Author: A. Stanley Thompson

  • No Money for New Nuclear Weapons or Testing

    The United States detonated 1,032 nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere, under the ocean, and underground between 1945 and 1992 that devastated local communities. Though the U.S. has not conducted a full-scale underground nuclear test in 25 years, resurgent nuclear threats are gaining intensity in the Trump administration. More than inflammatory rhetoric from the President, neocons, nuclear lab managers, and others are urging Trump to hit the accelerator on new nuclear warheads and the underground explosions needed to test them.

    Public pressure from ordinary Americans was essential in halting explosive U.S. nuclear testing in the atmosphere and underground 25 years ago. We must act now to halt funding for a new arms race.

    Join us as we urge White House Budget Office Director, Mick Mulvaney, and the Armed Services and Appropriations Committees of the US Congress not to fund programs that may lead to resumption of nuclear test explosions or new nuclear weapons.

  • Sunflower Newsletter: December 2017

    Issue #245 – December 2017

    Invest in Peace this Holiday Season. Shop for everyone on your gift list and benefit the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation at Amazon Smile and at our online Peace Store. Support the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation by making a tax-deductible gift today. Thank you.

    Facebook Twitter Addthis

    • Perspectives
      • Decoding Donald by David Krieger
      • Women Leaders Aren’t Making Enough Foreign Policy Decisions, and it’s a Problem by Meredith Horowski and Lillyanne Daigle
      • Address to Nuclear Disarmament Conference by Pope Francis
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • U.S. Tweeted False Information About Its Nuclear Arsenal
      • University of Texas Seeks to Manage U.S. Nuclear Weapons Lab
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • ICAN to Accept Nobel Peace Prize on December 10
      • Mexico Ratifies Nuclear Ban Treaty
    • War and Peace
      • South Korea Wants to Cancel Military Drills During Winter Olympics
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • Russia Admits Significant Radioactive Leak
    • Nuclear “Modernization”
      • U.S. and Russia Engaged in a Costly New Nuclear Arms Race
      • U.S. Seeks to Violate INF Treaty as Revenge for Russia Violating the INF Treaty
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • The Doomsday Machine: New Book by NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg
      • Cybersecurity, Nuclear Security, Alan Turing, and Illogical Logic
      • Conference on U.S. Foreign Military Bases
      • The Dome
    • Foundation Activities
      • Create Your Own Facebook Fundraiser to Benefit NAPF this Holiday Season
      • Letter in the Los Angeles Times
      • Peace Literacy and Rotary International
      • Rick Wayman Participates in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference
      • New Nukes Are Nuts Merchandise
    • Take Action
      • No Unconstitutional Strike Against North Korea
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Decoding Donald

    The future of the world and of humanity is at the mercy of a lunatic. His name is Donald Trump, and he alone has access to the U.S. nuclear codes. Before he does something rash and irreversible with those codes, it is imperative to decode Donald, taking the necessary steps to remove this power from him.

    Trump is exactly the type of person who should not be anywhere near the nuclear codes. He is not calm, thoughtful, deliberate, cautious, or well-informed. Rather, he is erratic, thin-skinned, narcissistic and self-absorbed. He takes slights personally and likes to punch back hard. He could be insulted and backed into a corner, and decide that nuclear weapons are the solution to what he takes to be taunting behavior. He could be awakened at 3:00 a.m., and make a hasty decision to launch the U.S. nuclear arsenal instead of a tweet.

    To read more, click here.

    Women Leaders Aren’t Making Enough Foreign Policy Decisions, and it’s a Problem

    While women are leading the resistance, the halls of power in D.C. and states across the country lag pathetically behind. We saw this perhaps most vividly when Trump gathered an all-male group of politicians at the White House to discuss his efforts to gut women’s health care. In a single photograph, the gross underrepresentation of women’s voices in government and on issues directly impacting their lives was crystal clear.

    And it was exactly that photograph — and the utterly out-of-sync gender dynamics it laid bare — that stuck in our minds this month as we sat in a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Trump’s unrestrained power to wage nuclear war. A committee with a 20:1 male-to-female ratio heard testimony from three men on whether one man should have total, unchecked power to start a nuclear war and blow up the planet. This is a system that, as Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) said, “boggles the rational mind.”

    Apparently, the Senate has a one-woman limit when it comes to foreign policy.

    To read the full article at Teen Vogue, click here.

    Address to Nuclear Disarmament Conference

    Nor can we fail to be genuinely concerned by the catastrophic humanitarian and environmental effects of any employment of nuclear devices. If we also take into account the risk of an accidental detonation as a result of error of any kind, the threat of their use, as well as their very possession, is to be firmly condemned. For they exist in the service of a mentality of fear that affects not only the parties in conflict but the entire human race. International relations cannot be held captive to military force, mutual intimidation, and the parading of stockpiles of arms. Weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons, create nothing but a false sense of security. They cannot constitute the basis for peaceful coexistence between members of the human family, which must rather be inspired by an ethics of solidarity. Essential in this regard is the witness given by the Hibakusha, the survivors of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, together with other victims of nuclear arms testing. May their prophetic voice serve as a warning, above all for coming generations!

    To read more, click here.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    U.S. Tweeted False Information About Its Nuclear Arsenal

    U.S. Strategic Command, which is in charge of all U.S. nuclear weapons, posted a link on its official Twitter account to an article falsely claiming that the U.S. maintains “secret silos” for its nuclear warheads, and has “B-1 bombers that can drop them from the air.”

    Experts immediately criticized the tweet, since the U.S. does not have secret silos, and B-1 bombers are not nuclear-capable. Tweeting out the article only increases the chance of miscalculation between North Korea and the United States while tensions between the two nuclear powers are already sky-high.

    Alex Ward, “The U.S. Military Tweeted Out Bad Information About Its Nukes. North Korea Will Notice,” Vox, November 15, 2017.

    University of Texas Seeks to Manage U.S. Nuclear Weapons Lab

    The University of Texas (UT) Board of Regents voted 3-2 to submit a bid to manage Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), one of the United States’ two primary nuclear weapons labs. UT submitted an unsuccessful bid to run the lab in 2005.

    LANL has a history of nuclear weapon research and design dating back to the Manhattan Project in the 1940s.

    The lab is currently run by the University of California in a for-profit partnership with Bechtel National, Inc. The University of California has managed the nation’s nuclear weapons labs in New Mexico and California since the labs’ inception.

    Alyssa Goard, “UT System Will Submit Bid to Operate Los Alamos National Laboratory,” KXAN, November 27, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    ICAN to Accept Nobel Peace Prize on December 10

    Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), and Setsuko Thurlow, a survivor of the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima and a tireless campaigner for the abolition of nuclear weapons, will accept the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the global campaign in Oslo on December 10. At least two other survivors of the 1945 atomic bombings are expected to attend.

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has been a Partner Organization in ICAN since its inception in 2007. Setsuko Thurlow is the recipient of NAPF’s 2015 Distinguished Peace Leadership Award and serves on the NAPF Advisory Council.

    Three A-bomb survivors to attend Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in December,” Kyodo, October 27, 2017.

    Mexico Ratifies Nuclear Ban Treaty

    Mexico is the fourth country to ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, as its Senate voted unanimously to approve Mexico’s participation in the treaty. Prohibitions in the treaty include developing, acquiring, storing, using or threatening to use any atomic explosive device or nuclear weapon of any kind.

    Fernando Torres Graciano, president of the National Defense Commission, encouraged other countries to ratify the treaty as well. He said, “Instead of resistance to nuclear disarmament, governments should promote programs to address the most important problems in the world, such as poverty and hunger.”

    In order for the treaty to enter into force, 50 countries must ratify the treaty.

    Mexico’s Senate Approved the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,” Puerto Vallarta News, November 28, 2017.

    War and Peace

    South Korea Wants to Cancel Military Drills During Winter Olympics

    Song Young-gil, the chairman of the Presidential Committee on Northern Economic Cooperation, said that the South Korean government wants to stop joint military drills with the United States during the upcoming PyeongChang Olympic Games.

    “The first step toward alleviating tensions is North Korea’s abandoning of its programs and the U.S. and its allies scaling down of joint military drills, simultaneously,” said Igor Morgulov, Russia’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs.

    The Olympics have long been associated with peace or at least a temporary cessation of hostilities. In 776 BC, a truce was announced before the Olympic games to ensure that the host city was not attacked and that spectators and athletes could attend safely.

    Nam Hyun-woo, “Government Wants to Delay Korea-U.S. Military Drills,” The Korea Times, November 27, 2017.

    Nuclear Insanity

    Russia Admits Significant Radioactive Leak

    Authorities detected a radioactive cloud over Europe between September 27 and October 13. After months of denying anything outside the normal levels of radiation, Russian officials admitted that there was a leak of ruthenium-106 in the southern Urals in September. Levels reached 986 times the normal pollution of the element just south of the Mayak facility, where in 1957 an explosion caused the third-most detrimental radioactive accident in history (the first two being Chernobyl and Fukushima.) It affected 227,000 people, exposing them to lethal amounts of radiation. Many accidents have happened at the facility since its opening in 1948.

    The French nuclear safety institute (IRSN) said that such an event in France would have resulted in several kilometers of evacuation.

    Mark Bennets, “Russia Admits Nuclear Leak Near Site of 1957 Disaster,” The Times, November 21, 2017.

    Nuclear “Modernization”

    U.S. and Russia Engaged in a Costly New Nuclear Arms Race

    In 2010, the Obama administration negotiated the New START treaty with Russia, which limited both sides’ deployed strategic nuclear weapons to 1,550. Despite both countries being on track to meeting the limit by the 2018 deadline, experts and former officials say that the risk of nuclear conflict is far from eliminated. In fact, the stricter limitation on the number of weapons allowed has only spurred both countries to initiate modernization programs to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and lethality of their weapons systems.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the U.S. “modernization” effort will cost $1.25 trillion over 30 years. Supporters of the program argue that it consists primarily of tweaks and improvements, not development of new weapons or capabilities. Critics suggest that the new improvements are so substantial that they will reshape U.S. nuclear capability, making the use of nuclear weapons more tempting. They also point to Russia’s parallel modernization as evidence of a dangerous new arms race.

    Scot Paltrow, “Special Report: in Modernizing Nuclear Arsenal, U.S. Stokes New Arms Race“, U.S. News & World Report, November 21, 2017.

    U.S. Seeks to Violate INF Treaty as Revenge for Russia Violating the INF Treaty

    The Obama administration suspected for years, and later confirmed, that Russia built a missile in violation of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Signed by President Ronald Reagan, the bilateral U.S.-Russian pact prohibits construction, testing or deployment of missiles or delivery systems with a range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers.

    The Trump administration is now supporting Congressional efforts to also violate the INF Treaty by building a cruise missile in the prohibited range.

    “It would be a mistake to believe that the pursuit of a INF-noncompliant cruise missile by the United States will compel Russia to acknowledge and rectify its suspected INF violations,” said Arms Control Association Executive Director Daryl Kimball.

    Josh Rogin, “Russia Has Deployed a Banned Nuclear Missile. Now the U.S. Threatens to Build One,” Washington Post, November 16, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of December, including the December 18, 1970 U.S. nuclear weapon test in Nevada, which resulted in a significant release of radioactive material into the environment.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    The Doomsday Machine: New Book by NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg

    The Doomsday Machine, a new book by NAPF Fellow Daniel Ellsberg, is now available for pre-order. It will be released on December 5. Ellsberg, the legendary whistleblower who revealed the Pentagon Papers, was a presidential advisor and nuclear strategist. The Doomsday Machine is Ellsberg’s hair-raising account of the most dangerous arms build-up in the history of civilization, whose legacy – and proposed renewal under the Trump administration – threatens the very survival of humanity.

    To pre-order the book from Amazon, click here.

    To read a review by NAPF intern Joy Ferguson, a senior at Westmont College, click here.

    Cybersecurity, Nuclear Security, Alan Turing, and Illogical Logic

    NAPF Associate Martin Hellman received the 2015 Association for Computing Machinery Turing Award for his work on cryptography. In his lecture accepting the prestigious award, Hellman makes a strong connection between cybersecurity and nuclear security.

    In examining the risk involved with nuclear weapons, Hellman said, “To put such risk in perspective, even if nuclear deterrence could be expected to work for 500 years before it failed and destroyed civilization—a time horizon that sounds optimistic to most people—it would be equivalent to playing Russian roulette with the life of a child born today. That is because that child’s expected lifetime is roughly one-sixth of 500 years. If the time horizon is more like 100 years, the child’s odds are worse than 50/50.”

    To read Hellman’s full lecture, click here.

    Conference on U.S. Foreign Military Bases

    On January 12-14, 2018, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation is co-sponsoring a conference in Baltimore about the hundreds of U.S. military bases around the world. The unity statement that is the basis for the conference states that “U.S. foreign military bases are the principal instruments of imperial global domination and environmental damage through wars of aggression and occupation, and that the closure of U.S. foreign military bases is one of the first necessary steps toward a just, peaceful and sustainable world.”

    For more information and to register to attend, click here.

    The Dome

    The program Foreign Correspondent on Australia’s ABC TV has produced a new documentary entitled “The Dome.” The program examines the toxic legacy of the Runit Dome, an 18-inch-thick concrete dome constructed by the United States in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The dome contains highly-toxic waste from many of the United States’ 67 nuclear weapons tests conducted in the Marshall Islands from 1946-58.

    The concrete dome, which was intended to last for hundreds of years, is already cracked and leaking. Rising sea levels and the increased intensity of storms due to climate change threaten an even greater catastrophe.

    To watch the 41-minute documentary, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    Create Your Own Facebook Fundraiser to Benefit NAPF this Holiday Season

    NAPF intern Aidan Powers-Riggs, a student at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has made a video for NAPF supporters explaining how to create a fundraiser to benefit NAPF from one’s personal Facebook page.

    Aidan walks viewers through each step in the simple process. This is a great way for individuals to support the important work of NAPF while sharing their passion for peace and nuclear disarmament with their Facebook community.

    To watch the 3-minute video, click here.

    Letter in the Los Angeles Times

    On November 24, the Los Angeles Times published a letter to the editor by NAPF Director of Programs Rick Wayman. Rick’s letter was in response to an editorial opposing the “Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2017” introduced in Congress by Rep. Ted Lieu and Sen. Ed Markey. The LA Times editors argued that it is vital for President Trump to retain the unilateral authority to use nuclear weapons first against an adversary.

    Wayman wrote in part, “Deterrence will only work up until the moment that it fails. Once it fails, we will only have a moment to regret not taking action when we had the chance.”

    To read the full letter, click here.

    Peace Literacy and Rotary International

    On November 10, 2017, Paul K. Chappell, NAPF Peace Leadership Director, spoke about peace literacy and our shared humanity to over 500 former, current, and future Rotary district governors from six states and Vancouver Island at the Rotary International Institute, Zones 25/26. This represented a new level of interaction between NAPF and one of the world’s largest service organizations with a background of almost 100 years of peace projects and initiatives.

    Recommended by a Rotarian with strong ties to the Dayton International Peace Museum, Chappell began his journey with Rotary in April 2015 with his talk on “Why Peace Is Possible,” at the Southwestern Ohio Rotary District 6670 conference. The event generated comments such as, “He [Paul] presents a unique view on peace that makes you really start to think,” “Very practical approach in presentation,” and “I was changed. I went in thinking that peace was impossible. Left thinking that there is a way to spread peace. Slow and steady, like curing polio.”

    To read more about Paul’s involvement with Rotary International, click here.

    Rick Wayman Participates in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference

    NAPF’s Director of Programs Rick Wayman was invited to participate in the Vatican’s November 10-11 conference “Prospects for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament.” On the first day of the conference, Rick had the honor of hearing Pope Francis deliver an address on nuclear disarmament (see Perspectives, above) and to personally exchange greetings with the pontiff.

    For those in the Santa Barbara area, Rick will report back on the Vatican trip at a meeting at the NAPF headquarters on December 6 at 2:00 pm. For more information and to RSVP, please contact us at (805) 965-3443.

    New Nukes Are Nuts Merchandise

    Just in time for the holiday season, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has some new “Nukes Are Nuts” merchandise in stock and ready to ship. We have t-shirts for adults, onesies for babies, and reusable organic cotton tote bags for everyone.

    Be sure to check out the NAPF Peace Store for these and many other great gifts, including books on peace.

    For shipping outside of the United States, please contact rwayman@napf.org for a specific quote.

    Take Action

    No Unconstitutional Strike Against North Korea

    A bill in the House of Representatives seeks to stop an unconstitutional attack against North Korea. The bill, H.R. 4140, would prohibit the president from launching a first strike against North Korea without congressional approval. The bill also calls on the president to “initiate negotiations designed to achieve a diplomatic agreement to halt and eventually reverse North Korea’s nuclear and missile pursuits.”

    The bill currently has 61 co-sponsors, and more are urgently needed. Click here to take action.

    Quotes

    “Better than a thousand hollow words is one word that brings peace.”

    Buddha. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. Order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store for holiday gifts to the peace lovers in your life.

    “They like their nuclear weapons very much and don’t like it when we try to ban them.”

    Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, speaking about the protest of the U.S., UK, and France, which are sending only low-level diplomats to the December 10 Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.

    “We urge you to reject calls to develop new low-yield [nuclear] weapons or to increase nuclear delivery systems beyond those already planned, which are simply divorced from budgetary realities.”

    — A letter to Secretaries Tillerson, Mattis, and Perry from 15 U.S. senators.

    Editorial Team

     

    Joy Ferguson
    David Krieger
    Aidan Powers-Riggs
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

  • Open Letter to the President of Mexico

    On November 28, NAPF President David Krieger sent an open letter to the President of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, regarding the terrible situation faced by thousands of indigenous Mexican Tzotzil in the state of Chiapas.

    Dr. Krieger wrote, “We respectfully ask you to find an immediate solution in the case of the indigenous chiapanecos and avoid an even greater catastrophe.”

    To read the full letter in English, click here.

    Vaya aquí para la versión española.

  • Sunflower Newsletter: November 2017

    Issue #244 – November 2017

    Help us sustain the movement for peace and Nuclear Zero. Shop at our online store, choose NAPF as your charity of choice when checking out at smile.amazon.com, or ask your employer whether they can match your tax-deductible donation to NAPF. Please make a meaningful donation today and honor someone special in your life.

    Facebook Twitter Addthis

    • Perspectives
      • Nobel Peace Prize for ICAN’s Nuclear Weapon Ban Is Spot On by David Krieger
      • The Nuclear Dreams of President Donald Trump: Nightmares Past and Present by Rebecca Gordon
      • Rethinking the Three Rs by Brooke Takala
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • NATO Nuclear Weapon Exercises Take Place in Europe
      • Vice President Visits Nuclear Weapons Base
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • Setsuko Thurlow, Hiroshima Survivor and NAPF Advisor, to Jointly Accept Nobel Peace Prize
      • Nobel Foundation Stops Investing in Nuclear Weapon Producers
    • War and Peace
      • President Trump Refuses to Certify Iran’s Compliance with Nuclear Deal
      • Trump to Visit Asia in Early November
    • Nuclear Insanity
      • British Nuclear Submarine Crew Members Fired After Cocaine-Fueled Parties
      • Head of U.S. Nuclear Safety Agency Urges Trump to Abolish It
    • Nuclear “Modernization”
      • Congressional Budget Office Increases U.S. “Modernization” Cost Estimate
      • Video Shows Illegal Dumping of Toxic Liquid at Hanford
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • The Doomsday Machine: New Book by NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg
      • Study War No More
      • Sleepwalking to Armageddon
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF Brings Message of Peace to Middle School
      • Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World
      • Rick Wayman to Participate in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference
      • New Peace Poetry Book Now Available
    • Take Action
      • Cards for Humanity
      • Sign the People’s Peace Treaty with North Korea
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Nobel Peace Prize for ICAN’s Nuclear Weapon Ban Is Spot On

    The 2017 Nobel Peace Prize does not go to a politician or political leader. In fact, it does not single out any individual. Rather, it goes to a campaign, the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), composed of more than 450 civil society organizations in some 100 countries around the globe. It goes to a broad base of civil society organizations working in coalition to ban and eliminate nuclear weapons.

    In this sense, the award goes to the extraordinary people (“We, the People…”) throughout the world who have stepped up to end the threat to all humanity posed by the nearly 15,000 nuclear weapons still remaining on the planet.

    To read the full article at The Hill, click here.

    The Nuclear Dreams of President Donald Trump: Nightmares Past and Present

    Preventing a nuclear war between the United States and North Korea may be the most pressing challenge facing the world right now.

    Our childish, ignorant, and incompetent president is shoving all of us — especially the people of Asia — ever nearer to catastrophe. While North Korea probably hasn’t yet developed the missiles to deliver a nuclear warhead to the U.S. mainland, it certainly has the capacity to reach closer targets, including South Korea and Japan.

    But what can ordinary people do about it? Our fingers are far removed from the levers of power, while the tiny digits of the man occupying the “adult day care center” we call the White House hover dangerously close to what people my age used to call “the Button.” Nevertheless, I think there may still be time to put our collective foot on the brakes, beginning with the promise of a bill currently languishing in Congress.

    To read more, click here.

    Rethinking the Three Rs

    Until quite recently, ‘the 3 Rs’ simply meant reading, ‘riting, and ‘rithmatic. One could very well get by with basic competencies in literacy and math.

    The shift we see through acceptance of a total and legally binding ban on nuclear weapons is, at its core, an ideological and philosophical one. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is a milestone in the ongoing reframing of global security concepts. While some may see the ban treaty as a stand against nuclear weapons states, we can also understand the action as taking a stand for peace by legally de-legitimizing weapons of mass destruction.

    However, reframing is directly linked to access to knowledge. The less we know, the less we question what is acceptable. The more we know the more action we are likely to take when the human consequences of the nuclear cycle are recognized. Hence, the 3 Rs of Human Security embedded in the nuclear ban treaty: Recognition, Restitution, and Remediation.

    To read more, click here.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    NATO Nuclear Weapons Exercises Take Place in Europe

    On October 16, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) began its annual nuclear weapons exercises. The “Steadfast Noon” exercises took place at two bases where the United States deploys nuclear weapons: Kleine Brogel in Belgium and Büchel in Germany.

    The U.S. currently deploys approximately 180 nuclear weapons in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey.

    Julian E. Barnes, “NATO Launches Its Main Nuclear Drill, Showcasing Its Defenses,” Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2017.

    Vice President Visits Nuclear Weapons Base

    U.S. Vice President Mike Pence visited the Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota on October 27, telling the airmen to “stay sharp” and “be ready” in the face of what he called an increasing threat from North Korea. Minot AFB hosts 26 B-52 nuclear-armed bomber aircraft and commands 150 Minuteman III nuclear-armed Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles.

    The U.S. nuclear weapons at Minot AFB alone are capable of indiscriminately killing hundreds of millions of people. Despite this, Pence said, “There’s no greater element of American strength, there’s no greater force for peace in the world than the United States nuclear arsenal.”

    Julia Manchester, “Pence to Military on North Korea: ‘Be Ready’,” The Hill, October 28, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    Setsuko Thurlow, Hiroshima Survivor and NAPF Advisor, to Jointly Accept Nobel Peace Prize

    Setsuko Thurlow, who was 13 years old when she survived the United States’ atomic bombing of Hiroshima, will jointly accept the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize on December 10 with Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). Thurlow said, “Survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are living witnesses to the horror of nuclear war. They have played a central role in ICAN. World leaders must heed their call for a nuclear-weapon-free future.”

    Setsuko Thurlow has dedicated her life to campaigning for the abolition of nuclear weapons. In 2015, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation gave her its Distinguished Peace Leadership Award, and she has continued her involvement with NAPF as a member of the Advisory Council.

    Atomic Bomb Survivor to Jointly Accept Nobel Peace Prize on ICAN’s Behalf,” International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, October 26, 2017.

    Nobel Foundation Stops Investing in Nuclear Weapon Producers

    Just weeks after awarding the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), the Nobel Foundation has announced that it is implementing a policy to no longer invest in companies that are involved in the production of nuclear weapons.

    “One can discuss that we should have done that earlier, but we sharpened our standards in March and we are now following through with it,” said Nobel Foundation director Lars Heikensten. “At the latest, by March next year we will have no investment in anything that is connected with any kind of production which is classified as connected with nuclear weapons,” he said.

    Nobel Prize Money Will No Longer be ‘Invested” in Nuclear Weapons,” Agence France Presse, October 27, 2017.

    War and Peace

    President Trump Refuses to Certify Iran’s Compliance with Nuclear Deal

    U.S. President Donald Trump refused to certify that Iran is acting in compliance with its obligations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly referred to as the Iran Nuclear Deal. Congress requires that the U.S. President certify Iran’s compliance every 90 days. By refusing to certify, Trump has set the stage for Congress to re-impose economic sanctions against Iran, which would put the U.S. in violation of the deal.

    “President Trump’s rejection of the JCPOA is an incitement to proliferation, makes achieving further agreements to rein in the nuclear threat more difficult, and increases global risk of nuclear use,” the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) said in a statement.

    Nobel Peace Laureates Denounce Trump’s Iran Move,” Agence France Presse, October 13, 2017.

    Trump to Visit Asia in Early November

    U.S. President Donald Trump is scheduled to visit several Asian countries in early November. He is scheduled to visit China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Japan, and South Korea over a one-week period. President Trump has chosen not to visit the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea.

    The U.S. has continued to prepare for war with North Korea. According to Christine Ahn, Executive Director of Women Cross DMZ, “The U.S. has sent three nuclear aircraft carriers to be docked on the Korean Peninsula. They have been conducting very provocative joint war exercises with South Korea, including Navy SEALs that took out Osama bin Laden. They do include the decapitation strikes. And so, it’s one thing to say, ‘We don’t want war with North Korea,’ and another to actually be laying the grounds for that.”

    Trump Admin Continues Threats and Provocations Against North Korea, Laying Groundwork for Nuclear War,” Democracy Now, October 30, 2017.

    Nuclear Insanity

    British Nuclear Submarine Crew Members Fired After Cocaine-Fueled Parties

    Numerous sailors from the British Royal Navy’s nuclear-armed submarine HMS Vigilant have been fired after testing positive for cocaine. While the submarine was docked in Kings Bay, Georgia, to pick up nuclear weapons, sailors reportedly had out-of-control parties at a local hotel.

    The incident occurred in September at a time of heightened nuclear tensions, when U.S. President Donald Trump threatened at the United Nations to “totally destroy” North Korea, and Kim Jong-un called Trump a “mentally deranged U.S. dotard” who will “pay dearly” for his UN speech.

    Cleve R. Wootson Jr., “Nuclear Sub Sailors Fired After ‘Absolutely Disgraceful’ Parties with a Prostitute and Cocaine,” Washington Post, October 28, 2017.

    Head of Nuclear Safety Agency Urges Trump to Abolish It

    Sean Sullivan, chairman of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB), told the director of the Office of Management and Budget in a private letter that closing or shrinking the panel he chairs is consistent with President Trump’s ambition to cut the size of the federal workforce. DNFSB, chartered by Congress, has helped persuade the federal government to impose tighter safety rules and regulations at most of the eight nuclear weapons sites — employing more than 40,000 workers — where nuclear weapons and their parts are produced or stored.

    Patrick Malone, “GOP Chair of Nuclear Safety Agency Secretly Urges Trump to Abolish It,” Center for Public Integrity, October 19, 2017.

    Nuclear “Modernization”

    Congressional Budget Office Increases U.S. “Modernization” Cost Estimate

    On October 31, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published a report that increases the estimated 30-year cost of “modernizing” the U.S. nuclear arsenal and production facilities to $1.24 trillion. The CBO report examines some options to eliminate some of the costs or delay them.

    This estimate is $242 billion higher than the already-outrageous $1 trillion figure that has been widely cited since the Obama administration began its plans for a 30-year nuclear weapons spending binge.

    Approaches for Managing the Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2017 to 2046,” Congressional Budget Office, October 31, 2017.

    Video Shows Illegal Dumping of Toxic Liquid at Hanford

    Video taken in August 2017 shows contractors at the Hanford Site in Washington State illegally dumping rainwater from large metal containers containing radioactive waste. Hanford, which is the most contaminated site in the Western Hemisphere, was used primarily to produce plutonium for U.S. nuclear weapons from the mid-1940s to the mid-1980s.

    The workers dumping this liquid were employed by Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), a private contractor managing tens of millions of gallons of highly-radioactive waste at Hanford. WRPS officials have denied that they did anything wrong. However, state Representative Gerry Pollet said, “Of course it’s illegal to dump any liquid waste. This is the kind of thing that caused Hanford to be the most contaminated place in the Western Hemisphere in the first place. I am shocked to see something like this in 2017. It’s outrageous.”

    Despite the United States’ inability to properly deal with the huge amount of radioactive waste it has created through decades of past nuclear weapons development, the Trump administration has indicated that it favors renewed production of nuclear weapons and components.

    Susannah Frame, “Video Shows Illegal Dumping of Toxic Liquids at Hanford,” KING 5, October 27, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of November, including the November 28, 1993 arrest of a group of Russians who attempted to sell 4.5 kilograms of highly-enriched uranium to undercover buyers.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    The Doomsday Machine: New Book by NAPF Distinguished Fellow Daniel Ellsberg

    The Doomsday Machine, a new book by NAPF Fellow Daniel Ellsberg, is now available for pre-order. It will be released on December 5. Ellsberg, the legendary whistleblower who revealed the Pentagon Papers, was a presidential advisor and nuclear strategist. The Doomsday Machine is Ellsberg’s hair-raising account of the most dangerous arms build-up in the history of civilization, whose legacy – and proposed renewal under the Trump administration – threatens the very survival of humanity.

    To pre-order the book from Amazon, click here.

    Study War No More

    Join the Global Campaign for Peace Education and World Beyond War in this timely discussion on “Debunking the Myths of War” by participating in discussion 3 of the online study guide Study War No More. This discussion features an introductory video by Study and Action Partner Paul K. Chappell, the Peace Leadership Director of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.

    The goals and objectives of this discussion are to identify, reflect and analyze assumptions of war, violence and conflict.

    Study War No More provides guided inquiries and suggests practical actions for students and citizens to understand the nature of “the war system” and the possibilities for its transformation to an authentic “global security system” pursued via peaceful means.

    Click here to learn more and participate.

    Sleepwalking to Armageddon

    A new book edited by Dr. Helen Caldicott, Sleepwalking to Armageddon, is now available. For this book, Dr. Caldicott assembled some of the world’s leading nuclear scientists and thought leaders to assess the scientific and political dimensions of the threat of nuclear war today. NAPF President David Krieger wrote a chapter for the book. It also includes a chapter by NAPF Advisory Council member Noam Chomsky.

    Click here to order a copy of the book.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF Brings Message of Peace to Middle School

    NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell has partnered with the Santa Barbara Middle School for a six-month peace education effort. The partnership is part of NAPF’s newly-launched Peace Literacy Initiative, in which Chappell worked with a team of educators around the United States and Canada to develop free curriculum for grades 4-12 and college.

    Whitney Ingersoll, director of admission at Santa Barbara Middle School, said, “He speaks from the heart, and his message speaks to archetypal mindsets of what it means to be human. He clearly explained how we can better understand ourselves and others, in order to communicate and live more peacefully, inside and out.”

    Over the next few months, Paul will conduct workshops with students, teachers, and parents at the school. The school’s intent is to foster a more peaceful and compassionate way to be in the world within oneself, at home, and as a school community.

    To read more about this initiative, click here.

    Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 34th Annual Evening for Peace took place on October 22, in Santa Barbara, California. The theme of this year’s event was “A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World.” The Foundation honored Dr. Ira Helfand and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with its Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    Audio and video of Dr. Helfand’s chilling and inspiring acceptance speech are available here to download from our Evening for Peace page. A written transcript and photos will be available soon.

    Rick Wayman to Participate in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference

    Rick Wayman, NAPF’s Director of Programs, will participate in a nuclear disarmament conference at the Vatican on November 10-11. The conference, entitled “Perspectives for a World Free from Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament,” will feature an audience with Pope Francis, as well as talks by UN Secretary-General António Guterres and many Nobel Peace Laureates.

    Information on conference outcomes will be published in the December issue of The Sunflower.

    New Peace Poetry Book Now Available

    Portraits: Peacemakers, Warmongers and People Between is a new book of original peace poetry by NAPF President David Krieger. Commenting on the new book, Archbishop Desmond Tutu said, “Poetry that awakens our deepest humanity. Each poem leaves me wanting another.”

    To order a copy of this new book, click here.

    Take Action

    Cards for Humanity

    S.200, a bill currently before the senate, calls for restrictions on the President’s ability to use nuclear weapons first.

    Buy a $1 postcard as part of our Cards for Humanity campaign and we will send it to the Senator of your choice. We’ll sign your name on the postcard, stamp it, and mail it to your Senator’s office in DC.

    Click here to view the postcard and choose your Senators.

    Sign the People’s Peace Treaty with North Korea

    Alarmed by the threat of a nuclear war between the U.S. and North Korea, concerned U.S. peace groups, including the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, have come together to send an open message to Washington and Pyongyang that we are strongly opposed to any resumption of the horrific Korean War. What we want is a peace treaty to finally end the lingering Korean War!

    Inspired by the Vietnam-era People’s Peace Treaty, we have initiated a People’s Peace Treaty with North Korea, to raise awareness about the past U.S. policy toward North Korea, and to send a clear message that we, the people of the U.S., do not want another war with North Korea. This is not an actual treaty, but rather a declaration of peace from the people of the United States.

    To read the full text and add your name, click here.

    Quotes

     

    “Nuclear disarmament is not an option for governments to take up or ignore. It is a moral duty owed by them to their own citizens, and to humanity as a whole. We must not await another Hiroshima or Nagasaki before finally mustering the political will to banish these weapons from global arsenals.”

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The revised 4th edition of this book has just been published. Order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store at a 25% discount.

     

    “I refuse to have an enemy.”

    Sister Ardeth Platte, a Dominican nun who, together with Sr. Carol Gilbert, returned to a Minuteman III ICBM silo, 15 years after their arrest there, to deliver a copy of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

     

    “So maybe we make a drastic change. We go back to [nuclear] testing.”

    Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), chair of the House Armed Services Committee, suggesting that the United States resume full-scale nuclear weapons testing.

     

    “Some issues are not about left and right, Republican and Democrat – they’re about our deepest moral values. And we believe that you have to have a campaign, a movement, that seeks to reshape the moral narrative.”

    Rev. Dr. William Barber, a leader of the new Poor People’s Campaign, a non-violent movement to end systemic racism, poverty, militarism, environmental destruction and related injustices, and to build a just, sustainable and participatory society.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • 2017 Evening for Peace: October 22, 2017

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation hosted its 34th Annual Evening for Peace on October 22, 2017 in Santa Barbara, California. The Foundation honored Dr. Ira Helfand and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with the 2017 Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    Dr. Ira Helfand, MD, is co-President of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), and a co-Founder and past President of Physicians for Social Responsibility, IPPNW’s U.S. affiliate. He has published studies on the medical consequences of nuclear war in the New England Journal of Medicine, the British Medial Journal, and the World Medical Journal, and has lectured globally on the health effects of nuclear weapons. In April 2012, he presented IPPNW’s report, Nuclear Famine: One Billion People at Risk, at the Nobel Peace Laureates Summit. When he’s not writing, speaking, listening, learning, and fundraising for nuclear abolition, he practices as an internist and urgent care physician.

    IPPNW was founded in 1980 by U.S. and Soviet physicians who shared a commitment to the prevention of nuclear war, citing that doctors have an obligation to prevent what they cannot treat. IPPNW was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985. This year, IPPNW played an instrumental role at the United Nations Conference to negotiate a Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. For over 37 years, IPPNW has been practicing peace.

    Click here for a MP3 audio recording of Dr. Helfand’s acceptance speech, or here for a written transcript. Photos of the event are available here. You can also watch it on video below.

    HONORARY COMMITTEE

    Felix Aguilar, M.D., MPH
    Ben Broder, M.D., Ph.D.
    Steven Charles
    Robert F. Dodge, M.D.
    Chuck Genuardi, MSN
    Gilberto Granados, M.D., MPH
    Jimmy H. Hara, M.D.
    Judith Lipton, M.D.
    Diane Meyer Simon
    Deborah Prothrow-Stith, M.D.
    Jyoti Puvvula, M.D., MPH
    Jose Quiroga, M.D.
    Mara K. Sweeney, M.D.
    Takashi Wada, M.D., MPH
    Lisa Wysel

    DINNER COMMITTEE

    Jill Dexter, Chair
    Suzan Garner
    Sherry Melchiorre
    Anne Schowe
    Christina Schowe

    THANK YOU TO OUR LEAD SPONSORS

    Jill and Ron Dexter
    Sarah and Chuck Genuardi
    Jamal and Saida Hamdani
    Diane Meyer Simon
    Daniel Smith and Lucy Lee
    Lisa Wysel and Dr. Glen Wysel

    Student Table Sponsors

    Fielding Graduate University
    Sue Hawes
    Diane Meyer Simon
    Maryan Schall

    Partners in Peace

    Janna and Chuck Abraham
    Gary Atkins Sound Systems
    Boone Printing & Graphics
    Rick Carter Photography
    Gretchen Lieff and Lieff Wines
    Hal Maynard and Sandy Jones
    George Quirin
    Sculpterra Winery and Sculpture Garden

  • Sunflower Newsletter: October 2017

    Issue #243 – October 2017

    Rick Wayman, our Director of Programs, has been invited to take part in a conference at the Vatican in November. This important gathering will include Pope Francis, UN Secretary-General António Guterres, and Nobel Peace Laureates. This is an exciting opportunity for the Foundation, but it’s not in our 2017 budget.

    Will you help us raise $2,000 to get Rick to the Vatican?

    Please donate here. Thank you!

    P.S.: All contributors will receive exclusive email updates directly from Rick about the conference and potential actions arising from the gathering.

    Donate Now

    • Perspectives
      • The Reality of the Nuclear Age by David Krieger
      • Letter to UN Secretary-General by Women Cross DMZ
      • The North Korea Standoff Is Now as Bad as the Cuban Missile Crisis by Daryl Kimball
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • New Nuclear Posture Review Faces Delays
      • Trump Threatens to Totally Destroy North Korea
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Opens for Signature
      • First U.S. Bank Announces Policy Against Funding Nuclear Weapons
    • War and Peace
      • How Many People Would Die in a War with North Korea?
      • “The Man Who Saved the World” Dies at 77
    • Nuclear Modernization
      • U.S. Navy Awards $5.1 Billion Contract for New Nuclear-Armed Submarine Development
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • SIPRI Yearbook Published
      • Britain’s H-Bomb Tests in the Pacific
    • Foundation Activities
      • A Teacher’s Guide to Peace Literacy
      • Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World
      • NAPF Invited to Participate in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference
      • Poetry Contest Winners Announced
    • Take Action
      • No Money for New Nuclear Weapons or Testing
      • Restricting the First Use of Nuclear Weapons
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    The Reality of the Nuclear Age

    Anyone with a modicum of sense does not want to see the U.S. teeter at the brink of war with North Korea and certainly not inadvertently stumble over that brink, or intentionally jump. The first Korean War in the 1950s was costly in terms of lives and treasure. A second Korean War, with the possibility of nuclear weapons use, would be far more costly to both sides, and could lead to global nuclear conflagration.

    Neither North Korea nor South Korea want a new war, but U.S. leadership in Washington is threatening war, with remarks such as “talking is not the answer”; North Korean threats “will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen”; “military solutions are now in place, locked and loaded”; and “all options are on the table.” Such posturing has only elicited more nuclear and missile tests from North Korea.

    To read more, click here.

    Letter to UN Secretary-General

    In his first General Assembly address, President Trump threatened “to totally destroy North Korea” if the United States or its allies were attacked. As the world’s greatest military power, the United States is the only nation ever to use atomic bombs against a civilian population that annihilated a quarter million people in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. We call on you, as Secretary-General of the United Nations, to counsel in the strongest of terms, the President of the United States and its Ambassador to the UN, that threats to destroy another country are unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the community of nations.

    We must work to abolish nuclear weapons worldwide, including in India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, and among all Permanent Members of the Security Council. We oppose North Korea’s increased militarization, including testing missiles and nuclear weapons, and threats to retaliate against the United States, its allies, and its territories where significant U.S. military bases are located. However, we understand North Korea’s fears of a U.S. pre-emptive strike. There is still no Peace Treaty ending the Korean War, during which the United States carpet-bombed 85 percent of North Korea. From 1950-53, four million people were killed, including a quarter of the North Korean population.

    To read more, click here.

    The North Korea Standoff Is Now as Bad as the Cuban Missile Crisis

    The nuclear danger posed by North Korea is not new. For more than a decade, the Kim regime has possessed nuclear weapons and has been steadily pursuing the capability to develop compact warheads and longer-range missile systems.

    But since the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, a bad situation has become far worse. North Korea has accelerated its missile testing and Trump has vowed a military attack against North Korea if it threatens the U.S. or its allies.

    The risk of conflict through miscalculation by either side is now as severe as the tense days of October 1962, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union nearly went to war over the deployment of Soviet missiles in Cuba. Just as was the case in 1962, even a small action or wrong word could lead to war.

    To read more, click here.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    New Nuclear Posture Review Faces Delays

    A self-imposed deadline of December 2017 is likely to be missed as staffing shortages at the State Department and Pentagon slow down work on the Trump administration’s Nuclear Posture Review (NPR).

    Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Michelle Baldanza said that the NPR “will guide modernization efforts and establish U.S. nuclear deterrence policy, strategy, and posture for the next 5-10 years.” As part of the review, the Trump administration is also considering smaller, more tactical nuclear weapons that would cause less destruction than the current U.S. stockpile.

    Paul McLeary, “With Pentagon, State Positions Vacant, Trump Nuclear Review Slows Down,” Foreign Policy, September 15, 2017.

    Trump Threatens to Totally Destroy North Korea

    On September 19 in a speech at the United Nations, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea, a UN member state with a population of 25 million. He said, “The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.”

    Article 2(4) of the UN Charter states, “All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”

    Jon Schwarz, “Donald Trump Used the United Nations to Threaten a Massive Violation of International Law,” The Intercept, September 20, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Opens for Signature

    On September 20, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons opened for signature at the United Nations in New York. Fifty nations signed the treaty on the first day. Many more are expected to sign in the coming weeks.

    The treaty prohibits nations from “undertaking to develop, test, produce, manufacture, acquire, possess or stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, as well as the use or threat of use of these weapons,” according to a U.N. press release.

    James Dearie, “Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Opens for Signature,” National Catholic Reporter, September 26, 2017.

    First U.S. Bank Announces Policy Against Funding Nuclear Weapons

    On September 20, New York-based Amalgamated Bank made an official statement against investing in nuclear weapons production. It is the first U.S. bank to do so, and the statement was the bank’s first public announcement on investment policy regarding weapons of any kind. The announcement coincided with the signing ceremony at the UN for the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

    First U.S. Bank Announces Public Position Against Nuclear Weapons,” ICAN, September 21, 2017.

    War and Peace

    How Many People Would Die in a War with North Korea?

    House Reps. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) have asked Defense Secretary James Mattis for estimated casualty totals in the event of war with North Korea. In the wake of the North Korean foreign minister’s statement that President Trump has made a “declaration of war,” the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees want to check the President’s unilateral dealings with North Korea, and have these casualty counts included in their briefings on the situation.

    Congressman Lieu writes, “To be clear, we believe it is wrong to use military force without first exhausting all other options, including diplomacy. We also believe it would be unconstitutional for the administration to start a war with North Korea without congressional authorization.”

    Defense Secretary James Mattis has said that war with North Korea would be “catastrophic” and that he has looked at military options that he claims would not put Seoul at risk.

    Rebecca Kheel, “Dems Ask Mattis: How Many People Would Die in War with North Korea?The Hill, September 26, 2017.

    “The Man Who Saved the World” Dies at 77

    On May 19, Stanislav Petrov, a Soviet lieutenant colonel for the Air Defense Forces during the Cold War, died at age 77 at his home in a suburb of Moscow. Petrov was the key actor in preventing the outbreak of an all-out nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR in 1983, when a Soviet system incorrectly signaled that the U.S. had launched 5 nuclear-armed ICBMs towards the Soviet Union.

    Petrov’s job was to monitor this system and send the message up the chain of command if an attack was impending. However, when the system alarms went off on September 26, 1983, he correctly suspected it was a system malfunction and did not relay the message up the command chain. Had Petrov not had the composure and intuition to check for malfunctioning software, it is likely that this false alarm would have led to a Soviet counter-attack on the U.S., and ultimately to nuclear war.

    Greg Myre, “Stanislav Petrov, ‘The Man Who Saved The World,’ Dies At 77,” NPR, September 18, 2017.

    Nuclear Modernization

    U.S. Navy Awards $5.1 Billion Contract for New Nuclear-Armed Submarine Development

    The U.S. Navy has awarded a $5.1 billion contract to General Dynamics Electric Boat. The contract is for the design, completion, component and technology development and prototyping efforts for the Columbia Class Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs).  The work will also include United Kingdom unique efforts related to the Common Missile Compartment.

    The U.S. plans to build 12 new Columbia-Class Submarines, each with 16 missile tubes, and the UK plans to build four nuclear-armed ballistic submarines, each with 12 missile tubes.

    The nuclear-armed submarines are expected to remain in service through at least the 2070s.

    Navy $5 Billion Deal Builds New Nuclear-Armed Columbia-Class Sub,” Scout, September 21, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of October, including the October 6, 1986 sinking of the Soviet K-219 nuclear-armed submarine in the Atlantic Ocean.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    SIPRI Yearbook Published

    The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), a leading independent research institute on conflict, arms control and disarmament, has published its 2017 yearbook.

    According to SIPRI, global inventories of nuclear weapons continue to decline in number due to reductions made by the U.S. and Russia. However, “both the USA and Russia have extensive and expensive programs under way to replace and modernize their nuclear warheads, missile and aircraft delivery systems, and nuclear weapon production facilities,” and China, India, North Korea and Pakistan are thought to be expanding the size of their nuclear arsenals. In addition, SIPRI reports that there is inadequate transparency in the reporting of nuclear arsenal size and capability from most nuclear states, particularly Russia, China, North Korea, India, and Pakistan.

    For more information on this year’s SIPRI report, click here.

    Britain’s H-Bomb Tests in the Pacific

    Grappling with the Bomb is a history of Britain’s 1950s program to test the hydrogen bomb, code name Operation Grapple. In 1957–58, nine atmospheric nuclear tests were held at Malden Island and Christmas Island in the British Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony — today, part of the Pacific nation of Kiribati.

    Nearly 14,000 British troops travelled to the central Pacific for Operation Grapple. They were joined by hundreds of New Zealand sailors, Gilbertese laborers and Fijian troops. Today, decades later, survivors suffer from serious illnesses they attribute to exposure to hazardous levels of ionizing radiation.

    On the 60th anniversary of the tests, Nic Maclellan’s book details regional opposition to Britain’s testing program in the 1950s, with protests from Fiji, Cook Islands, Western Samoa, Japan and other nations.

    You can purchase a copy or download a free e-book from the ANU Press website.

    Foundation Activities

    A Teacher’s Guide to Peace Literacy

    Peace literacy is an idea created by NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell, a West Point graduate, former Army captain, and Iraq war veteran who grew up in a violent household and struggled with trauma throughout his school years. Realizing that humanity is facing new challenges that require us to become as well-trained in waging peace as soldiers are in waging war, he created peace literacy to help students and adults from various backgrounds work toward their full potential and a more peaceful world.

    Peace literacy frames peace not merely as a goal, but as a practical skill-set that allows us to increase realistic peace in our lives, communities, nations, and the world. Peace literacy also helps us fully develop our human capacity for empathy, conscience, and reason.

    To read more about this movement, click here.

    Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 34th Annual Evening for Peace will take place on Sunday, October 22, in Santa Barbara, California. The theme of this year’s event is “A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World.” The Foundation will honor Dr. Ira Helfand and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with its Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    For more information, including sponsorship opportunities and tickets, click here.

    NAPF Invited to Participate in Vatican Nuclear Disarmament Conference

    Rick Wayman, NAPF’s Director of Programs, will participate in a nuclear disarmament conference at the Vatican on November 10-11. The conference, entitled “Perspectives for a World Free from Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament,” will feature an audience with Pope Francis, as well as talks by UN Secretary-General António Guterres and many Nobel Peace Laureates.

    More information will be published in the December issue of The Sunflower. This trip would not be possible without the generous support of our worldwide NAPF family. To support the costs of this important opportunity, click here.

    Poetry Contest Winners Announced

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has announced the winners of its 2017 Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards. Nearly 200 people entered the contest, submitting original poems illuminating their positive visions of peace.

    The winning poem in the adult category is entitled “Manchester,” by Nicole Melanson. To read all of the winning poems, click here. For more information about the contest, click here.

    Take Action

    No Money for New Nuclear Weapons or Testing

    The United States detonated 1,032 nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere, under the ocean, and underground between 1945 and 1992 that devastated local communities. Though the U.S. has not conducted a full-scale underground nuclear test in 25 years, resurgent nuclear threats are gaining intensity in the Trump administration. Neocons, nuclear lab managers, and others are urging Trump to hit the accelerator on new nuclear warheads and the underground explosions needed to test them.

    Public pressure from ordinary Americans was essential in halting explosive U.S. nuclear testing in the atmosphere and underground 25 years ago. We must act now to halt funding for a new arms race.

    Join us as we urge White House Budget Office Director, Mick Mulvaney, and the Armed Services and Appropriations Committees of the U.S. Congress not to fund programs that may lead to resumption of nuclear test explosions or new nuclear weapons. Click here to take action.

    Prevent the First Use of Nuclear Weapons

    At the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, we are working tirelessly not only for the complete abolition of nuclear weapons, but also in the meantime to ensure that nuclear weapons are never used. The humanitarian consequences of any nuclear weapons use would be unacceptable. The conflict between the United States and North Korea gives new urgency to bills currently in the House and Senate.

    Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) have introduced bills in the House and Senate to reduce the likelihood of the United States using nuclear weapons first in a conflict. The bills would prohibit the President of the United States from launching a nuclear first strike without an explicit declaration by Congress.

    Of course, we believe strongly that nuclear weapons should never be used under any circumstances. This bill would not legislate that, but it would make it much more difficult for the President to use nuclear weapons, which we believe is a move in the right direction.

    Please write your Representative and Senators today and ask them to sign on to H.R. 669 in the House or S.200 in the Senate. Click here to take action.

    Quotes

     

    “There is no time left for anything but to make peacework a dimension of our every waking activity.”

    Elise Boulding. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The revised 4th edition of this book has just been published. Order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store at a 25% discount.

     

    “Together with China we’ll continue to strive for a reasonable approach and not an emotional one like when children in a kindergarten start fighting and no one can stop them.”

    Sergei Lavrov, Foreign Minister of Russia. Lavrov was referring to a proposal supported by Russia and China that would involve North Korea freezing its nuclear and missile programs in exchange for a halt to joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises.

     

    “Let us commit ourselves to a world without nuclear weapons by implementing the Non-Proliferation Treaty to abolish these weapons of death.”

    — A tweet by Pope Francis on September 26, the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.

     

    “Our federations, representing millions of doctors, nurses, and public health professionals around the world, welcome this treaty as a significant forward step toward eliminating the most destructive weapons ever created, and the existential threat nuclear war poses to humanity and to the survival of all life on Earth.”

    Joint statement by the World Medical Association, International Council of Nurses, World Federation of Public Health Associations, and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. The statement urges all countries to quickly sign and ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

    Editorial Team

     

    Joy Ferguson
    David Krieger
    Aidan Powers-Riggs
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

     

  • 2017 Winning Poems

    These are the winning poems of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 2017 Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Awards. For more information on this annual peace poetry contest, and to read the winning poems from previous years, click here.

    First Place Adult
    Nicole Melanson

    Manchester

    They went to hear music.
    The lucky ones came home
    missing only friends.

    Raising children in this world
    is like running upstairs
    with a glass of water
    clutched under your arm.

    I have five sons.
    They are frogs and snails
    and feathers dipped in gold.

    They are blueberry eyes
    and backs that curve to the palm
    like soap.

    They are the longest breath
    I’ve ever held.

    Sweat cools on my brow
    as they sleep. This
    is what passes for peace
    to a parent—

    a slackening jaw,
    the heart unclenching

    each night
    every child comes home.

     

    Honorable Mention Adult
    Andrea Livingston

    Paper Cranes

    Let us now find the courage, together,
    to spread peace and pursue a world
    without nuclear weapons.

    Barack Obama, the first sitting president to visit Hiroshima,
    May 27, 2016

    Wanting to make it right,
    President Obama read the instructions carefully.
    Take a square piece of Japanese paper,
    one with flowers, or maybe apricots, cherries,
    fold it from top to bottom, crease and open,
    then fold in half sideways.

    That day at Hiroshima,
    the president gave his handmade paper cranes
    to two schoolchildren, a symbol of peace
    so simple, yet years in the making,
    as if he wanted to promise
    these tallest of birds would forever soar
    above their city, their wings stretching
    into the clearest center of sky.

    Six decades ago,
    12-year-old Sadako Sasaki,
    her bones slowly disintegrating
    from “A-bomb disease,” carefully folded
    medicine labels, faded scraps of wrapping paper
    into a thousand cranes, as if to ask the gods
    that in return for her ancient offering,
    they would make the world well again.

     

    First Place Youth 13-18
    Ana K. Lair

    Before the War

    We never stayed at home.

    We were eleven, bony and wild,
    we sat and carved sticks with our teeth,

    still for an instant as dusk fled,
    then bolting off again, hungry for more chaos, more dirt,

    face paint and saliva.
    We tasted metal, ate bone.

    Smiles greasy with lying,
    our brothers told us a birch tree was a ghost’s hand.

    We slid past, its bent white claws
    screeching down the belly of our canoe.

    I’m sorry we don’t speak anymore,
    the day the telephone stopped announcing

    the other’s need, in its shrill metallic call.
    But no need for talk of that now.

    When I walk back through the autumn woods
    with leaves like raw meat in the cold,

    I see your teeth marks on the birch,
    I hear you crashing ahead through pine, howling mammal cry,

    feet flashing up like the warning of a deer’s tail
    as you caught the very first scent
    of our parents calling us home.

     

    Honorable Mention Youth 13 – 18
    Ella Cowan de Wolf

    The Numbers

    You suddenly see a set of random numbers, such as 374251. What comes to mind?

    I think of science, I think of math.
    I think of “old school” clocks and petals on a daisy gifted by a lover of poetry.
    I think that 3.14 is the start of a number so simple that it has cracked the minds of countless
    mathematicians yet is engraved into the minds of children before they can count to 100 in a
    different language.
    I think that 143, “I love you” flows so easily off the tongue of a 7 year old child with 3 less teeth
    than she wants, telling her 2 parents that she sees the world through looking glasses covered in
    blue waves of her own imagination.
    I think that it only took 4,224 pages and 7 books to redefine my entire childhood to believe that
    magic was granted to those who were chosen and that the boy with the lightning scar was too old
    to think about as I wrapped my head around the next 1,155 pages of a 3 part series of a girl on
    fire. This was my childhood.
    But now, I think of an old joke which makes the wrinkles of my smile shine bright as 4 is
    considered a study group, but 5 is a party. Yet, I wonder that it takes 2 to make a pair which is
    only 1 away from being lonely…
    And I know now that in 374,251 seconds I will be 4.332 days older than I am in existence at this
    moment in time, so I am going to become someone I am proud to show the world.
    Numbers define the essence of society itself, and with each new member I am reminded how
    small I am, how I am 1 in 7.125 billion, a large, never ending, form of 3.14, a number to confuse
    the greatest minds in the century, but then it dawns on me…it only takes 1 to make a difference.

     

    First Place Youth 12 and Under
    Kendall Cooper

    Colorblind

    I am colorblind, can’t you see, I can’t see you and you can’t see me,
    I see no black, no white, nor yellow, I see no harsh and see no mellow,
    I see no sick or healthy, and no poor or wealthy.
    I see no religion or race, no pretty or out of place.
    No skinny or fat, no I-don’t-like-that!
    I see faces, so many faces around the globe from different places.
    I see life, so many lives, like plants that grow and plants that thrive.
    I see sound, sweet music, as the rhythm is abundant in the world of human.
    I see touch, people touching the hearts of others.
    I see smiles, so many smiles, the ones that go on for miles and miles.
    I see laughter, curiosity having fun with the tips of grins,
    the laughs that brighten a day filled with grim.
    I see light, warmth, and a touch of love shining through cracks
    of a broken melody of color.

  • Sunflower Newsletter: September 2017

     

    Issue #242 – September 2017

    Please join our Peace Literacy Movement and help us offer a free curriculum that people can use to spread peace literacy in their schools and communities.
    Donate Now
    Facebook Twitter Addthis
    • Perspectives
      • What Factors Make Nuclear War More Likely? by David Krieger
      • 2017 Hiroshima Peace Declaration by Mayor Kazumi Matsui
      • Can the World Come to Its Senses on Nuclear Weapons? by Bunny McDiarmid
    • Obituary
      • Remembering Tony de Brum
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • President Trump Threatens “Fire and Fury” Against North Korea
      • U.S. Warns Sweden Not to Sign Nuclear Ban Treaty
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • German Candidate Pledges to Remove U.S. Nuclear Weapons from German Soil
    • War and Peace
      • North Korea Fires Missile Over Japan
      • White House Pressuring Intelligence Officials to Find Iran in Non-Compliance with Nuclear Deal
    • Nuclear Modernization
      • U.S. Awards Contracts for Nuclear “Modernization” Programs
      • U.S. Conducts Additional Tests of New B61-12 Nuclear Bomb
    • Nuclear Energy and Waste
      • Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Bank Opens in Kazakhstan
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Nuclear Close Calls
    • Foundation Activities
      • New Books Now Available
      • Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World
      • Peace Literacy Moves Forward
      • Letter in The New York Times
    • Take Action
      • Sign the Open Letter to Congress: Act to Prevent Nuclear Catastrophe
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    What Factors Make Nuclear War More Likely?

    We know that the risk of nuclear war is not zero. Humans are not capable of creating foolproof systems. Nuclear weapons systems are particularly problematic since the possession of nuclear weapons carries an implicit threat of use under certain circumstances. In accord with nuclear deterrence theory, a country threatens to use nuclear weapons, believing that it will prevent the use of nuclear weapons against it.

    Nearly 15,000 nuclear weapons are currently under the control of nine countries. Each has a complex system of command and control with many possibilities for error, accident or intentional use.

    Given the catastrophic consequences of nuclear war, including destruction of civilization and human extinction, identifying and eliminating the factors making nuclear war likely or even possible is imperative. There are simply too many possibilities for failure in such a complex system of interactions.

    To read more, click here.

    2017 Hiroshima Peace Declaration

    On August 6, at 8:15 a.m., absolute evil was unleashed in the sky over Hiroshima. Let’s imagine for a moment what happened under that roiling mushroom cloud. Pika—the penetrating flash, extreme radiation and heat. Don—the earth-shattering roar and blast. As the blackness lifts, the scenes emerging into view reveal countless scattered corpses charred beyond recognition even as man or woman. Stepping between the corpses, badly burned, nearly naked figures with blackened faces, singed hair, and tattered, dangling skin wander through spreading flames, looking for water. The rivers in front of you are filled with bodies; the riverbanks so crowded with burnt, half-naked victims you have no place to step. This is truly hell. Under that mushroom cloud, the absolutely evil atomic bomb brought gruesome death to vast numbers of innocent civilians and left those it didn’t kill with deep physical and emotional scars, including the aftereffects of radiation and endless health fears. Giving rise to social discrimination and prejudice, it devastated even the lives of those who managed to survive.

    This hell is not a thing of the past. As long as nuclear weapons exist and policymakers threaten their use, their horror could leap into our present at any moment. You could find yourself suffering their cruelty.

    To read more, click here.

    Can the World Come to Its Senses on Nuclear Weapons?

    President Trump, who is the ultimate commander of the U.S.’s nuclear arsenal, believed to consist of 6,800 warheads, has threatened North Korea with “fire and fury.” North Korea has threatened to attack the U.S. territory of Guam, in the Pacific Ocean. The threat of nuclear attack has become a bargaining chip, a threat spoken about all too easily and lightly.

    These weapons of mass destruction are designed for one purpose only: war. Their use and even the threat of their use poses an existential threat to all life on our precious planet.

    In this time where the threat of war has become thinkable again, world governments must use it as an impetus to come to their senses and disarm.

    To read more, click here.

    Obituary

    Remembering Tony de Brum

    Tony de Brum, former Foreign Minister of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, passed away on August 22. Ambassador de Brum was a selfless leader in the movements for nuclear weapons abolition and climate sanity, and he will be dearly missed.

    In 2014, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, led by Minister de Brum, filed the Nuclear Zero Lawsuits in the International Court of Justice and U.S. Federal Court, landmark cases against the nine nuclear-armed nations “for failing to comply with their obligations under international law to pursue negotiations in good faith for the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons.”

    Tony de Brum was a member of the NAPF Advisory Council and received the Foundation’s 2012 Distinguished Peace Leadership Award for his tireless work for justice and a world free of nuclear weapons.

    Tributes to de Brum have been written from all over the world, including articles by Robert C. Koehler, the Washington Post, and The New York Times.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    President Trump Threatens “Fire and Fury” Against North Korea

    On August 8, President Trump warned that North Korea would face “fire and fury like the world has never seen” if it continues to threaten the United States. Later that week, he threatened North Korea again, this time on Twitter. He wrote, “Military solutions are now fully in place, locked and loaded, should North Korea act unwisely.”

    The same week, he told reporters, “Let’s see what he [Kim Jong-un] does with Guam. If he does something in Guam, it will be an event the likes of which nobody’s seen before, what will happen in North Korea.” He added that his comments on Guam were not a “dare,” just a “statement of fact.”

    Jacob Pramuk, “Trump: Maybe ‘Fire and Fury’ Statement on North Korea Wasn’t Tough Enough,” CNBC, August 10, 2017.

    U.S. Warns Sweden Not to Sign Nuclear Ban Treaty

    U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis sent a letter to Swedish Defense Minister Peter Hultqvist warning Sweden of a negative impact on relations should they sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

    According to Svenska Dagbladet, the Swedish newspaper that originally reported the story, “The implication is that if the government signs the convention banning nuclear weapons, including on Swedish territory, it would impact both defense cooperation during peace time and the possibility of military support from the USA in a crisis situation.”

    The treaty opens for signature at the United Nations on September 20.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Mattis Warned Sweden Not to Sign Anti-Nuclear Weapons Treaty: Report,” The Local, August 30, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    German Candidate Pledges to Remove U.S. Nuclear Weapons from German Soil

    Germany’s center-left Social Democratic Party leader, Martin Fultz, promised to remove 20 U.S. nuclear warheads that are kept in the country under the auspices of NATO if elected as Chancellor in September. Fultz and the Social Democrats face rival Angela Merkel and her conservative Christian Democratic Union party, and are reportedly down 39%-25% in the polls with one month left to campaign.

    Schulz said that President Trump’s conflict with North Korea “shows us more than ever before how urgently we need to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons and encourage disarmament.”

    Erik Kirschbaum, “German Rival of Chancellor Merkel Vows to Remove U.S. Nuclear Weapons from the Country,” Los Angeles Times, August 23, 2017.

    War and Peace

    North Korea Fires Missile Over Japan

    In one of its most provocative missile tests to date, North Korea fired a ballistic missile that flew over the island of Hokkaido, Japan, on the morning of August 28. The test sparked outrage and fear across Japan, where officials halted trains and warned residents under its path to take cover. Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe requested an emergency meeting of the UN security council to address the increasingly aggressive actions taken by North Korea.

    North Korean state media said the launch was “the first step of the military operation of the (North Korean military) in the Pacific and a meaningful prelude to containing Guam,” a U.S. territory in the Pacific.

    Brad Lendon and Joshua Berlinger, “Next Target Guam, North Korea Says,” CNN, August 30, 2017.

    White House Pressuring Intelligence Officials to Find Iran in Non-Compliance with Nuclear Deal

    The White House is reported to have been putting pressure on intelligence agencies to find evidence that Iran has not been in compliance with the terms of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. The deal, negotiated with Iran and five other countries, dictated that Iran would dramatically scale down its nuclear infrastructure and fuel stockpiles in exchange for an easing of economic sanctions.

    President Trump, who has repeatedly bashed the deal as too conciliatory to Iran, seems determined to negate the deal. Yet despite Trump’s outspoken dislike for the deal, the consensus across the nation’s intelligence agencies, governmental departments, and the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)— which is in charge of inspecting Iran’s compliance with the deal— is that Iran has not violated the terms of the deal.

    Julian Borger, “White House ‘Pressuring’ Intelligence Officials to Find Iran in Violation of Nuclear Deal,” The Guardian, August 28, 2017.

    Nuclear Modernization

    U.S. Awards Contracts for Nuclear “Modernization” Programs

    Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have been chosen to design and build the next generation of air-launched nuclear cruise missiles for the U.S. military. Individual $900 million dollar contracts have been provided to both companies to develop the new weapon, known as the Long Range Standoff weapon (LRSO). The Air Force is expected to order 1,000 of the missiles. The current estimated cost for the system is $10 billion.

    The Pentagon has additionally recently awarded contracts to weapons companies Boeing and Northrup Grumman to begin work on a new land-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile system. The total cost of “modernizing” the U.S. nuclear arsenal is expected to exceed $1 trillion over the next thirty years.

    David E. Sanger and William J. Broad, “Trump Forges Ahead on Costly Nuclear Overhaul”, The New York Times, August 27, 2017.

    U.S. Conducts Additional Tests of New B61-12 Nuclear Bomb

    On August 8, the U.S. Air Force conducted two flight tests of its new B61-12 nuclear bomb at the Tonopah Test Range in Nevada. The test assemblies, which were dropped from an F-15E based at Nellis Air Force Base, evaluated the weapon’s non-nuclear functions and the aircraft’s capability to deliver the weapon.

    The B61-12 is a new nuclear bomb that combines four previous variants of the B61. It introduces new military capabilities to the U.S. arsenal, contributing to the nuclear arms race among the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations.

    B61-12 Continues to Meet Qualification Test Schedule,” National Nuclear Security Administration, August 28, 2017.

    Nuclear Energy and Waste

    Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Bank Opens in Kazakhstan

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) opened a “fuel bank” for low enriched uranium (LEU) on August 29 in Kazakhstan. The $150 million facility is designed to discourage countries from enriching their own nuclear fuel.

    “The LEU Bank will serve as a last-resort mechanism to provide confidence to countries that they will be able to obtain LEU for the manufacture of fuel for nuclear power plants in the event of an unforeseen, non-commercial disruption to their supplies,” IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said in a statement on Monday.

    While the new fuel bank may discourage countries from developing their own uranium enrichment facilities, the issues of catastrophic accidents and an inability to safely, permanently store radioactive waste continue to pose threats to people around the world.

    UN Nuclear Watchdog Opens Uranium Bank in Kazakhstan,” Reuters, August 29, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of September, including a September 14, 1954 Soviet nuclear test in which 45,000 Soviet troops were purposely exposed to a ground detonation of a 30-kiloton nuclear device.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Nuclear Close Calls

    NAPF summer intern Sarah Witmer has published an extensive list of close calls involving nuclear weapons, including incidents in which nuclear weapons were misplaced, stolen, damaged, or even detonated.

    Many of these incidents resulted in casualties, including innocent civilians, and many others nearly led to nuclear war. These close calls emphasize the lack of proper security for nuclear weapons, and the lack of training and overall competence of militaries and leaders who possess nuclear weapons. There have been far more incidents than those listed here, and likely many that militaries and world leaders withhold as classified.

    To read the report, click here.

    Foundation Activities

    New Books Now Available

    In August, new books were published by NAPF President David Krieger and NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell. The fourth edition of Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action, was edited by David Krieger. The book features hundreds of quotes organized into ten chapters related to war, peace, nuclear weapons, and the human future.

    Chappell’s new book, Soldiers of Peace: How to Wield the Weapon of Nonviolence with Maximum Force, is the sixth book in his Road to Peace series. This book offers a new paradigm in human understanding by dispelling popular myths and revealing timeless truths about the reality of struggle, rage, trauma, empathy, the limitations of violence, the power of nonviolence, and the skills needed to create lasting peace.

    Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 34th Annual Evening for Peace will take place on Sunday, October 22, in Santa Barbara, California. The theme of this year’s event is “A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World.” The Foundation will honor Dr. Ira Helfand and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with its Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    For more information, including sponsorship opportunities and tickets, click here.

    Peace Literacy Moves Forward

    After a successful five-day summer workshop with 27 participants from around the United States and Canada, NAPF’s Peace Literacy Initiative has begun reaching a broad audience. Participants included teachers, ministers, psychologists, activists, and students. Feedback from fellow participants allowed Shari Clough, a professor of philosophy at Oregon State University, to re-organize and re-launch the Peace Literacy website.

    The website, www.peaceliteracy.org, features lesson plans for different age groups that anyone can download for free. Clough said, “Kids need to learn peace in a sustained fashion – in the same way that they are taught to read and write. And for us adults, too, we have much to learn. It is never too late.”

    To read more about the Peace Literacy summer workshop and the new Peace Literacy website, click here.

    Letter in The New York Times

    On August 1, The New York Times published a letter to the editor from Rick Wayman, NAPF’s Director of Programs. The letter was in response to an article about the commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet stating that he would obey an order to launch a nuclear strike against China.

    In the letter, Wayman wrote, “Would you willingly initiate the indiscriminate slaughter of hundreds of thousands or millions of people, risking a massive nuclear exchange that could end human civilization as we know it? That is the deeper meaning of the question that Adm. Scott Swift answered in the affirmative.”

    To read the full letter, click here.

    Take Action

    Sign the Open Letter to Congress: Act to Prevent Nuclear Catastrophe

    This may be the most dangerous time in human history. The Roman emperor Nero is remembered for having fiddled while Rome burned.  We may be witnessing the far more dangerous Nuclear Age equivalent to Nero’s fiddling in the form of the nuclear threat exchanges between Donald Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un.

    Add your name to this Open Letter to members of Congress that calls on them to act urgently to prevent a nuclear catastrophe. Click here to take action.

    Quotes

     

    “All warfare is based on deception.”

    Sun Tzu. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The revised 4th edition of this book has just been published. Order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store at a 25% discount.

     

    “I would like to de-nuke the world. I know that President Obama said that global warming is the biggest threat. I totally disagree. I say that it’s a simple one: nuclear is our greatest threat worldwide. Not even a question, not even close. So I’d like to de-nuke the world. I would like Russia, and the United States, and China, and Pakistan, and many other countries that have nuclear weapons to get rid of them. But until such time as they do, we will be the most powerful nuclear nation on Earth by far.”

    U.S. President Donald Trump, in a media briefing on August 10, 2017.

     

    “I worry about, frankly, the access to the nuclear codes. [If] in a fit of pique he [President Trump] decides to do something about Kim Jong Un, there’s actually very little to stop him. The whole system is built to ensure rapid response if necessary. So there’s very little in the way of controls over exercising a nuclear option, which is pretty damn scary.”

    James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence, in an interview with CNN.

     

    “The DPRK (North Korea) will continue to strengthen its defensive capability with nuclear force, as long as U.S. … does not stop military drills on the doorstep of the DPRK. U.S. pressure and provocative acts only justify the DPRK’s measure to strengthen its self-defense capabilities.”

    Han Tae Song, North Korea’s Ambassador to the United Nations.

    Editorial Team

     

    David Krieger
    Aidan Powers-Riggs
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman

  • Sunflower Newsletter: August 2017

    Issue #241 – August 2017

    Nuclear weapons have no place in this world. Please see a special message from NAPF here.
    • Perspectives
      • U.S., UK and France Denounce Nuclear Ban Treaty by David Krieger
      • Lobbying Against Nuclear Weapons by Lilly Adams
      • After the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty: A New Disarmament Politics by Zia Mian
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Public Interest Groups File Suit Against New U.S. Nuclear Bomb Plant
      • Los Alamos Lab Ships Weapons-Grade Plutonium by FedEx Air
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • Activists Breach German Air Base Where U.S. Nuclear Weapons Are Kept
    • Nuclear Zero Lawsuits
      • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Marshall Islands Lawsuit vs. U.S.
    • Missile Defense
      • Sailor Presses Wrong Button, Causing Missile Defense Test to Fail
    • War and Peace
      • The Iran Deal Turns Two. Will It Make It to Three?
      • North Korea Advances Its Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Technology
      • The Story of a Man Who Survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    • Nuclear Modernization
      • SIPRI Study Shows Nuclear-Armed Nations Continue to Prioritize “Modernization”
    • Nuclear Energy and Waste
      • Tons of Nuclear Waste Stored Perilously Close to Ocean in California
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • A Brief Guide to the New Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty
      • Inspiring Positive Social Change
    • Foundation Activities
      • Sadako Peace Day: Commemorating the Victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
      • Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World
      • Peace Literacy Summer Workshop
      • Timeline of the Nuclear Age
    • Take Action
      • Tell Congress that Nuclear Weapons Are Banned
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    U.S., UK and France Denounce Nuclear Ban Treaty

    The U.S., UK and France have never shown enthusiasm for banning and eliminating nuclear weapons. It is not surprising, therefore, that they did not participate in the United Nations negotiations leading to the recent adoption of the nuclear ban treaty, or that they joined together in expressing their outright defiance of the newly-adopted treaty.

    In a joint press statement, issued on July 7, 2017, the day the treaty was adopted, the U.S., UK and France stated, “We do not intend to sign, ratify or ever become party to it.” Seriously? Rather than supporting the countries that came together and hammered out the treaty, the three countries argued: “This initiative clearly disregards the realities of the international security environment.” Rather than taking a leadership role in the negotiations, they protested the talks and the resulting treaty banning nuclear weapons. They chose hubris over wisdom, might over right.

    To read more, click here.

    Lobbying Against Nuclear Weapons

    Today, the U.S. has nearly 7,000 nuclear weapons, and we are rebuilding them to the tune of more than $1 trillion over the next 30 years. I’m determined to make my voice heard in opposing this, and help others do the same.

    For many, “lobbying” is a dirty word. But I see a lobbyist simply as someone who tries to influence the position of an elected official. I use that title proudly, and I argue that we should all be citizen lobbyists on issues we care about.

    To read more, click here.

    After the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty: A New Disarmament Politics

    A treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was adopted by an overwhelming vote and met with loud cheers this week at the United Nations. More than 70 years in the making, the treaty offers widely agreed principles, commitments, and mechanisms for ending the nuclear weapons age. Getting here was not easy, and achieving nuclear disarmament will still be a long struggle. But the new treaty creates space and means for a creative new disarmament politics based on law and ethics and democracy that go beyond well-trodden debates on the dangers and costs of nuclear weapons and traditional practices of arms control based on step-by-step reductions that limit only the size of arsenals.

    The treaty is in many ways an attempt to reaffirm—and hold humanity to—the highest universal ideals of a world of peace and justice based on law. It exposes the fundamental contradiction between nuclear weapons and the existing international system. The treaty opens with the simple declaration that the countries adopting it are “[d]etermined to contribute to the realization of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”

    To read the full article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, click here.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Public Interest Groups File Suit Against New U.S. Nuclear Bomb Plant

    On July 20, three organizations — Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, Nuclear Watch New Mexico, and Natural Resources Defense Council — filed a federal lawsuit to stop construction at the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The facility is being planned in order to produce components for thermonuclear weapons through the year 2080.

    Supplanting the approved plan for a single new building to house the entire UPF, the current plan involves five new buildings, along with two older buildings that do not meet environmental and safety standards. Moreover, only one of the new buildings is designed to modern seismic standards, which could have a devastating impact on public health. The lawsuit aims to force the National Nuclear Security Administration to complete a supplemental environmental impact statement prior to continuing construction.

    John Huotari, “Federal Lawsuit Asks for Environmental Review of New UPF Design,” Oak Ridge Today, July 23, 2017.

    Los Alamos Lab Ships Weapons-Grade Plutonium by FedEx Air

    In the latest safety debacle relating to nuclear materials at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, one of its employees shipped 100 grams of weapons-grade plutonium, which was packaged for ground transport, by FedEx Air to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California and the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. Even though the nuclear material is reported to have arrived safely at its destinations, nuclear watchdog groups say the lab was lucky to avoid a disaster given that rapid pressure changes are possible during a flight and the packaging wasn’t appropriate for such a trip.

    As Los Alamos Lab prepares to expand its production of plutonium pits for new nuclear warheads, an independent panel of federal regulators has been tasked with assessing the lab’s track record, and its ability to work with plutonium.

    National Lab Fedexed Plutonium to Lawrence Livermore,” CBS SF Bay Area, July 11, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    Activists Breach German Air Base Where U.S. Nuclear Weapons Are Kept

    On July 16, more than 30 American and Dutch citizens marched onto a military base in Buchel, Germany, where U.S. B61 nuclear bombs are deployed. On the base, activists lowered the American flag from the flagpole and called for a meeting with the American base commander, in order to give him a copy of the new UN Nuclear Ban Treaty adopted on July 7. After 45 minutes, police expelled all activists from the base without charge.

    The next day, the base commander did finally agree to meet with the American activists, and received the text of the Nuclear Ban Treaty that they offered him.

    Ralph Hutchison, “U.S. Citizens Take Action Against Nuclear Bombs in Europe,” Popular Resistance, July 18, 2017.

    Nuclear Zero Lawsuits

    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Marshall Islands Lawsuit vs. U.S.

    On July 31, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the lawsuit brought by the Republic of the Marshall Islands against the United States. The lawsuit sought a declaration that the United States was in breach of its treaty obligations under Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and international law, and asked the court to order that the United States engage in good-faith negotiations.

    The ruling from the court held that Article VI was non-self-executing and therefore not judicially enforceable. The panel also found that the Marshall Islands’ claims presented inextricable political questions that were nonjusticiable and must be dismissed.

    Rick Wayman, Director of Programs for the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, stated, “This ruling from the Ninth Circuit continues the trend of a complete lack of accountability on the part of the U.S. government for its nuclear proliferation, active participation in a nuclear arms race, and refusal to participate in nuclear disarmament negotiations.”

    Marshall Islands Nuclear Zero Lawsuit Appeal Dismissed in Ninth Circuit Court,” Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, July 31, 2017.

    Missile Defense

    Sailor Presses Wrong Button, Causing Missile Defense Test to Fail

    In June, the U.S. Navy and Raytheon conducted a test of the new SM-3 IIA missile defense interceptor in conjunction with the high-tech Aegis Combat System. The test failed when the interceptor missile combusted en route to its target.

    A sailor aboard the U.S.S. John Paul Jones, the U.S. Navy’s ballistic missile defense test ship, apparently pressed the wrong button during the test mission, leading to the interceptor missile “blowing itself to smithereens.” How could an error so simple have happened? In the Aegis Combat System, there is a signaling mechanism that designates incoming targets as either hostile or friendly, which determines the actions of the missile. The sailor is reported to have accidentally pushed the “friendly” button instead of the “hostile” one.

    Tyler Rogoway, “Report Says Missile Defense Test Failed Because Sailor Pushed The Wrong Button,” The Drive, July 24, 2017.

    War and Peace

    The Iran Deal Turns Two. Will It Make It to Three?

    July 14 marked the two-year anniversary of the Iran nuclear deal, but its future is increasingly uncertain. On July 17, the Trump administration reluctantly certified to Congress that Iran has continued to comply with the terms of the deal. The decision to re-certify was highly contentious, involving long debates behind the scenes in which Trump demanded stricter policies to replace the agreement, which he considers too favorable toward Iran.

    The following day, the Trump administration announced plans to reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted under the deal. Iran argues that adding back sanctions is an actual violation of the agreement, and stands by its right to continue testing missiles in the name of self-defense. It further emphasized its intention to “reciprocate” for the new sanctions. With more moderate advisors imploring Trump to keep the agreement, and hardliners arguing that it should be trashed, the nuclear deal may end up another casualty of ongoing clashes within the White House.

    David E. Sanger and Rick Gladstone, “As Relations Worsen, Iran Says U.S. Sanctions May Violate Nuclear Deal,” The New York Times, July 18, 2017.

    North Korea Advances Its Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Technology

    On July 4, North Korea conducted a test of its Hwasong-14 missile, which it claims is an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting the “heart of the United States” with “large heavy nuclear warheads.” The Trump administration said that the U.S. would use “the full range of capabilities at our disposal against the growing threat.”

    Kim Jong-un said, “The American bastards must be quite unhappy after closely watching our strategic decision. I guess they are not too happy with the gift package we sent them for the occasion of their Independence Day. We should often send them gift packages so they won’t be too bored.” President Trump responded on Twitter, “North Korea has just launched another missile. Does this guy [Kim] have anything better to do with his life?”

    Following the July 4 test, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency released a new assessment of its estimate of the time before North Korea would likely be able to reliably field a nuclear-capable ICBM that could hit North American cities. The DIA now estimates that North Korea could have this capability by next year.

    On July 28, North Korea launched yet another ICBM. According to David Wright of the Union of Concerned Scientists, this latest test indicates a likely range of 6,500 miles, putting many U.S. cities within reach.

    Choe Sang-Hun, “U.S. Confirms North Korea Fired Intercontinental Ballistic Missile,” The New York Times, July 4, 2017.

    Ellen Nakashima, Anna Fifield and Joby Warrick, “North Korea Could Cross ICBM Threshold Next Year, U.S. Officials Warn in New Assessment,” Washington Post, July 25, 2017.

    Oliver Laughland, “North Korea: Missiles Capable of Hitting New York Raise Stakes in Tense Standoff,” The Guardian, July 28, 2017.

    The Story of a Man Who Survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    On August 6, 1945, Tsutomu Yamaguchi, a Japanese man working as an engineer for Mitsubishi, was on a business trip in Hiroshima. He survived the atomic bombing that destroyed the city and killed tens of thousands of people instantly. Yamaguchi was able to make his way to the Hiroshima train station in the south of the city and got on a train to his hometown of Nagasaki. Three days later, on August 9, he was in Nagasaki when the U.S. dropped another atomic bomb there. In each case, he was within two miles of ground zero.

    Mr. Yamaguchi, outspoken about the abolition of nuclear weapons, lived until 2010, 65 years after he experienced two nuclear attacks within the span of three days. He died at the age of 93.

    Double Blasted,” Radiolab, July 16, 2012.

    Nuclear Modernization

    SIPRI Study Shows Nuclear-Armed Nations Continue to Prioritize “Modernization”

    On July 3, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) released its annual report on nuclear arsenals. The data shows that while the overall number of nuclear weapons in the world continues to decrease, nuclear weapon-possessing states are heavily investing in modernizing their arsenals. The U.S. is obligated under the New START treaty to reduce its arsenal, but it plans to spend $400 billion over the next nine years to comprehensively update the nuclear forces it still possesses. Russia, while bound by the same treaty, is also pursuing an extensive modernization program. Each of the seven other nations with nuclear arsenals—the U.K., France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea—are either developing new nuclear weapon delivery systems, or have announced their intention to do so.

    “Despite the recent progress in international talks on a treaty banning nuclear weapons, long-term modernization programs are under way in all nine states,” said SIPRI Senior Researcher Shannon Kile. “This suggests that none of these states will be prepared to give up their nuclear arsenals for the foreseeable future.”

    Global Nuclear Weapons: Modernization Remains the Priority,” SIPRI, July 3, 2017.

    Nuclear Energy and Waste

    Tons of Nuclear Waste Stored Perilously Close to Ocean in California

    Over 1,800 tons of highly-radioactive waste is being stored at San Onofre, a shuttered nuclear power plant on the Pacific coast between Los Angeles and San Diego. This is just one of dozens of sites around the nation in which radioactive waste is being stored “temporarily,” with no safe permanent solution in sight.

    The Trump Administration is considering licensing private companies to create consolidated storage sites in Texas and New Mexico, which would necessitate the transport of thousands of tons of highly-radioactive waste by rail and road from around the United States. Then, assuming a “permanent” storage solution is found at some point in the future, the waste would have to be transported again.

    Ralph Vartabedian and Allen Schaben, “1,800 Tons of Radioactive Waste has an Ocean View and Nowhere to Go,” Los Angeles Times, July 2, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of August, including the August 12, 2000 incident in which the Russian nuclear-powered submarine Kursk sank, killing all 118 crew members on board.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    A Brief Guide to the New Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

    The majority of the world’s countries just adopted a new treaty banning nuclear weapons, placing them in the same category of international law as other weapons of mass destruction (chemical and biological weapons) or weapons that cause unacceptable harm (landmines and cluster munitions). Despite this being the most significant development in global nuclear politics since the end of the Cold War, discussion of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is almost absent from the U.S. news media and often misunderstood in DC policy circles.

    This article by Matthew Bolton, Director of the International Disarmament Institute at Pace University, provides an overview of the treaty and its contributions to international law and nuclear disarmament.

    To read the full article, click here.

    Inspiring Positive Social Change

    NAPF Associate Martin Hellman and his wife Dorothie were interviewed about their book as part of an online series called “Inspiring Positive Social Change.” Click here to gain access to all the interviews at no charge. This interview series features passionate and inspiring leaders in the fields of spirituality, neuroscience, peacebuilding, compassion, and peace education.

    The Hellmans’ book, A New Map for Relationships: Creating True Love at Home & Peace on the Planet, won praise from people as diverse as a former Secretary of Defense and NAPF’s president David Krieger. A PDF of the book can be downloaded for free. Hard copies of the book are available for purchase on the NAPF online shop.

    Foundation Activities

    Sadako Peace Day: Commemorating the Victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host the 23rd Annual Sadako Peace Day on August 9 at La Casa de Maria in Santa Barbara, California. The event will feature music, poetry and reflection to remember the victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, and all innocent victims of war.

    NAPF Board Member Jimmy Hara will deliver the keynote address at this year’s event.

    For more information on the Foundation’s annual Sadako Peace Day event, click here.

    Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 34th Annual Evening for Peace will take place on Sunday, October 22, in Santa Barbara, California. The theme of this year’s event is “A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World.” The Foundation will honor Dr. Ira Helfand and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with the Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    For more information, including sponsorship opportunities and tickets, click here.

    Peace Literacy Summer Workshops

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation held an intensive Peace Literacy workshop in Santa Barbara, California, from July 16-21. Twenty-seven participants from around the world came together for the workshop, led by NAPF’s Peace Leadership Director, Paul K. Chappell. Among the participants were psychologists, professors, ministers, and students. To see the outline of the five-day workshop, click here.

    On August 9, Chappell will deliver a free day-long workshop at La Casa de Maria in Santa Barbara. The workshop, entitled “A Skill Set for Peace in Challenging Times,” will cover every aspect of being human, from solving national and global problems, to confronting the root causes of violence and bullying, to overcoming rage and trauma. To register for this free workshop, click here.

    To learn more about the Peace Literacy movement, click here.

    Timeline of the Nuclear Age

    Nuclear Files, a website operated by the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, contains thousands of full-text primary source materials on nuclear history. It is an invaluable tool for exploring the challenges of the Nuclear Age, including information about historic nuclear events, nuclear weapon technology, government treaties, and biographies.

    The Nuclear Files timeline lists many key events that have taken place throughout the Nuclear Age. The timeline has been updated to include events through the first half of 2017. Click here to view the timeline.

    Take Action

    Tell Congress that Nuclear Weapons Are Banned

    The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is an important step toward the elimination of nuclear weapons. The majority of the world’s nations consider nuclear weapons to be illegal, immoral, and prohibited. We were dismayed that the United States actively boycotted this process and responded to it in a hostile manner. Responding to the newly-adopted treaty in a joint statement, the U.S., UK, and France stated, “We do not intend to sign, ratify or ever become party to it.”

    This is yet another example of the U.S. ceding its leadership role in the world. While the majority of the world has negotiated in good faith to ban nuclear weapons, the U.S. and other nuclear-armed nations stubbornly continue to cling to the concept of nuclear deterrence.

    Please take a moment today to send a message to your elected representatives in Washington, DC, letting them know about the new nuclear ban treaty. Ask them to consider this emerging legal norm prohibiting nuclear weapons as they make decisions on funding nuclear weapons programs in next year’s budget.

    Quotes

     

    “The most terrifying monster lurking in the darkness of Hiroshima is precisely the possibility that man might become no longer human.”

    Kenzaburo Oe, Japanese author and 1994 Nobel Laureate in Literature. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The revised 4th edition of this book will be released in the next few weeks. Pre-order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store at a 25% discount.

     

    “We’ve always known that nuclear weapons are immoral. Now they are also illegal.”

    Setsuko Thurlow, a survivor of the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima and member of the NAPF Advisory Council, in her closing remarks at the United Nations after the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was adopted on July 7, 2017.

     

    “The directors of the Livermore, Sandia and Los Alamos nuclear weapons labs in truth wear two hats – the first as lab directors, the second as presidents of the for-profit limited liability corporations running the labs. This inherent conflict of interest skews U.S. nuclear weapons policy and should be brought to an end.”

    Jay Coghlan, Executive Director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, in a July 21 op-ed in the Albuquerque Journal.

    Editorial Team

     

    Megan Cox
    David Krieger
    Vaishanavi Mirapurkar
    Kristian Rolland
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman
    Sarah Witmer

     

  • Sunflower Newsletter: July 2017

    Issue #240 – July 2017

    Donate Now!

    Please join our Peace Literacy Movement and support the free curriculum that we helped develop to spread Peace Literacy in schools and communities. When you sign up for our Monthly Giving Circle (monthly donation program) we will send you a Peace Literacy tote bag, which you can take anywhere to spread the message of peace.

    • Perspectives
      • Probability of Nuclear War by David Krieger
      • Russell-Einstein Manifesto
      • Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea: The Real Story by Martin Hellman
    • U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
      • Los Alamos Lab Under Scrutiny After Numerous Safety Violations
      • U.S. Conference of Mayors Supports Nuclear Disarmament
    • Nuclear Disarmament
      • Hibakusha Push for Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty
    • Missile Defense
      • Missile Defense Test Fails
    • War and Peace
      • Nuclear Crisis Group Issues Recommendations
      • North Korea Offers to Halt Tests if U.S. and South Korea Stop Military Exercises
    • Nuclear Modernization
      • U.S. General Wants “Modernization” Efforts Accelerated
    • Nuclear Energy and Waste
      • U.S. Sailors Can Sue Japan and TEPCO in U.S. Court
    • Resources
      • This Month in Nuclear Threat History
      • Understanding Nuclear Weapon Risks
      • Nuclear Ban Daily
    • Foundation Activities
      • NAPF Statement and Working Paper at the Nuclear Ban Treaty Negotiations
      • 23rd Annual Sadako Peace Day
      • Building Peace Literacy Curriculum
      • Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World
    • Take Action
      • Cards for Humanity: Earth to Nikki Haley
    • Quotes

     

    Perspectives

    Probability of Nuclear War

    Most people go about their lives giving minimal thought to the consequences or probability of nuclear war.  The consequences are generally understood to be catastrophic and, as a result, the probability of nuclear war is thought to be extremely low.  But is this actually the case?  Should people feel safe from nuclear war on the basis of a perceived low probability of occurrence?

    Since the consequences of nuclear war could be as high as human extinction, the probability of such an outcome would preferably be zero, but this is clearly not the case.  Nuclear weapons have been used twice in the past 72 years, at a time when only one country possessed these weapons.  Today, nine countries possess nuclear weapons, and there are nearly 15,000 of them in the world.

    To read more, click here.

    Russell-Einstein Manifesto

    Introductory remarks by David Krieger: The Russell-Einstein Manifesto, issued in London on July 9, 1955, is one of the greatest documents of the 20th century. It remains a critical warning to humanity in the 21st century. As we approach the 62nd anniversary of the Manifesto, it is worthwhile to read it again (or for the first time) and reflect on its message to humanity.  It addresses the choices before us: “continual progress in happiness, knowledge and wisdom” or “the risk of universal death.” It was the last public statement Einstein signed before his death. Of its 9 signers in addition to Russell and Einstein, two were members of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s Advisory Council, Linus Pauling and Sir Joseph Rotblat. Pauling was a great scientist and two-time Nobel Laureate. Rotblat was the only scientist to leave the Manhattan Project as a matter of conscience. He was a founder of the Pugwash Conferences and received the Nobel Peace Prize 50 years after the tragic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. At NAPF, we carry on the commitment of the Russell-Einstein Manifesto to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons. We accept its advice: “Remember your humanity, and forget the rest.”

    To read the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, click here.

    Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea: The Real Story

    The media tell us that nuclear diplomacy with North Korea is a waste of time, as do most high officials from every recent U.S. administration. But easily verifiable facts show otherwise. The most important data point: North Korea did not do its first nuclear test until four years after President Bush tore up our nuclear agreement with the North, known as the 1994 Agreed Framework.

    Our tearing up the Agreed Framework played a major role in North Korea becoming the nuclear-armed menace it is today. That history lesson is very applicable to current calls to tear up our nuclear deal with Iran. Why do we think this time would be different?

    To read more, click here.

    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Los Alamos Lab Under Scrutiny After Numerous Safety Violations

    The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) has published the results of a year-long investigation into Los Alamos National Lab’s reported “climate of impunity” around nuclear safety violations. The investigation was spurred by a 2011 incident involving the careless placement of plutonium rods too close together — a mistake that could have caused a deadly criticality incident.

    CPI’s report reveals many instances of a lax safety culture leading to accidents that put workers and the public at risk. Click here to read a summary by NAPF Summer Intern Megan Cox.

    Peter Cary, Patrick Malone, and R. Jeffrey Smith, “These Workers’ Lives Are Endangered While Contractors Running Nuclear Weapons Plants Make Millions,” USA Today, June 26, 2017.

    U.S. Conference of Mayors Supports Nuclear Disarmament

    In late June, mayors from across the United States assembled in Miami for the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ 85th Annual Meeting. Many resolutions were passed during this time, including one that extensively addressed United States nuclear policy.

    The resolution called upon President Trump to lower nuclear tensions by engaging in “intense diplomatic efforts” with nuclear-armed states and their allies. The mayors also commended the nuclear ban treaty negotiations at the UN, and expressed strong disapproval of U.S. refusal to participate in the talks.

    It was also noted that the U.S. government should move forward with the proposed Restricting First Use Of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2017, a bill that NAPF and many other organizations have passionately pushed forward while lobbying on Capitol Hill. If passed, it would prevent the president from conducting a nuclear first-strike without the approval of Congress.

    Lastly, the resolution requested that the U.S. “reverse its federal spending priorities” by transferring nuclear weapons funds to causes more intimately related to the public’s well-being. Examples of such concerns include the restoration of funding for Community Block Development Grants and the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Andrea Germanos, “U.S. Mayors: Instead of War, Spend Big on ‘Human and Environmental Needs’,” Common Dreams, June 26, 2017.

    Nuclear Disarmament

    Hibakusha Push for Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty

    During the negotiations for the first-ever treaty banning nuclear weapons in June, two Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors, Masao Tomonaga and Masako Wada, pressed the countries participating to help achieve their dream of seeing the treaty text adopted in July. The survivors, called hibakusha in Japanese, aim to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

    As representatives of non-governmental organizations, Tomonaga and Wada delivered remarks at the UN conference. Tomonaga believes that a “nuclear ban treaty is essential in order to further strengthen the will of mankind.” Masako Wada said, “The nuclear weapon is created by humans, used by humans, and therefore has to be abolished by humans.”

    The second draft of the nuclear ban treaty contains a preambular paragraph highlighting the role of hibakusha: “Mindful of the unacceptable suffering of and harm caused to the victims of the use of nuclear weapons (Hibakusha) as well as of those affected by the testing of nuclear weapons.”

    A-Bomb Survivors Press for Weapon Ban, to Make Nagasaki Nuclear Bombing World’s Last,” Kyodo, June 32, 2017.

    Missile Defense

    Missile Defense Test Fails

    In a test exercise on June 21, the U.S. launched a medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawai’i. The U.S.S. John Paul Jones, armed with a SM-3 guided missile, tracked the MRBM and fired the guided missile for interception and destruction. Though designed to take down medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), the SM-3 missed the target. This was the fourth flight test of the SM-3 and the second intercept test; the first intercept test in February was claimed to be a success.

    The U.S. and Japan have collaborated on the development of missile defense system technology as North Korea continues to test missiles and nuclear warheads. Meanwhile, North Korea claims that its continued nuclear weapons development is provoked by U.S. military presence in Japan and South Korea. Japan and South Korea could be targeted by MRBMs and IRBMS, falling within the defensive range of the recently tested SM-3 missile.

    Courtney Kube, “U.S. Fails to Shoot Down Ballistic Missile in Test,” NBC News, June 22, 2017.

    War and Peace

    Nuclear Crisis Group Issues Recommendations

    On June 28, a group of former military officials and experts known as the Nuclear Crisis Group published a series of recommendations for avoiding nuclear war, in a report commissioned by Global Zero. The group, composed of leaders from the U.S., Russia, China, India, and Pakistan, advised the Trump administration to establish direct talks with North Korea, emphasized the need for the U.S., Russia, and NATO to enable direct communication between their militaries, and urged India and Pakistan to set up a nuclear hotline.

    The group’s advice on North Korea coincided with a bipartisan letter sent to Trump the same day by former top U.S. officials—including former Secretaries of State, Defense, and Energy—also advising him to initiate direct talks with Kim Jong-un. As the Nuclear Crisis Group concludes in its report, “The risk of nuclear weapons use, intended or otherwise, is unacceptably high.”

    Bryan Bender, “Ex-nuke Commanders: Talk to North Korea, Open NATO-Russia Dialogue,” Politico, June 28, 2017.

    North Korea Offers to Halt Tests if U.S. and South Korea Stop Military Exercises

    North Korea’s ambassador to India, Kye Chun Yong, stated in an interview on June 21 that his country would consider “temporarily” halting nuclear and missile tests if the U.S. and South Korea halt their joint military exercises near the Korean Peninsula.  Kye’s comments about a “moratorium” came days after an advisor to newly-elected South Korean President Moon Jae-in unexpectedly suggested a similar compromise in a speech from Washington.

    Some argue North Korea is “intent on driving a wedge” in the U.S.-South Korea relationship, and offered this compromise as a means of aggravating policy disagreements between the Trump administration and the new South Korean administration, which has expressed support of “inter-Korean dialogue” over military demonstrations. Kye asserted that Kim Jong-un is open to meeting with Moon and conversing with the U.S., while also insisting that “possessing nuclear weapons is inevitable.”

    Yuji Kuronuma, “North Korean Diplomat Offers Compromise to Halt Nuclear Tests,” Nikkei, June 23, 2017.

    Nuclear Modernization

    U.S. General Wants “Modernization” Efforts Accelerated

    Gen. John Hyten, head of U.S. Strategic Command, believes that the United States should be moving faster in its efforts to build new nuclear warheads and delivery systems. Gen. Hyten said that the schedules for designing and producing new bomber aircraft, nuclear-armed submarines, and land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles are too drawn out.

    Many of the so-called “modernization” programs are scheduled to take place simultaneously in the 2020s, leading to many unanswered questions about the government’s ability to fund the new nuclear arsenal.

    Pat Host, “U.S. Gen. Hyten Wants Pentagon Nuclear Modernization Efforts Accelerated,” IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly, June 21, 2017.

    Nuclear Energy and Waste

    U.S. Sailors Can Sue Japan and TEPCO in U.S. Court

    A federal appeals court ruled on June 22 that members of the U.S. Navy can sue Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) and the Japanese government from U.S. courts rather than Japanese courts for radiation exposure following the March 11, 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster. Naval forces were stationed off the coast of Fukushima to provide humanitarian aid in the wake of the 9.0 magnitude earthquake and ensuing tsunami.

    The plaintiffs assert that TEPCO and the Japanese government conspired to keep the extent of the radiation leak and exposure risks a secret.

    U.S. Court: Sailors Can Sue in U.S. Over Japanese Nuclear Disaster,” The Mainichi, June 23, 2017.

     Resources

    This Month in Nuclear Threat History

    History chronicles many instances when humans have been threatened by nuclear weapons. In this article, Jeffrey Mason outlines some of the threats that have taken place in the month of July, including the July 16, 1945 Trinity nuclear bomb test, the world’s first-ever nuclear weapon explosion.

    To read Mason’s full article, click here.

    For more information on the history of the Nuclear Age, visit NAPF’s Nuclear Files website.

    Understanding Nuclear Weapon Risks

    A recent study by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) examines the many factors that increase the risk of a nuclear detonation. According to the authors, “The lack of nuclear weapons use since Hiroshima and Nagasaki cannot on its own be interpreted as evidence that the likelihood of a detonation event is minimal.”

    The authors continue, “The lack of in-depth information concerning the precise nature of nuclear risk is especially problematic in the contemporary global environment. Rising tensions involving nuclear-armed and other States, lower thresholds in nuclear use driven by technological developments, growing automation in command and control and weapons systems, and new threats in terms of both actors and crises are prominent features of the current international security situation. Detailing the overall risk “picture” is a critical first step to any mitigation effort.”

    To download a copy of UNIDIR’s “Understanding Nuclear Weapon Risks” report, click here.

    Nuclear Ban Daily

    As the majority of the world’s nations near the conclusion of negotiations at the United Nations on a treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons, new developments are happening every day. Reaching Critical Will, a project of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, publishes a daily summary of the negotiations, along with opinion and analysis from some of the world’s top advocates for nuclear disarmament.

    Nuclear Ban Daily is distributed to all delegations attending the negotiations, and is available to read online here.

    Foundation Activities

    NAPF Statement and Working Paper at the Nuclear Ban Treaty Negotiations

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation submitted a Working Paper to the UN conference to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading to their total elimination. The paper, entitled “The Dangers of Nuclear Deterrence, and the Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons: Important Elements to Include in a Legally Binding Instrument,” lays out the Foundation’s views on the importance of delegitimizing the concept of nuclear deterrence.

    NAPF’s Director of Programs, Rick Wayman, delivered a statement at the June 16 negotiating session about nuclear deterrence and the threat of use of nuclear weapons. A transcript and video of the statement is here.

    23rd Annual Sadako Peace Day

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will host the 23rd Annual Sadako Peace Day on August 9 at La Casa de Maria in Santa Barbara, California. The event will feature music, poetry and reflection to remember the victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, and all innocent victims of war.

    For more information on the Foundation’s annual Sadako Peace Day event, click here.

    Building Peace Literacy Curriculum

    “A Year of Peace Literacy” began with NAPF Peace Leadership Director Paul K. Chappell’s talk at the Whiteside Theatre in Corvallis, Oregon last November at the invitation of an alum of Chappell’s summer workshop in 2013, Professor Linda Richards from Oregon State University (OSU). It built momentum with a quick return visit in March that saw OSU Professor Shari Clough and high school principal Eric Wright added to the team, and continued this June with “Building Peace Literacy Curriculum,” Chappell’s workshop for public school teachers and administrators held at Crescent Valley High School in Corvallis. Participants included more than 18 teachers, from every grade level at schools from Corvallis, Eugene, and Salem, as well as vice principals and principals.

    Professor Clough said, “There are already a number of amazing educators around the US and Canada working on incorporating Chappell’s Peace Literacy curriculum in the classroom. The goal is for OSU to become an organizational hub that can provide resources for educators in Peace Literacy. This is more than a selection of new lesson plans. Peace Literacy is the start of an international movement.”

    To read more about the extensive efforts in Corvallis, Oregon, click here.

    Evening for Peace: A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World

    The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation’s 34th Annual Evening for Peace will take place on Sunday, October 22, in Santa Barbara, California. The theme of this year’s event is “A Prescription for a Nuclear-Free World.” The Foundation will honor Dr. Ira Helfand and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War with the Distinguished Peace Leadership Award.

    For more information, including sponsorship opportunities and tickets, click here.

    Take Action

    Cards for Humanity: Earth to Nikki Haley

    More than 130 countries have participated in negotiations on a treaty banning nuclear weapons. The United States government has actively boycotted the negotiations. Just as negotiations began in March, United States Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley staged a protest right outside the door. “There is nothing I want more for my family than a world with no nuclear weapons,” she stated. “But we have to be realistic.”

    At the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, we believe that a nuclear-free world is not only realistic — it’s essential. We want to send a message to Ambassador Haley, and we need your help. Buy a $1 postcard in our online store and we’ll mail it directly to Ambassador Haley’s office. This is part of a new campaign, Cards for Humanity: Earth to Nikki Haley, focused on educating our communities and empowering our actions for nuclear disarmament.

    Click on this link to send a postcard to Ambassador Haley.

    Quotes

     

    “In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.”

    Albert Einstein. This quote appears in the book Speaking of Peace: Quotations to Inspire Action. The revised 4th edition of this book will be released in the next few weeks. Pre-order copies today in the NAPF Peace Store at a 25% discount.

     

    “The abolition of nuclear weapons will not be possible so long as nuclear deterrence holds sway as an alleged means of defense and ensuring peace and security.”

    John Burroughs, Executive Director of Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy, in an op-ed for Reaching Critical Will’s Nuclear Ban Daily.

     

    “Young women and men are the future, and trust me…we’ve got this.”

    Leah Murphy, a 23-year-old from Ireland, in an article about her recent work with the Amplify Youth Network advocating for a nuclear weapons ban treaty at the United Nations.

    Editorial Team

     

    Megan Cox
    David Krieger
    Vaishanavi Mirapurkar
    Kristian Rolland
    Carol Warner
    Rick Wayman
    Sarah Witmer