayor of Newport News, Virginia

    The Honorable Chris Koos
    Mayor of Normal, Illinois

    The Honorable Frank Ortis
    Mayor of Pembroke Pines, Florida

    The Honorable Michael Brennan
    Mayor of Portland, Maine

    The Honorable Gayle McLaughlin
    Mayor of Richmond, California

    The Honorable Ardell Brede
    Mayor of Rochester, Minnesota

    The Honorable Stephen Cassidy
    Mayor of San Leandro, California

    The Honorable Pam O’Connor
    Mayor of Santa Monica, California

    The Honorable Neil King
    Mayor of Taos Ski Valley, New Mexico

    The Honorable Laurel Lunt Prussing
    Mayor of Urbana, Illinois

    The Honorable Geraldine Muoio
    Mayor of West Palm Beach, Florida

  • NAPF Poetry Contest Deadline Is July 1

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s annual poetry contest is accepting entries through July 1. The Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards are an annual series of awards to encourage poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. The Awards include three categories: adult, youth (13-18), and youth (12 & under).

    For more information on the poetry contest, click here.

  • Sunflower Newsletter: June 2014

    Issue #203 – June 2014

    Facebook Twitter More...

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits are proceeding at the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal District Court. Sign the petition supporting the Marshall Islands’ courageous stand, and stay up to date on progress at www.nuclearzero.org.

    • Perspectives
      • We Must End the Madness of Nuclear Weapons by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and David Krieger
      • The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Who Will Speak for the People? by Jody Williams and Bob Dodge
      • War Makes Us Poorer by Paul K. Chappell
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • U.S. Files Notice of Appearance in U.S. Federal District Court
      • Taking the Nuclear Powers to Court
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Nuclear Savage
      • B61 Nuclear Bomb Upgrade Reaches Milestone
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • Is Kitty Litter Responsible for Radiation Leak?
      • Air Force Flunks Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test
    • Nuclear Proliferation
      • Nuclear Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Online Course on Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF Briefing Paper for the NPT PrepCom
      • Disarmament Education Report for the UN Secretary-General
      • Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • NAPF Peace Poetry Contest – Deadline July 1
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    We Must End the Madness of Nuclear Weapons

    Until now, no one has held nuclear-armed nations accountable for their continued possession of nuclear weapons. Last month, the Republic of the Marshall Islands courageously took the nine nuclear weapons-wielding Goliaths to the International Court of Justice to enforce compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty and customary international law.

    The people of the Marshall Islands are standing up to say that it’s time to end the era of nuclear madness. They are joined by Nobel Peace Laureates, and leaders and experts from every field who support this historic legal action.

    We call on President Obama and the leaders of the other nuclear weapon states to fulfill their legal obligation to negotiate in good faith to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons. It is not unrealistic to ask that the world’s most powerful governments start obeying the law and keeping their promises.

    Nothing good has ever come of nuclear weapons. Nothing good ever will. For the sake of all humanity, current and future, it’s time to respect the law and keep the promise.

    To read more, click here.

    The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Who Will Speak for the People?

    The U.N. just concluded the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Preparatory Committee with representatives from the 189 signatory nations and of civil society. The meeting was in preparation for next year’s NPT conference and to discuss the current status of fulfilling the obligations under the treaty and in particular, the mandate of the nuclear weapons states for global disarmament. The outcome was a continued foot dragging by the nuclear states motivating a demand for meaningful steps and progress toward disarmament by the other 184 nations in view of current international events.

    Recent scientific studies by the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War on the humanitarian consequences of limited nuclear war have shed additional light on the danger these weapons pose.  Describing a hypothetical conflict between India and Pakistan using less than ½ of 1 percent of the global nuclear arsenals, the studies confirm 2 billion people would be at risk of dying due to global climatic change.

    Combined with recent scandals involving U.S. ICBM missile controllers and a growing accounting of nuclear mishaps and near misses in our nuclear forces over the years, the sense of urgency for disarmament is greater than ever. It has become a question of who will step forward and speak for humanity.

    To read more, click here.

    War Makes Us Poorer

    When I began my senior year at West Point in August 2001, I took a class on national security that greatly influenced me. It was the first time I had seriously questioned the size of the U.S. military budget. My professor was a West Point graduate, Rhodes scholar, and major in the army. One day he walked in the classroom and wrote the names of eighteen countries on the board. He then looked at us and said, “The United States spends more on its military than the next eighteen countries in the world combined. Why do we need that much military spending? Isn’t that insane?”

    My professor then explained that immense war spending impoverishes the American people. None of the students in the class said anything. I was shocked by what he told us and did not know how to respond. Disturbed by our silence, he said, “I’m surprised you all aren’t more outraged by this. Why do we need that much military spending?”

    To read more, click here.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    U.S. Files Notice of Appearance in U.S. Federal District Court

     

    On May 29, 2014, the United States government filed the required “Notice of Appearance” with the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

    The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. on April 24, 2014 for breaches of Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Similar lawsuits were filed against all nine nuclear-armed nations (United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, North Korea) in the International Court of Justice.

    This filing demonstrates that the United States will indeed be appearing to defend itself and its agencies in court in this unprecedented lawsuit.

    Rick Wayman, “U.S. Government Files Official Notice of Appearance,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, May 29, 2014.

    Taking the Nuclear Powers to Court

     

    David Swanson, host of Talk Nation Radio and a key organizer in the World Beyond War movement, interviewed NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands. In this 30-minute interview, Rick addresses questions about why the Marshall Islands took this unprecedented action, what exactly is alleged in the lawsuits, and what to expect next.

    In a different interview, Blase Bonpane, Director of Office of the Americas, interviewed NAPF President David Krieger and NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg about the lawsuits. Click here for the interview on KPFK’s World Focus program.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Nuclear Savage

    An independent documentary entitled “Nuclear Savage,” yet to be shown on-air or online in the U.S., exposes for the first time solid evidence of U.S. knowledge regarding the lasting effects of nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands. Screenwriter and producer Adam Horowitz is unequivocal in asserting that the evidence conclusively shows that the contamination of the Marshall atolls wasn’t an accident, as the government previously claimed, but rather was the result of a premeditated, minutely planned, and cynically executed experiment to establish the long-term effects of radiation poisoning on humans.

    For instance, before insisting in 1957 that the island of Rongelap was safe for habitation, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission official Merril Eisenbud wrote, “That island is by far the most contaminated place on earth and it will be very interesting to get a measure of human uptake when people live in a contaminated environment.” The U.S. has been largely unresponsive to the islanders efforts to seek restitution. Beyond initial compensation of $150 million, the U.S. government has refused to recognize further responsibility for what it previously called an “accident.”

    “Getting the story told and in the public view is hard,” Horowitz says. “But it is an important story.”

    For more information on “Nuclear Savage” and to watch the preview, click here.

    Peter Calder, “America’s Shame: The N-bomb Guinea Pigs,” The New Zealand Herald, May 17, 2014.

    B61 Nuclear Bomb Upgrade Reaches Milestone

     

    Sandia National Laboratory reached a key milestone in upgrading the B61 nuclear bomb. Sandia conducted a week-long wind tunnel test to measure the nuclear bomb’s performance at the speed of sound.

    In one of the biggest projects Sandia has undertaken since the end of the Cold war, it is working with both the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the U.S. Air Force to extend the nuclear bomb’s lifetime by at least 20 years while adding new military capabilities.

    One of the recent changes includes advancing it from “dumb” to “smart” bomb via a new guided tail kit assembly. All current B61 models are gravity bombs to be dropped over targets. They currently do not have guidance systems that could pinpoint them for greater accuracy once released.

    Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons analyst with the Federation of American Scientists, has raised concerns about the modernization program, and the new tail kit for the B61 in particular. He said, “This is the first real nuclear bomb program after the Cold War that’s adding significant new capabilities. It raises the question, is the U.S. back in the nuclear bomb business?”

    Kevin Robinson-Avila, “Overhauling the Nation’s Nuclear Arsenal: Sandia National Labs Achieves B61 Milestone,” Albuquerque Journal, May 18, 2014.

    Nuclear Insanity

    Is Kitty Litter Responsible for Radiation Leak?

     

    Officials at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico have been working to discover the cause of a radiation leak in February 2014 at the underground nuclear waste storage site, exposing at least 22 workers to elevated radiation levels. One theory now being investigated is whether kitty litter that was used to absorb moisture inside sealed barrels of nuclear waste caused a chemical reaction. Los Alamos National Laboratory, where the waste in question originated, switched from non-organic to organic kitty litter in 2013.

    There are at least 500 barrels of nuclear waste containing organic kitty litter scattered among three sites: a storage cavern a half-mile underground at WIPP; the grounds of Los Alamos National Lab; and a commercial disposal site in West Texas.

    Jeri Clausing, “Q&A: Is Cat Litter to Blame for Nuke Dump Leak?Associated Press, May 23, 2014.

    Air Force Flunks Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test

     

    Security forces at a U.S. Air Force base failed to speedily recover a stolen nuclear weapon in a drill conducted in 2013. According to an Air Force review of the event, the team showed an “inability to effectively respond to a recapture scenario” due to insufficient training and lack of familiarity with “complex scenario” exercises and shortcomings in “leadership culture.”

    The Air Force nuclear missile corps has faced a series of recent embarrassments, as reported in previous issues of the Sunflower newsletter. A Minuteman missile commander was removed from his post last October after the Pentagon concluded that he drank too much and cavorted with “suspect” women on an official trip to Russia. And in March 2014, the Air Force fired nine commanders at Malmstrom Air Force Base amid fallout from a cheating scandal.

    Noah Rayman, “Air Force Flunked Stolen Nuclear Weapon Test,” TIME, May 22, 2014.

    Nuclear Proliferation

    Nuclear Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?

     

    Nearly half a century after the five declared nuclear-weapon states in 1968 pledged under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to “pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament,” all of the world’s nuclear-weapon states are busy modernizing their arsenals and continue to reaffirm the importance of such weapons.

    Perpetual nuclear modernization appears to undercut the promises made by the five NPT nuclear-weapon states. Without some form of limitations on the pace and scope of nuclear modernization, the goals of deep cuts in and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons remain elusive and appear increasingly unlikely as continued reaffirmation of the value of nuclear weapons, sustained by a global nuclear competition, threatens to extend the nuclear era indefinitely.

    Hans Kristensen, “Nuclear Weapons Modernization: A Threat to the NPT?Arms Control Today, May 2014.

    Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

     

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the most serious threats that have taken place in the month of June, including the failed launch of a NASA satellite, which dispersed plutonium into the upper atmosphere (April 21, 1964) and the massive radioactive release at Chernobyl (April 26, 1986).

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Online Course on Nuclear Weapons: Environmental, Societal, and Health Effects

     

    Dr. Steven Starr, Senior Scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility and a NAPF Associate, is teaching an online course through the University of Missouri entitled “Nuclear Weapons: Environmental, Societal, and Health Effects.”

    According to Dr. Starr, “The course is fairly comprehensive but is designed to be accessible to those who do not already know a great deal about the subject. I think the class would be of great benefit to, among others, activists who wish to learn more about the historical and technical aspects of nuclear weapons.”

    You do not have to be a University of Missouri student to register for this online course. The class begins on June 2, so don’t wait to register. For more information, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF Briefing Paper for the NPT PrepCom

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation published a briefing paper for the Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepCom, which met at the United Nations in New York from April 28 to May 9, 2014. The briefing paper is entitled “The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Bold Action to Enforce Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.”

    The briefing paper gives a summary of the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits filed by the Marshall Islands against all nine nuclear-armed nations, followed by a copy of the application filed against the United Kingdom in the International Court of Justice.

    To download a copy of the briefing paper, click here.

    Disarmament Education Report for the UN Secretary-General

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has submitted a report on its nuclear disarmament education efforts over the past two years to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

    The NAPF report is added to the work of other non-governmental organizations around the world and is submitted by the Secretary-General to the United Nations General Assembly every two years.

    Click here to download a copy of NAPF’s report.

    Remembering the U.S. Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    On August 6, 2014, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will participate in two events commemorating the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively.

    NAPF’s 21st Annual Sadako Peace Day will be held at La Casa de Maria in Montecito, California, at 6:00 p.m. This year’s featured speaker is NAPF Board member Robert Laney.

    NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman will attend a commemoration event at the gates of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where many U.S. nuclear weapons have been designed and developed. The theme of this year’s Bay Area commemoration event is “Failure to Disarm.” Rick has been invited to speak about the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits, which directly address the failure of all nine nuclear-armed nations to disarm.

    More information about both of these important commemoration events will appear in the July edition of The Sunflower.

    NAPF Poetry Contest Deadline is July 1

     

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s annual poetry contest is now accepting entries. The Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards are an annual series of awards to encourage poets to explore and illuminate positive visions of peace and the human spirit. The Poetry Awards include three age categories: Adult, Youth 13-18, and Youth 12 & Under.

    For more information about the contest, including a full list of rules and instructions on how to enter, click here. The deadline for entries is July 1.

    Quotes

     

    “History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage doesn’t need to be lived again.”

    Maya Angelou, who passed away in May 2014. Her quote is featured in the NAPF book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action.

     

    “The Abe Cabinet’s maneuvers for the exercise of the right to collective self-defense and creating the war-fighting system will not only destroy the Constitutional pacifism, which has ensured peace and safety of Japanese citizens, but lead to the escalation of the vicious cycle of tension in East Asia. We must stop this dangerous move in cooperation with all peace-loving people both in Japan and the rest of the world.”

    Yasui Masakazu, Secretary General of the Japan Council Against A and H Bombs (Gensuikyo). He is referring to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s desire to re-interpret Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution.

     

    “We call for urgent negotiations on a treaty to ban the use, manufacture, stockpiling and possession of nuclear weapons as a first step towards their complete eradication.”

    — From a motion adopted by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) World Congress on May 23, 2014.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger

    Grant Stanton

    Wakana Suzuki

    Carol Warner

    Rick Wayman